28 Jul 2015

(220) Shakespeare Authorship of Henry V: How many indications are needed for a Circumstancial Evidence?

Quarto 3 of Henry V  ( published in 1619 [with a false date of  Q3-1608)

  had 1623 lines, the First Folio 3227 lines. 

How to explain this discrepancy?



               

Q3 the last of the 3 Quartos of Henry V (Q1-1600, Q2-1602 )  published in 1619 [with a false date of  Q3-1608 — part of William Jaggard's False Folio]

                                    had 1623 lines, the First Folio 3227 lines. 

The only reason or motive – i can see - to completey redo the play decades after its creation must have been the occasion of the publication that warranted a carefull finishing hand to produce a final authorized text in the First Folio 1623 , with the new title "The Life of Henry the Fifth".

There are  serious difficulties to imagine why, when and if at all (a decade in advance of the first folio??) the retired Shakspere (not at all involved in the First Folio 1623) felt the need to restructure and add additional 1604(!!) lines .

The most plausible explanation is, that 


 the additions for the First Folio 1623  were written by  surviving Christopher Marlowe  (alias the "true" Shake-speare, with  many  other pseudonyms) .
 (See als Blog 118)