Compelling logical and plausible contextual arguments
"Nicholas Breton",
contemporary to Shakespeare and unidentifiable in his
lifetime [beyond his works], must have been
a Penname or literary Pseudonym of
Marlowe [aka Shake-speare]
____________________________________
It remains utterly inexplicable why generations of literary scholars have not even attempted to enlighten and understand
a) what autobiographical and deeper meaningful contents lay behind the complex texts, the poetry and philosophy of the prolific genius Nicholas Breton,
b) who actually this productive, witty contemporary of Shakespeare was and
c) why Breton does not even belong to the devious list of today's discussed Shakspeare authorship candidates?
A great event has happened.....a milestone
"As of August 1, 2020,
all texts produced under
EEBO Phase I and Phase II
are freely available to the public."
I became aware of "Langton lite", with 2 posts on the Authorship issue.-
What a surprise, a new Marlowian efforts at the horizon ?
, …my key question to Dr.Christian Taylor. : what is his main reason to rehash (at this moment) a century old terribly stale taboo discussion on all the damn old topics (spelling, correspondence, biographical contents, the will, illiterate family etc. etc. etc.
Where is the solution supposed to come from, if not from a radical turnaround in traditional views?
A complete new "Marlowianism"?
It seems not likely that a more logic
and more plausible „conspiracy authorship thesis“ (than the Multi-pseudonymity
thesis of poet genius and former Superstar of the London Theater ) will arise. It may even well be, that a global intelligence
will never be able or ready to understand and resolve the complexity of the authorship problem, let alone the singular virtually
inconceivable mental capacity of the singular „true“ Shakespeare [Marlowe].
Multi-Pseudonymity thesis of Marlowe
Collected single Argument s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7VeQ7OER14&t=1s&ab_channel=bastianconrad
