(542) A weird "Shakespeare "conspiracy theory" : Shakespeare's Apocrypha ?

The Shakespeare Apocrypha:  

a ghostly literary-historical Fake or Hoax!

The "Shakespeare Apocrypha" is a group of several plays and poems printed during Shakespeare's lifetime ....

2 examples of Plays by Shakespeare

    The LONDON PRODIGAL

    A YORHSHIRE TRAGREDY

- Believe it or not!-
.....with his name (Shakespeare) printed on the title ...but not accepted today as his works (...generally deemed to be the work of other uncertain writers.)

Are we really to believe  that a contemporary playwright with the printed name Shakespeare corresponded to a historical fake or conspiracy  ?

Can anybody understand why this weird "Shakespeare [Apocrypha] Conspiracy theory" has been separated from the general "Shakespearean Authorship debate" ?

..as if the autorship debate were unrelated!

______________

________________

For details click this Video!

(541) Michael Wood disqualifies himself shockingly on the issue of Shakespeare's authorship!

Documentary Shakespeare Filmmaker  Michael Wood's  

in an interview in Paul Bradshaws "Virals History' " dealt 

with the authorship of Shakespeare....

                                  ..formulating  his opinion on the century old question :

Wood must be seen as the most impressive prototypical Ignorant  discrediting "a real existing Shakespeare Autorship problem", 

using most of the dishonest tricks put together in this video!         

                                                                                                                                                   

MICHAEL WOOD:  (2:13 min) " I am fairly  brusque with the Shakespeare deniers, its  a load of rubbish - to be honest- . There is a couple of things, it raises interesting questions;  The key thing is - you know- that it is about  what historians do and this debate like all other debates in history is something historians decide and its about sources, and historians construct their images of the past by sources and you [should] start with the primary [contextual] sources that first hand that eywitnesses the documents that close up, you move out to the others depending on what you have got , 

 Wood:...and if you are going to deny that Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare, you deny the primary sources like the Will, 

so it is rubbish ...and nobody of the time thought that and for long after thought that anybody else but Shakespeare wrote Shakspeare,  ( be aware :thats devious! " see B-Wildenthals VIDEO- below!)    

 it 's 19th century fantasy, and unfortunately it's a conspiracy theory  - you know- you have got to look to  the recent American election  there is still a lot of people to think the moon landing didn't happen,  but it is as bonkers as that,  behind it lies a kind of ignorance, and the ignorance is about Tudors Society ....So it is Nonsense on a total level,..." 

_________________________

Michael Wood : a likable but shocking Ignorant on a total Level! What a shame!

                                                 Michael Wood's  embarassing ignorance  

                                            on the issue of a Shakespeare authorship problem!

Bryan Wildenthal: Early Shakespeare Doubts

(540) The great deception, Shakekespeares true identity..

Christopher Marlowe ("The true Shakespeare") 

deadly threatened because of high treason and heresy

 had to fake his death  and change identity and Name

 with the help of the crown. 

The V I DE O deals with a contemporary 

 poet and translator "Josuah Sylvester", 

and why his name  must belong to  the multiple pseudonyms 

of the "true" Shakespeare".  (Christopher Marlowe)

___________________

Josuah Sylvester

click this  V I D E O !

(539) Ros Barbers logical fallacies on Shakespeare Authorship Mystery Day.

Is she aware of the problem of "negative circular reasoning"? 

Circular Reasoning

On Nov, 8th 2018  the Second Annual 

Shakespeare Authorship Mystery Day celebration

 took place with  a live stream introduction

 by former Marlowian Ros Barber. 

There she formulated:

https://www.facebook.com/96412830317/videos/1580359555442975/

Barber: (at min 29:50)   "..... shortly after 1594....the name, either the initials W.S. or name Shakespeare started appearing on plays that actually are not his, 

that we know aren't his. 

So there were 7 plays that are part of the Shakespeare Apocrypha which means that they were at one point attributed to Shakespeare,

 we now know for sure they were not written by Shakespeare

 and its very interesting to me that these plays some of which are performed by that company end up beeing published with name or initials of William Shakespeare...it backs up the broker theory   "

How - on earth - can Ros Barber assert that the plays  "The London Prodigal" or "The Yorkshire Tragedy" were not written by Shakespeare.?.. Barber has not even defined if she means William from Stratford or the concealed poet genius, the"true Shakespeare" who must have used the name "Shakespeare" as a pseudonym or pen-name, ( her own live stream is arguing for.)

I suspect that Barber has not even noticed which  logical error of thinking she accomplished.  Let me explain this with a single example:

 This is classical "negative circular reasoning".

                                                   See 1.)Video on Apocrypha

and 2.)  Video on Logical Fallacies ( Circular Reasoning)

(538) It is not enough today to tackle only half of the Shakespeare authorship problem.

Why Keir Cutler never dared to tackle the second part of a dual (2part)  authorship  problem or question?

part 1.)    William Shaksper (Stratford ) is - by no means-  identical with  William Shakespeare, 

                                                              the author of Hamlet, Macbeth, Othello etc ?

part 2.)   Who really is behind the pseudonym William Shakespeare?



                                             Keir Cutlers new Video

A plausible Proposal