(513) Unnoticed handwriting / signature of Christopher Marlowe, 18 days prior to his alleged murder?

 Unnoticed Handwriting of Marlowe (alias Shakespeare)

In the Collection items of the British Library  you may read  some interesting  handwritten material related to the well known accusations  against Christopher Marlowe by Richard Baines and others.   (The Harley Manuscript 6484)

Black ink:    vile hereticall conceit

                      denying the deity of Jesus

                      Christ opher ........     found 

                      amongst the papers of Thos.

                      Kydd prisoner .- 

Brown ink:    he affirmeth that he

                      had from Marlowe

On a paper sheet between  two pages numbered by pencil 189/190, you  detect a short handwritten  "2-part note" dated 12 May 1593, [ 18 days prior to Marlowe’s alleged murther!!]
The first part of this note (Black ink) dealing  with the contents of Thomas Kyds heretical conceits………….
The second part (Brown ink, added later)  deals with  the possible origin of the conceits by Marlowe, the total notes

ressembling  Marlowes handwriting  of his single existing signature.

(512) Faustus and Hamlet reflecting a single author: Marlowe alias Shakespeare

 Faustus and Hamlet reflecting a single author:  Marlowe alias Shakespeare 

 reflect Video: 

No-one can seriously assume, that the Plays of Prince Hamlet and Dr. Faustus are pure literary fiction: 

They contain significant autobiographical connections 

to the "true" Shakespeare [alias Marlowe] 

—————————-

"Doktor Faustus" (The play, by C.Marlowe ) ....was performed in London prior to 1593 and staged successfully 25 times between  1594 and  1597. A modified textual revival after 1602 was printed for the first time in 1604.

"Hamlet"(The play, by W.Shakespeare) . There are no references to early performances of Hamlet in London. Surviving texts suggest that the author added passages, after the play had been in performance for a  while, prior to 1600.  It was first printed  in 1603 (Q1) and a second time in 1604 (Q2) after a considerable  revision of the text.

The conclusion of the Video : +

                       Marlowe in 1616 "officially" dead for almost 25 years, was alive!
There are no reason or motives why the B-Text (Faustus) was kept under lock for a quarter of a century and  who else but the author himself  could have added such late significant "biographical" information in view of the proximate death (1616) of his "literary dummy" "Shakspeare" from Stratford.

                                                                       C L I C K    V I D E O !

Denying the [virtually unimaginable] possibility of Shakespeare having been a [Pen] Name of Marlowe as taken from a "real" provincial Stratford frontman will  prevent a plausible solution to the century old unspeakable Shakespeareauthorship controversy.