Where does "Oxfordianism" actually get the hope from, of ever gaining general acceptance of its theory? (a century after Looney!)
A dead end story!?
An infinite way to an unavailing success!?
A QUESTION OF UNDERSTANDING
What is the main interest (main goal? main question?) of the
... to prove that ...
1. The Oxford theory is absolute nonsense!
2. The Stratfordman theory is and will remain the gold
3. The world still needs a more coherent theory!
(594) Nicholas Breton : a Pseudonym of the "true" Shakespeare. (Not to be confused with the Stratfordman)
In this video a series of contextual
arguments have been compiled that make it
compelling, logical and plausible that the
author "Nicholas Breton", contemporary to
Shakespeare and unidentifiable in his
lifetime (beyond his works), must have been
a Penname or literary Pseudonym of
Marlowe. [aka Shake-speare]
It remains utterly inexplicable why generations of literary scholars have not even attempted to enlighten and understand
a) what autobiographical and deeper meaningful contents lay behind the complex texts, the poetry and philosophy of the prolific genius Nicholas Breton,
b) who this productive, witty contemporary of Shakespeare actually was and
c) why Breton does not even belong to the devious list of todays discussed Shakspeare authorship candidates?
A great event has happened.....a milestone
"As of August 1, 2020,
all texts produced under EEBO Phase I and Phase II
I became aware of "Langton lite", with 2 posts on the Authorship issue.- What a surprise, new Marlowian efforts at the horizon ?
, …my key question to Dr.Christian Taylor. : what is his main reason to rehash (at this moment) a century old terribly stale taboo discussion on all the damn old topics (spelling, correspondence, biographical contents, the will, illiterate family etc. etc. etc.
Where is the solution supposed to come from, if not from a radical turnaround in traditional views?
A complete new "Marlowianism"?
It seems not likely that a more logic and more plausible „conspiracy authorship thesis“ (than the Multi-pseudonymity thesis of poet genius and former Superstar of the London Theater ) will arise. It may even well be, that a global intelligence will never be able or ready to understand and resolve the complexity of the authorship problem, let alone the singular virtually inconceivable mental capacity of the singular „true“ Shakespeare [Marlowe].
Multi-Pseudonymity thesis of Marlowe
Collected single Argument s
(590) Sturrocks „Combined Statistical Significance of the cryptograms“: False supposition, wrong Conclusion! A Hanky-Panky!
Discussing Alexander Waughs YouTube contribution
——-> „Edward de Vere
... decoding the dedicatory text of Shakespeare‘s Sonnets
Alexander Waugh recommended to read the Journal of Scientific Exploration (SSE) vol.34 no.2.pp268-350 (15 June 2020) by answering : „ Decoding the dedication of Shakespeare‘s Sonnets. by Prof. Peter Sturrocks , Stanford which demonstrates that the combined statistical significance of the cryptograms is overwhelming.„
The opinion of the Marlowian Pal Faklen (Budapest) on Sturrocks case, is, „that even a sophisticated method (combined statistical significance etc.) can not prove a statement which is based on a wrong premise.- Faklen concised his view in a chart (s. below)
When will Marlowe ever get his chance?
The (MSA) Marlowe Society of America held its 8th International Conference from 10–13 July, 2018 in Wittenberg, Germany, an important historic center of both religion and culture in sixteenth-century Germany….its university (now known as the "Leucorea") was made the alma mater of Shakespeare's Hamlet ("Let not thy mother lose her prayers, Hamlet: / I pray thee, stay with us; go not to Wittenberg."). The town also served as backdrop for the B-Text Doctor Faustus, the locale where Faustus first "surfeits upon cursed necromancy" and where his life ends "All torn asunder by the hand of death!"
Could MSA organize a conference with 70 lecturers without sponsorship? No....it is obvious that sponsorship depended on the INTANGIBILITY Of THE STRATFORD DOGMA . Crossing this sacred frontier, (by dealing with the Marlowe / Shakespeare authorship) the conference and MSA would have had no chance to get institutional financial support.
The International Marlowe Conference featured keynote presentations by all the ultra-dogmatic Stratfordian scholars such as Lukas Erne (University of Geneva), Kristen Poole (University of Delaware), Holger Syme (University of Toronto) , and Meghan C. Andrews (s.below!) and many more.
Be aware, Marlowe ( if he is not Shakespeare) is licensed for research (only) but not for the prohibited zone of plausible theories , the entrance is advisable only for those who are really independent and free, who have nothing to lose , who are no longer hurt when the official exorcist supervisors of literature signify that "doubting is mental illness " (J. D. Dixon) and these who disobey the blind „Stratfordian or Oxfordian“ faith " are just crazy" (Stanley Wells). And they call themselves scholars?!
Look at the long Marlowe resources bibliography on the MSA home page. And look at the much longer Shakespeare bibliographies anywhere in the world. An army of researchers will have to face that their work (sometimes life work) is a pile of scientific garbage. As long as this consacrated legend reigns, it's a better choice for them to accept benefits, job, professional advancement, prestige, reputation instead of risking „Career Suicide“.- Their price is to accept also the rules of silence (omerta), and put the common sense in the wardrobe — or even better in the safe.
In Wittenberg Megan C.Andrews gave a speech on Michael Drayton ,
earlier she had published an interesting article entitled
For the reasons mentioned above (“Career suicide“), in her article (and at the conference) she didn‘t even dare to discuss a plausible possible Marlowe / Shakspere connection, which assumes, that (surviving) Marlowe wrote under a multiplicity of pennames including Michael Drayton ...
What a shame. -
YOUNG PEOPLE SHOULD BE MORE CRITICAL
AND NOT SO FAITHFUL
|Alexander Waugh |
With an inner joy they express that they „survived that onslaught, and every other one since including The Stritmatterian Big Fist, the Declaration of Reasonable Unreason, the Wavian Teflon Fortress“ and here they „are still doing business.“
You learn ...
B) that „there are better candidates ...and alternative candidates.... Most of them better than the Earl of Oxford. „. A heavily commented part of the site.
Strangely enough you find a chapter about Christopher Marlowe's candidacy …claiming that it „has a great deal going for it“.... You learn from Oxfrauds website:
...the rules of Common Sense: Formulated and written by Oxfraud !
a pioneering playwright,
a superb poet and
a consummate craftsman.
Stylometry even places his vocabulary nearest to the vocabulary used in the canon (Oxford's is out by from here to Venus).
almost identical to the gaps in Shakespeare's knowledge.
need not be improvised from fable as the evidence is all solid.
no need for feeble pseudonymy or
the invention of claptrap like 'the stigma of print'.
does not require the incredible invention of a second Shakespeare
to explain away topical references.
who during his entire lifetime (... especially in his 25 years in London) never communicated (by any note, sentence or letter) with any publicly known person....
accused of Treason & Heresy)
The greatest stage writer in the world was, of course, the most talented person of his time or maybe of all time? However, he is said to have taken the blank verse from Christopher Marlowe. Two geniuses born in the same year and one copying from the other, so to speak?
, one Poet genius (W.S.) appears on the literary stage when the other (C.M.) has just died! He died in a knife fight in 1593 because of a bill to pay for food and drinks among friends!
In 1599 Christopher Marlowe enrolled in the seminary in Valladolid and in 1602 the head of this seminar reported to the Crown Council in London that he had noticed a Christopher Marlor (aka Matthew) and that he was planning to go to London.
In 1604, after his release from a London prison, Christopher Marlowe was issued an invoice for his 7-week prison sentence, which, however, was sent directly to the head of the Crown Council, Robert Cecil!
By the way, Christopher Marlowe studied in Cambridge at the same time as Robert Cecil - who eventually became the second most powerful man in England after Jakob I.
Aren't creative people always looking for stories like this?
In 2018, I sent an open letter to SOF as a test balloon, so to speak, without expecting an answer to follow....
Shakespeare plays are presented every day in every country in the world. Many plays, movies, symphonies, and operas are based on his writings. His writings impact our daily speech. Yet, the majority of the world doesn’t know his real biography. That by itself should lead to a renewal of interpretation of his works. There are many allusions that were topical to personalities of his time. To investigate these allusions would create a new Shakespeare Renaissance. People should be interested in the truth.
Yet, Marlowians are ignored by almost all of Academia, the press and the population at large. Nobody seems to care. Marlowians are treated like an irrelevant fringe cult! They are even more untouchable than Oxfordians Untouchable! Very few in academia will admit to even reading evidence about Marlowe:
• They ignored the seminal discovery by Leslie Hotson in 1925 or Calvin Hofmann 1955 etc etc-
• They ignore the 2007 Shakespeare Authorship Coalition’s “Declaration of Reasonable Doubt about the Identity of William Shakespeare,”which has been signed by over four thousand people now, including many Marlowians.
• They ignore Richard Roe’s 2010 book, The Shakespeare Guide to Italy, which demonstrates that the author traveled to Venice, Padua, Verona, Florence, and other places where the Shakespeare plays take place. We can deduce that Marlowe visited at least 8 times Italy ,( as early as 1574 as page boy for 10 months) but there is no evidence that Shakspere of Stratford ever left England.
• They ignore Samuel Blumenfelds and Daryl Pinksen biographies of Marlowe ( and several others) 2008, , in which (auto) biographical aspects of Marlowe are heavily represented.
Stratfordians claim that Shakespeare was a GENIUS who had an outstanding imagination and therefore the plays do not reflect his life. Absurd! Everyone’s work—in literature, painting, music, science—reflects one’s experience, education and travel.
Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon is not known to have had ANY education, and his parents, wife and children were illiterate. His will shows that he did not own any books at all, not even a family bible, or copies of Shakespeare’s plays or poems that had been printed at that time. Neither he nor his family ever claimed that he was a writer (there is no evidence that he ever even wrote a letter!), never mind the author of some spectacular poems and plays. Many of the sources of the plays were available only in foreign languages—like Italian, French, Greek, and Latin. How could he read them? Marlowe, we know, was fluent in at least 8 languages and had access to these sources. Marlowe was praised by many of his contemporaries as the best writers of his time, but one whose “identity and name ” had to be concealed throughout his long life. ,” as stated in a book published in 2016 (5th edition) ! Was it an open secret? Remarkably, 7 plays (printed with his name only after his presumed death) have survived but many others have been printed also under a series pseudonyms (Such as Drayton, Wither, Breton Barnfield, Basse and many more)
When anyone with an inquiring mind wishes to investigate the authorship question, they will turn to what the “experts” have to say. The “experts” are the professors of the leading universities, Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Stanford, etc. Yet these “experts” refuse to discuss the matter. The famous Shakespearean actors, Sir Derek Jacobi and Sir Mark Rylance, have been ignored and ridiculed in England by Academic professors for questioning the Shakespeare Authorship. An astrophysics professor at Stanford, Peter Sturrock, who wrote AKA Shakespeare: a Scientific Approach to the Authorship Question, has great difficulty in getting English professors to respond to his inquiries. One of his rare responses was, “You will never get me to believe that the works of Shakespeare were not written by the man from Stratford.” This is a Catch-22. It reminds me of the story that Galileo, having been the first to see the moons of Jupiter through his telescope, invited a math professor to take a look through the telescope; the professor declined because, he said, he knew there was nothing to see. “Experts” like these quash all inquiry and discussion, the opposite of what a University is supposed to foster.
A new documentary by Michael Rubbo , Much ado about something , is long out and discusses FACTS about Marlowe. Marlowians need contacts in the media that will interview them. We are initiating Podcasts on the SAQ.
This is what Marlowians need you to do:
1. Forward this to all your friends, family, colleagues, or anyone who you think might be interested in this dramatic cover-up.
2. . Ask your friends and family to join the Marlowe authorship thesis, and if possible, spread the strongest arguments.
3. If you know anyone in the media (TV, radio, cable, local paper, local access channel) contact them, send them a personal note and a copy of this email. Have them interview you. We will join you if possible, and if not, send you marketing material.
4. If you don’t know how to do it, have your kid or grandkid post this on all social media: Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Have them create a hashtag such as #TheRealShakespeare or #400YearOldHoax.
5. Spread the word through your personal network: friends, civic clubs, community centers, etc. You’d be surprised how people that don’t know much about Shakespeare become riveted by this story.
6. Link the Marlowe website and youtube to your online posts.
7. Let us know if you can get the mikr Rubbo documentary screened anywhere.
GET THE WORD OUT!
Marlowian by far have the best cards.. It had to be Christopher Marlowe! — get used to it!
No more “fake news”! We need to educate the world about the complex truth of a fascinating real literary historical conspiracy story