About Me
March 26, 2026
(788) . Inflation of Shakespeare Authorship-Videos within a few years.(42)
(Oxfordian). Bryan H. Wildenthal
Early Authorship Doubts:
——>from the Very Beginning
(787). 786). Inflation of Shakespeare Authorship-Videos within a few years.(41)
K E I R C U T L E R
Shakespeare Authorship Question :
E X P L A I N E D!
https://youtu.be/_uA_QYel2PM?is=gkcGUgbTqHf2w5_g
Z
March 25, 2026
(786). Inflation of Shakespeare Authorship-Videos within a few years.(40)
What Do We Really Know
a complete compilation of all discovered documents
concerning William Shakspere from Stratford”
A V I D E O M E E T I N G
What do we really know as fact about William Shakspere of Stratford-upon-Avon, the man some people believe wrote the literary works attributed to “Shakespeare”? And how do we know what we say we “know”? What is fact and what is fiction among the legends that have grown up around this most unlikely candidate as the celebrated Bard?.
You’ll be astonished how much of what you believe simply isn’t true.
(785) Inflation of Shakespeare Authorship-Videos within a few years.(39)
THE OXFORDIAN PERSPECTIVE
https://youtu.be/5q8O_hJtjMo?is=9v433kkF26ngKYPb
Shakespeare’s plays and poems have enthralled innumerable people over the centuries . Yet most continue to ask who was this phenomenal author? English academic elite continues to maintain their traditional conjectures supporting the Stratford Man as the true author.
Oxfordians specifically claim to have discovered a substantial amount of new data that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford is the real author behind the Shakespeare pseudonym.
This video presentation reshapes the Shakespeare Authorship Question with new historical data aiming to show why de Vere was unable to use his (own) name or take credit for writing his plays, poems, and sonnets.
March 24, 2026
(784) Theatricality in Audley End Annotations, by MARLOWE (=TRUE SHAKESPEARE)
Roger Strittmatter: The Audley End Annotations
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6ujTnD9C1sE&t=1s
A MARLOVIAN VIEW
The strongest arguments linking Christopher Marlowe to the intellectual world reflected in the library of Audley End House lies in a precise match of reading culture and mental habits: Marlowe’s works display
an exceptional command of Greek and Latin authors—
used in a way characteristic of elite humanist readers who actively annotated texts with political, rhetorical, and cross-referential marginalia;
Marlowes’ s translation of Lucan and his Tacitean sense of power, surveillance, and tyranny align exactly with the kinds of heavily worked classical books known to circulate in aristocratic, court-connected libraries like those of Thomas Howard, 1st Earl of Suffolk; moreover, the density, speed, and confidence with which Marlowe transforms classical material into drama strongly suggest not merely university learning but prolonged engagement with annotated texts typical of high-level courtly scholarship, making his intellectual profile far more consistent with the cultivated, politically attuned library environment of a great house like Audley End than with the narrower conditions of the commercial theatre alone——
R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
Study Complete (180)
A:). Marlowe/Shakespeare Authorship Video Archive:
https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550
Open Heading--> Home -->Videos -- Shorts -- Posts
->Popular
B:). Marlowe BLOGPOST(780)
https://the-true-shakespeare.blogspot.com/
(783) The. unsurmountable -1 6 0 4 - O X F O R D. P R O B L E M
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HxC9homcd7g&t=1s
The Anti-Oxfordian argument goes that Edward de Vere could not have written Shakespeare’s works because he died in 1604 and numerous Shakespeare plays appeared after that date. Ìt is argued that therafter there were no more revised play manuscripts and no more new works, but many works written before 1604 were released and played, thus Stratfordian play datings have long been disputed. The talk explores this and other issues related to the 1604 problem.
———————————-
My R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
Study Complete (180)
A:). Marlowe/Shakespeare Authorship Video Archive:
Open Heading--> Home -->Videos -- Shorts -- Posts
->Popular
B:). Marlowe BLOGPOST(780)
March 23, 2026
(782). Inflation of Shakespeare Authorship-Videos within a few years.(38)
The deep philosophical difference between the Oxfordian and Marlovian positions lies in what they believe literary authorship fundamentally expresses. The Oxfordian theory, following J. Thomas Looney, assumes that great literature is primarily the outward expression of social identity and lived status: the plays must come from the mind of an aristocrat because they display aristocratic consciousness, courtly values, and noble psychology — hence Edward de Vere.
The Marlovian view, centered on Christopher Marlowe, instead treats authorship as the unfolding of individual intellectual genius over time, independent of rank or social position; what matters is stylistic evolution, philosophical continuity, and the developmental trajectory of a singular creative mind.
In short:
Oxfordianism interprets Shakespeare through sociology (who the author must socially be), whereas Marlovianism interprets Shakespeare through intellectual biography (how a genius continues to think and write).
——————-
My R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
Study Complete (180)
A:). Marlowe/Shakespeare Authorship Video Archive:
Open Heading--> Home -->Videos -- Shorts -- Posts
->Popular
B:). Marlowe BLOGPOST(780)
March 22, 2026
(779). Thomas N A S H , A real person or a pseudonym for a hidden writer ??
This Video deals with the question about whether Thomas Nashe was a real person who wrote plays and pamphlets, or whether he was a pseudonym for a hidden writer.
There are defensible supposed „inner“ connection between Christopher Marlowe and Thomas Nashe , they rest on the fact,
that both were
a) near contemporaries
b) educated within the same Cambridge humanist environment
c) receiving identical rhetorical training that shaped their literary ambitions,
d) they operated later within the same London literary network alongside figures such as Robert Greene,
e) sharing printers, audiences, and theatrical culture;
f) Nashe explicitly praised Marlowe’s dramatic achievement in Pierce Penniless (1592), providing contemporary testimony of admiration and awareness; and
g) , both names appear on the 1594 title page of the play Dido, Queen of Carthage, indicating (?) recognized collaboration or contribution.
Beyond these „direct“ links, both writers emerged
h) simultaneously as professional authors living by their pens, engaged intellectually provocative and politically risky writing that attracted official scrutiny, and
i) participated in the same broader transformation of English literature around 1590, when classical rhetoric was being reshaped into new dramatic and prose forms;
Taken together, the documentary, social, and intellectual evidence establishes a historical association and shared milieu, BUT NO surviving LETTERS or eyewitness accounts prove a close personal friendship.
———————————-
VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:
OPEN —> Heading--> Home -->Videos -- Shorts -- Posts
->Popular
(778) Inflation of Shakespeare Authorship-Videos within a few years.(37)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_ePTWelmi84&t=1s
Towards a metaunderstanding of
the Shakespeare Authorship Debate
Summary of this video
The difficulty of getting the Shakespeare Authorship Question (SAQ) accepted by major academic institutions is a very complex problem with many connected causes. It involves social, institutional, cultural, and political influences.
Some pressures come from ideological movements that want to reduce or even remove Shakespeare from school curricula.
The traditional belief that William Shakespeare of Stratford wrote the works is presented as more than a historical opinion — it functions like a deep belief system, almost religious or metaphysical in nature, shaping values and attitudes.
Such comprehensive belief systems (according to philosopher John Rawls) should remain personal beliefs and should not be enforced in public institutions like education.
If Shakespeare’s life story were treated in a more secular, non-ideological way, it might also reduce tensions connected with movements such as #disrupttexts.
March 21, 2026
(777) Inflation of Shakespeare’s Authorship Videos within a few years (36)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HJ05AInocm4
The VIDEO presents the Shakespeare authorship question not as a historical problem to be solved but as a cultural mystery to be maintained.
Christopher Marlowe is mentioned, yet his role is structurally contained: he is introduced with admiration, briefly dramatized through the Deptford episode, and then neutralized by appeals to scholarly uncertainty rather than evidence.
The documentary follows a modern “mystery-entertainment” model in which all candidates receive equal narrative weight, preventing any single explanation from becoming decisive. Marlowe is therefore acknowledged but cognitively diluted — validated emotionally while minimized intellectually.
The film replaces investigation with balance, and argument with atmosphere. Its hidden thesis is that the fascination of uncertainty matters more than historical resolution. This reflects a broader media trend: instead of refuting the Marlovian case directly, contemporary documentaries diffuse it by compression and “rapid transition.
The result is not a rejection of Marlowe, but a controlled containment that preserves
ambiguity as the final narrative goal.
————
Study A and B
A —. Complete Video Archive: some 180 videos related to the Marlowe/Shakespeare AUTHORSHIP
OPEN —> Heading--> ->Popular
======
B. —- Complete Marlowe BLOG post ( some 800)
March 19, 2026
(776) Greenblatt’s builds all of the preconditions required by the Marlowe/Shakespeare authorship hypothesis,
Stephen Greenblatt
A comparison of Greenblatt’s own statements about Marlowe that unintentionally support Marlovian arguments — an analysis many readers find surprisingly illuminating. With the help of ChatGPT!
Greenblatt vs. the Marlowe/Shakespeare Hypothesis
Marlowe as the Revolutionary Inventor of Shakespearean Drama
Greenblatt says
—Marlowe transformed English theatre before Shakespeare. Shakespeare’s early works strongly imitate Marlowe. Blank verse power and heroic rhetoric originate with Marlowe.
If one writer suddenly appears using fully developed Marlovian technique, the question arises: How did Shakespeare master instantly what Marlowe invented?
Continuity of style reflects continuity of authorship.
Greenblatt must explain radical stylistic continuity without personal continuity.
Marlowe’s Intellectual Range
Greenblatt emphasizes:
Marlowe possessed extraordinary: —classical learning—-philosophical daring— theological skepticism —linguistic brilliance
He repeatedly describes Marlowe as intellectually exceptional even among playwrights.
The Stratford figure leaves little documented evidence of comparable education or literary activity.
Greenblatt separates: — documented intellectual biography (Marlowe). — undocumented literary genius (Shakespeare)
The Marlovian hypothesis removes this asymmetry by unifying them.
Espionage and Secret Service Connections
Greenblatt accepts:
Marlowe likely worked for Elizabethan intelligence networks.
This implies: — covert identities, — political protection, —secrecy operations
A person already embedded in covert state structures is capable of operating under concealed identities.
Greenblatt accepts espionage secrecy — but rejects extended secrecy after 1593.
The boundary is methodological, not evidential.
Dangerous Religious and Political Views
Greenblatt portrays Marlowe as: -suspected atheist, — politically dangerous thinker, under investigation shortly before death
In 1593 accusations of atheism could mean execution.
Disappearance could be safer than trial.
Greenblatt’s position: Death ends the danger.
Greenblatt acknowledges motive for disappearance but does not pursue it as a historical possibility.
The Strange Circumstances of the Death
Greenblatt admits: — unusual company present, —government-connected witnesses, — highly specific inquest narrative, — rapid bureaucratic closure
He calls the case mysterious but ultimately accepts it.
He simultaneously stresses: — Elizabethan political manipulation, — espionage culture, —surveillance state
yet treats the official record as transparent.
The Marlovian reading treats the same facts as signs of staging.
Shakespeare’s Sudden Emergence (1593–1594)
Greenblatt notes: Shakespeare rises precisely when Marlowe disappears.— The theatrical landscape suddenly changes.
One genius dies exactly when another (of the same age) fully appears…
Psychological Continuity of Themes
Greenblatt repeatedly links Shakespearean themes to Marlovian ones: —ambition, —identity instability, — performance of self, power and transgression
He often writes as if Shakespeare is thinking through problems Marlowe began.
The development appears internally continuous rather than generational.
Greenblatt’s Own Concept of Self-Fashioning
Greenblatt’s famous concept:— self-fashioning — identity as something constructed and performed in Renaissance culture.
If identity is performative and strategic, then a writer adopting a sustained literary persona becomes historically conceivable.
Yet Greenblatt applies self-fashioning metaphorically, not biographically.
The Narrative Necessity of Separation
Greenblatt’s historical storytelling depends on:
- Marlowe = tragic precursor
- Shakespeare = fulfilled successor
This creates a powerful literary narrative arc. Accepting identity continuity would dissolve that structure.
Thus resistance is partly narrative coherence, not only evidence.
Core Structural Insight
Greenblatt’s scholarship simultaneously asserts:
- Elizabethan England was a world of surveillance, secrecy, and constructed identities.
- Marlowe lived inside that covert world.
- Shakespeare continues Marlowe’s artistic revolution seamlessly.
Yet Greenblatt maintains a strict boundary at 1593
because academic historiography prefers visible continuity over hidden continuity.
Conclusion
Greenblatt’s portrait of Marlowe unintentionally builds all of the preconditions required by the Marlovian hypothesis,
but his historical method prevents him from crossing the final interpretive step.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)