(715) 5 of Shakespeares many PSEUDONYMS

 

(714) Tomas Lodge‘s Role in the Shakespeare Authorship Mystery.

The Shakespeare  Authorship Mystery will only become solvable, when the wise part of a our literary and theatrical world community begins to accept, that the only "TRUE" english universal poet genius Christopher MARLOWE did not die but survived , by writing under a Multiplicity of Pennames (as SHAKESPEARE and many others, including Thomas LODGE )

For interesting Details study the VIDEO  below!

 https://youtu.be/PSPLjkn3cBk?si=Rk-KLiQ7XEdwdfxo

(713) the justified Shakespeare Authorship question can only ( & must be) tackled in a 2 Step procedure!

The 2 Stage(Step)  procedure!

Stage 1 — The Negative Stage: Deconstruction of Stratfordian Orthodoxy

Stage 2 — The Positive Stage: Reconstruction of the True Author

———-

  i copied here  from the Blog 457 (Link below) of my Marlowe Blog Web Page!

https://draft.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/4224101577440702451/5152981677306964583

The authorship Problem consists of  2 separate  consecutive steps of solution approach.. 

________________

First Illustration (left - click link below!) of Shakespeare "
 In William Dugdale's: The Antiquities of Warwickshire illustrated 
1656 compared to the Stratford monument today   

- Step 1: Why it was not (or could not possibly have been)  William of Stratford? 

 [..,  some reasons.e.g.Video 1/Video2
 the Author of "Hamlet" or "Venus and Adonis" . ]

I assume Step 1 would be accepted by a majority of farsighted critical and rationally thinking people, (...not to be confused with  Shakespeare Academics, their acceptance of step1  would mean  "Career Suicide")  if  for  the consecutive second Step a rationale answer would or could  have been found  

- Step 2:  Since  William of Stratford was not the author, then who was it? - 

Why  no logic and  definite solution of this crucial 2nd step and question could be achieved for 2 centuries: Why instead a factual problem  was endlessly  ridiculed by discussing 75 candidates and disposing it at the landfill of conspiracy theories?

---

https://archive.org/stream/antiquitiesofwar00dugd#page/520/mode/2up

There seems to be  a clear dilemma: 
First Step  and Second Step cancel each other out:   they are mutually dependent!

Some famous Non-Stratfordians

To repeat myself:  after a century of  arguments assembled there is no longer a logical compelling necessity to accept  the First Step,  (i.e. to recognize William from  Stratford as the true author of Hamlet, Romeo &Juliet etc.) :  there are definitely not sufficient plausible arguments that William of Stratford was a literary Polymath!  

Otherwise  over centuries a community of "Non-Stratfordians"  would never have been formed.

But even today Non-Stratfordians (such as Diana Price,  a.o.  ) committing the deplorable error to concentrate on Step 1...and seem to fear the second step as the devil the holy water.

Thus the more complex Second Step has not even begun to be analysed,  discussed or understood---and that's why the solution of the  unique authorship issue meanwhile   stagnates for a century!...

A breakthrough in solving the fundamental  authorship issue will only be possible, when  we definitely close [for a while] the trail 1[step1], concentrate on trail 2[step2] and  study the consequences of  thoughts which have not been thought through.-  

Only by finding Trail 2  we will be able  to find the Exit.

The Thesis of a Marlowe /Shakespeare Authorship plot is by far the most plausible one ! 

Lets follow the Trail of Marlowes survival that actually happened! (at the expense of the change of  his Name and Identity)

It seems that famous Engl.Marlowian Ros BARBER followed this Trail., in a cerain way.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SZorTWVfHs0&t= 

(712) Marlowe as Shakespeare‘s Co-Author.

 Oxford University Press 

announced (2016) its new edition of Shakespeare's complete work will name…

…Christopher Marlowe as a co-author. .

…….

(711) Malcolm Elliot The links between Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespear

Malcolm Elliot  -

linking  Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespeare

                                                                    

        Malcolm Elliot (screen shot)

 

Malcolm Elliots book (2016)

CHRISTOPHER SHAKESPEARE

————

Very last paragraph (excerpt) of the Book:

The question from the beginning:“ How 2 men of preternatural Genius emerged in England at the very same time, is satisfactorily resolved , if we accept the overwhelming evidence showing them [Christopher Marlowe  & [pseudonymous] William Shake-speare]] to have 

been

 One and the Same 

„We should just refer to them in future  as

„Christopher Shakespeare“

(710) Why Academic Stratfordianism is a House of Cards?

 Why Academic Stratfordianism

is a House of Cards?

The YouTube questions the academic theory of Shakespeare's authorship, known as Stratfordianism, in this video.

The speaker describes it as a "house of cards" that continues to be held by the global academic community despite its alleged flaws.

It argues that there is no evidence for the authorship of William Shakespeare of Stratford, and his will contains no evidence of a literary life.

The source suggests that adherence to this theory is based more on dogma, career interests, and the desire for a democratic genius myth than on truth. It is suggested that Christopher Marlowe is the most plausible and logic candidate for the Shakespeare authorship.

(709) ai (D E U T S C H !) Wer hat die Werke Shakespeare's wirklich geschrieben?

 ai Dialog (in Deutsch, nachdem NotebookLM in allen Sprachen verfügbar wurde):

------------------------------

Wer hat die Werke Shakespeare

wirklich geschrieben?

(708) What if everything You knew about Shakespeare was a Lie?

What if everything

You knew about Shakespeare

was a Lie?

This video presents the intriguing idea that William Shakespeare from Stratford-upon-Avon was not the actual author of the famous plays and poems.It highlights the lack of historical evidence connecting the Stratford man to the literary works.

Instead, the video suggests that Christopher Marlowe, a contemporary playwright, possessed the necessary background, education, and knowledge to have written the Shakespearean canon.

The theory proposes that Marlowe faked his reported death in 1593, to escape execution, and then continued to write under the pseudonym Shakespeare, noting that Shakespeare's plays began appearing shortly after Marlowe's supposed demise.

 

(707) Why the Shakespeare Authorship Problem even alfter almost 500 years wasn't solved

 Why the Shakespeare Authorship Problem

even alfter almost 500 years

wasn't solved?

---------------

Almost five centuries have passed… And yet one of the greatest literary mysteries still haunts us today: Who truly wrote the works that became world-famous under the name William Shakespeare?

Despite countless documents, academic studies,

and modern technologies— this question has never been answered. Why?

(706) When AI read SHAKESPEARE: Why it thinks he was MARLOWE?

 When AI  read SHAKESPEARE:   

Why it thinks he was MARLOWE?

 

(705) Ben Jonson , the absolute Key Witness of the Shakespeare Authorship riddle

Ben Jonson ,

the absolute Key Witness

of the Shakespeare Authorship riddle

the video is focusing on the apparent silence of Ben Jonson regarding William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon in his own writings. It argues that Jonson, a key contemporary, omitted direct mention of Shakespeare's name as part of a literary conspiracy to conceal the true identity of the author, who the source posits was Christopher Marlowe.

Jonson's works, including epitaphs and epigrams, contain hidden clues and allegories pointing to Marlowe writing under various pseudonyms, including "Shakespeare."

The central idea is that Marlowe faked his death and continued to write, with Jonson aiding in this deception through his cryptic references.

AI dialog on the Original VIDEO (below)

-----------------------

Original Video 

(704) Why BACON cannot have been TRUE Shakespeare?

 Why BACON cannot have been TRUE Shakespeare & thus is by no mens the real SHAKESPEARE CANDIDATE!

——-

Why Bacon and Shakespeare never ever met or communicated with each other?

——-

What about Toby Matthew?

ai Dialog Video (by NotebookLM)

about the ORIGINAL VIDEO (below)

--------------------------------

Original VIDEO

----------------------

(703) Shakespeare Authorship - A fictional comparison with MOZART

 Shakespeare Authorship -

A fictional comparison with MOZART

-------------------------------

The orig.videotext explores the long-standing Shakespeare authorship question by presenting a hypothetical scenario involving Mozart.

This thought experiment highlights the significant lack of contemporary evidence documenting Shakespeare's artistic life, contrasting it with what one would expect for a celebrated genius.

The author uses this comparison to suggest that the official account of Shakespeare's identity is flawed. Instead, the text proposes that Christopher Marlowe was the true poetic genius of the era, forced to write under pseudonyms, including "Shakespeare," to conceal his identity due to life-threatening circumstances, with the Stratford man serving as a public figurehead.

(702) No-body or Some-body - the author of the 4 King Edward Plays ??

 No-body or Some-body -

the author of the 4 King Edward Plays ??

--------------

ai dialog video

about the original Video(below)

o

Orignal Video

(701) Shakespeare's sonnets , 2nd edition reveal the true Author !

Shakespeare's sonnets ,

2nd edition reveal the true Author !

Ai Dialog about the original Video (below)

——————

Original Video

 

 

(700) Marlowe, exposed - The absurd Myth of the Stratford Man

 Marlowe,  exposed   - 

 The absurd Myth  of the  Stratford Man

-----------------

(699) the greatest literary hoax: Shakespeare & the STRATFORD MYTH

The greatest literary hoax: 

Shakespeare & the 

STRATFORD MYTH

(698) Why MARLOWE does not dominate the SHAKESPEARE authorship debate?

 Why MARLOWE

does not dominate the

SHAKESPEARE authorship debate?

................

--------------

(697) TOP 10 Arguments for MARLOWE as the only plausible 'TRUE' Shakespeare

 TOP 10

Arguments for MARLOWE

as the only plausible 'TRUE' Shakespeare

---------------

---------------------------------

for details study this VIDEO

(696) top 10 arguments against the BACON SHAKESPEARE authorship thesis

 TOP 10 arguments against

the B A C O N - SHAKESPEARE

authorship thesis

.................

-------------

(695) Debunking the Oxford - Shakespeare Authorship Thesis

 Debunking

the Oxford - Shakespeare Authorship

Thesis

12 A R G U M E N T S

------------

(694) Top 10 ARGUMENST against William Shakspere (Stratford) , as the author of HAMLET

 Top 10 ARGUMENTS

against William Shakspere (Stratford) ,

as the author of HAMLET

----------------------------------

This YouTube transcript argues against the traditional authorship of William Shakespeare, highlighting the lack of evidence (TOP 10 arguments) linking the Stratford man to the works attributed to him.

The video claims that Shakespeare's supposed lack of education, absence of personal writings, and the inconsistencies within his works point to another author.

It proposes Christopher Marlowe as a more likely candidate, possessing the necessary education and connections.

, the video calls for a reassessment of the Shakespearean canon based on historical evidence rather than entrenched myths.

(693) Dialog about Richard Niccols , " the editor (1610) of the Mirror of Magistrates

 Dialog about Richard N I C C O L S,  

last editor (1610) of "the Mirror of Magistrates".

----------------

the largely unknown Richard Niccols, who edited the 1610 edition of A Mirror for Magistrates, must have been a Pseudonym for "true"Shakespeare (= Marlowe). The argument hinges on stylistic similarities between Nichols’s works and Shakespeare’s, as well as biographical details within Niccols’s poems that align with events in Shakespeare’s life, suggesting a concealed autobiographical connection.

--------

The video uses textual analysis of Nichols's poems, including "A Winter Night's Vision", "The Three Sisters' Tears", and Sir "Thomas Overbury's Vision", to support this claim. The presenter analyses the use of allegory, recurring motifs, and personal confessions to build their case. The overall thesis suggests that the 'obscure' Niccols was a carefully constructed literary persona used by 'true' Shakespeare (Concealed Marlowe) to publish works under a different identity.

ai Video Dialog on the original Video (below)

-----------------

Original Video

It makes no plausible or logical sense to attribute the authorship of pseudonymous Richard NICCOLS' works to anyone else than the

"TRUE" SHAKESPEARE (aka Marlowe)

(692) John EARLE, the actual smoking gun of the authorship of "TRUE" SHAKESPEARE

 John E A R L E ,

the actual smoking gun

of the authorship of "TRUE" SHAKESPEARE

.....

True Shakespeare, not John Earle, authored Micro-cosmography. The video’s central claim rests on the anonymity surrounding Micro-cosmography’s authorship, its publisher’s (Edw.Blount) connection to Shakespeare, and stylistic similar contents between the work and Shakespeare’s known writings.

Furthermore, the video explores the possibility of multiple Pseudonyms used by "true" Shakespeare, citing various epigrams as evidence.

the autobiographical elements within Micro-cosmography clearly point towards Shakespeare's authorship, contrasting it with the limited life experience of John Earle.

 ---------------------------------

ai Video Dialog on the Orignal VIDEO(bleow)

--------------------------

ORIGINAL- VIDEO

Deep undiscovered contextual insights into the real personality of The TRUE poet genius SHAKESPEARE. (alias MARLOWE)

For God's sake don't confuse him with the dummy, William from Stratford!

----------------------------------- Micro-cosmographie (Edit.1633) https://archive.org/details/microcosmograph02earlgoog/page/n10/mode/2up

(691) Conversation (Dialog) on a Youtube-Video about William Basse a Penname of 'TRUE SHAKESPEARE (Marlowe)

ai Dialog on a Youtube-Video 

about William B A S S E

a Penname of 'TRUE SHAKESPEARE 

(Marlowe)

---------------

ai Dialog ( by NotebookLM Google)

on a original youtube video (below)

-------------------------------------

Original Youtube 

(690) Conversation on the absurdity of the shakespeare authorship

  Conversation (Dialog) on the Absurdity 

  of the Shakespeare Authorship

.......

-----------------------------------------

(689) The 'true' Shakespeare and Markham, one of his multple pseudonyms,

 The 'true' Shakespeare

(not the Stratford man),

and Gervase Markham,

one of his multple pseudonyms,

----------------

(688) Shakespeare's authorship - the outrageous failure ; Stratfordianism for ever?

  Shakespeare's authorship -

 the outrageous failure 

 Stratfordianism for ever?

----------------------

(687) Dialog on a Youtube Video about Francis DAVISON, a SHAKESPARE/Marlowe's Pseudonym

 Dialog on a Youtube Video 

about  Francis D A V I S O N,  

a SHAKESPARE/Marlowe  Pseudonym

-------------------

Francis Davison, author of "A Poetical Rhapsody", must have been a pseudonym for Christopher Marlowe, the "true Shakespeare".

The argument rests on numerous textual parallels between Davison's works and Shakespeare's plays and poems, along with Davison's connections to individuals associated with Marlowe and the Elizabethan court.

stylistic similarities, shared allusions, and biographical details suggest a HIDDEN IDENTITY. Davison's writings are interpreted as containing coded messages and veiled confessions about Marlowe's life and exile.

The video aims to establish DAVISON as a literary mask for Marlowe, challenging traditional Shakespearean scholarship.

ai Dialog Video about Original Video(below)

_________________________________

Original Video

(686) ai Dialog on "Shakespeare’s Apocrypha: The Mystery of Three Disputed Plays"

ai Dialog on 

"Shakespeare’s Apocrypha:  

The Mystery of Three Disputed Plays"

-----------------

ai Dialog about the VIDEO (below)

----------------------------------------

Original Video 

This Video "Shakespeares Apocrypha”, specifically focusing on three plays,

The London Prodigal,

The Yorkshire Tragedy, and

Pericles, Prince of Tyre.

The video challenges the academic consensus that these plays were not written by William Shakespeare, arguing that their inclusion in later editions of Shakespeare's collected works, despite their omission from the first folio, supports the claim that they are authentic works of TRUE Shakespeare(Marlowe) .

The video further asserts t

hat the plays contain autobiographical elements relating to Christopher Marlowe, a contemporary playwright who allegedly died mysteriously in 1593. The video suggests that Marlowe may have felt threatened by his own conspiracy , leading him to conceal his True authorship of the plays, due to fear of persecution or an attempt to protect his legacy.

(685) Dialog on the waterpoet John TAYLOR , a faked identity of TRUE Shakespeare

The waterpoet John TAYLOR ,

 a faked identity of TRUE Shakespeare.

--------------

The video transcript is arguing that John Taylor, the Water Poet, was a pseudonym used by Christopher Marlowe, a playwright who was believed to have died in 1593.

The video presents several inconsistencies between known facts about John Taylor's life and the details provided in his works, suggesting that he was actually a fictional persona created by Marlowe to continue writing after his presumed death. The transcript examines Taylor's first published work,

The Sculler (1612), and later writings, highlighting contradictions in his biography, his supposed rise to fame, and the allusions to his personal life. The video concludes that Marlowe's use of pseudonyms explains the inconsistencies in Taylor's writings, and Marlowe' deaths was staged to allow him to continue his literary career under different identities.

ai Dialog Video about a Youtube Video   (s Oiginal below)

----------------

Original Youtube Video