Share this information

Share this information

(623) Isn' it urgent time to rethink the P R O - 'Stratfordian' Position?


These 2 figures represent the most  (and only ) authentic contemporary depictions of 

William Shakspere from Stratford 
                                      & William Shakespeare (First Folio1623) 

                               _____________________  click VIDEO   _______________________________

They are by no means identical personalities

 The living William Shakspere from Stratford (to be seen as a bust in the Trinity church of Stratford ) was taken as the 'corrupted Peudonym' SHAKESPEARE ( copper engraving) in the collected dramatic works (so-called FF, First Folio 1623) as a cover for the only existing greatest English Poet-Genius (Christopher Marlowe) whose death had to be feigned for life-saving reasons.


Short Recap of the Marlowe Shakespeare authorship thesis

There was only one truly great poetic GENIUS in his time:  Christopher MARLOWE  (born in the same year 1564 as Shakspere/Stratford ) who in his 30th year of life (May 1593) was threatened by execution following slanderous accusation (of TREASON & Heresy) against him by the English Crown & Church. A feigned death staged in Deptford with the help of Marlowe's employer, the 'Senior Advisor' of Queen Elisabeth William Cecil (Lord Burghley) saved him by  banishing him - for his own safety - but at the price of a permanent abandoning of identity & name, writing henceforth [ as already previously!] behind a CURTAIN of ALIAS & PSEUDONYMS such as 


Richard B A R N F I E L D, 

William B A S S E,  

Francis B E A U M O N T

Nicholas B R E T O N,  

George C H A P M A N, 

(Double) John DAVIES, 

Michael D R A Y T O N, 

(Triple) J+Ph+G F L E T C H E R,  

Thomas H E Y W O O D, 

Henry P E A C H A M, 

William S H A K E - S P E A R E,  

George W I T H E R,   

a. o.


      UNTHINKABLE and 

             LUDICROUS it may sound!

You may study singular detailed arguments for these names on this channel.(URL adress below the Video


(622)Twelfth Night or what you will. - Autobiographical from the 'real' Shakespeare.

 As long as the 'borrowed Stratfordman's Name' SHAKSPEARE is not recognized as the corrupted embellished ' FRONT-name SHAKESPEARE of poet GENIUS MARLOWE, the author- ship puzzle will not be resolvable!


(621) William GAGER, A critical letter from Prof.Dana Sutton

Dana  F. Sutton, Prof.Emeritus, University of California, Irvine answered some emails I had sent to him, asking him for his  opinion regarding the existence or non-existence of a Shakespeare  authorship problem : He responded exclusively to my Gager article, unfortunately not to the more interesting  basic idea of an authorship question
                                                He impressively referred to me as

The attention-craving exhibitionist....simply cavorting in public

Letter excerpt:.  emphasis(bold) by me.
..."   your effort concerning GAGER ... was silly, contemptible and altogether not worthy of a response…..I couldn’t help asking myself how in the world anybody might gain the impression that BOTH Gager and Marlowe could be “Shakespeare,” for at least two reasons: a.) Gager did all his worthwhile work in Latin, never in English (his few poems written in English are of rather poor quality)  and b.) his life is vastly better-documented than those of Shakespeare and Marlowe combined. It is almost as if you just picked the name of Gager out of a hat at random to have something to say. 
, I cannot help asking myself how a man with a presumptive commitment to the scientific method within his own area of expertise can play so fast and free with the facts regarding the Shakespeare authorship question as if that is an area in which reasonable standards of proof do not apply
There are some very good scholars (e. g. Nina Green and my Berkeley colleague Alan Nelson) who are convinced that Bacon = Shakespeare. I disagree with them but I respect them because they play the game by its accepted rules. There’s a world of difference between Bundesliga football and Aldous Huxley’s “centrifugal bumblepuppy” (=from Huxley's Brave New World) because the one game has a well-developed rulebook accepted by all its players and the other doesn’t, and there’s a world of difference between scholarship and simply cavorting in public as an attention-craving exhibitionist.


The Degree  of Concordances  between William GAGER & Christopher MARLOWE [ here seen as the only 'true' Shakespeare] seems  too massive, to be purely coincidental:

Arguments in this VIDEO 

1 Birthdate
 2 Canterbury Kings school 
  3 Oxford Study
   4 Study of Law (DCL)
    5 Reputation as Dramatist
     6 GAGER's contemporaneous Ranking
      7 Unconditional Question
       8 'D I D O'
        9 'H E R O  & LE A N D E R  
         10 GAGER / Chapman
          11 MELEAGER (Boas)
            12 MELEAGER (Dido&Tamburlaine)
              13 MELEAGER  (Essex)
                14 LUCRECE (Shakespeare)
                 15 ULYSSES  Mary Sidney
                  16 Handwriting
                   17 BRETON / Gager
                    18 Handwriting (+ Raynold)
                     19 Oedipus (Basse)
                      20 Oedipus (Wither)
                       21 Abrupt End of GAGER's Dramatist Career
                        22 University OXFORD's other POETs
                         23 POLIMANTEIA
                          24 Thomas BASTARD 
                           25 Richard BARNFIELD
                            26 CHRESTOLEROS(1)
                             27 CHRESTOLEROS(2)
                              28  PEELE /GAGER
                               29 King EDWARD I  play
                                30 etc. etc.



The 'O X F R A U D', a literary battaillon fighting for the 'Stratford-'Thesis against the 'Oxford-Theory, fighting a double loosing battle. Stratford-'Thesis = Wlliam Shaksper from Stratford Oxford-Theory, = the 17th Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere wrote HAMLET, KING LEAR , TIMON of Athens etc.

(619) Most liked Youtube Contribution of Alexander Waugh

82.842 'Likes'    14.09.2021

Alexander Waughs Youtube contribution (2018)
    Shakespeare was a Fake (..and I can prove it)
    with 957 commentaries !!!


                               What a pity that Alexander is on the wrong track. -

My conviction
It really didn‘t need such sophisticated decoding or ‘‘apophenic‘‘ deciphering but instead a decade of reading, understanding and interpreting the immense contemporary 'contextual' literature, to reach the irrefutable conclusion, that the ‘true or real‘ SHAKE-SPEARE can only have been SOMEONE with a pre-viously unpresented number of Pseudonyms, changed again & again. ..  such as SHAKESPEARE, DRAYTON,  CHAPMAN; BARNFIELD;  BASSE; BRETON, HEYWOOD, TAYLOR,  WITHER etc etc.

Christopher MARLOWE : 
   (   Reflect collected Arguments for that assumption 
               from  60 Youtube VIDEO’S)



             The most intelligent commentary (in my opinion)
             to A.Waugh's contribution:
                                       from 'bouncy house'

"Why would anyone go to such extremes of complication and subterfuge to hide someone they wanted ultimately to be found?"

(618) TIMON of ATHENS : Autobiograhical of the 'true'' SHAKESPEARE!

 A definite (yet unrecognized) autobiographical play of the 'true' SHAKESPEARE

You should note the matchless artistic skills of the the ''true'' Shakespeare on his Tragedy 


He dialectically divided himself into  3 different selfs 

that embody:




(617) WIlliam GAGER the real or true Shakespeare ?

William GAGER  an early  penname of the  real or true Shakespeare (MARLOWE)


(616) A Stunning Turnaraound of Oxfordian Alexander Waugh?? Has he become a Marlowian?

Recently I watched  a ZOOM Webinar  with Alexander Waugh which premiered on Dec.20020

I recorded and copied 2 Interesting stunning minutes starting at 01:55.42

Marlowe exists,  ... as a separate entity

TRANSCRIPT:   Life Event 12 Dec 2020 WEBINAR 

Read what Alexander Waugh expressed:  


 A GUESS (?)


" I would just say: it's a sidely (?), weird and fantastical theory, but I don‘t wonder if Marlowe exists, as a separate entity,  a separate name, from the great Shakespeare… school,  and there are all these experts and are telling us  that his hand is all over some of the Shakespeare plays ..Henry VI particularly    …tell us that he exists,  a separate entity, possibly because Edward de Vere could not stand  the sight of him  after he realized his atheism  and that therefore his contribution the Shakespeare Canon  which may have included EDWARD II  and things like that, they were sort of let loose and they got a life of their own  and hence Marlowe has this great name for him self .- Just an Idea,…it’s a guess."


(615) 2 different versions of the Shakespeare play "The Taming of a / the Shrew"

2 different versions of the Shakespeare play "The Taming of a / the Shrew"

[lying almost 30 years apart! ]

A, The Taming of 'A' Shrew: an Anonymous Q1 version (printed in 1594)

B, The Taming of 'THE' Shrew: The Shakespeare First Folio version (printed in 1623).

Both plays must have been written by a singular author, Christopher Marlowe, the only "true" or real" Shakespeare:

(614) Why Shakespeare and Francis Bacon never (ever) met or communicated with each other?

This 55 min VIDEO collects arguments, 
why the only 'absolute' POET-GENIUS  of his age

Christopher MARLOWE used

A   'SHAKESPEARE '/' QUARLES'  as one of his first and  last literary PSEUDO-NAMEs

B    Tobie MATHEW as an almost  life-long INCOGNITO NAME and 

C    Francis BACON as his lifelong most estimated 'personal friend,  


(613) The North SHAKESPEARE Enigma

 THOMAS  & GEORGE  N O R T H,  A famous double of plagiarist in the late 1570ies of Shakespeare's plays ??


.Proposed solution of the North / Shakespeare riddle

A thousand identical text parallels between NORTH and SHAKESPEARE (like fingerprints) cannot have emerged from 2 different, but only from 1 singular subject (and brain!)


This 'singular' brain belonged to the only existing  'true'  concealed 

       poet GENIUS and 

only dramatist GENIUS of its time:

Christopher Marlowe


(612) Shakespere's Collaborators?

                                     The Video argues

that J.F. (John Fletcher)  belongs to the Pseudo-Initials of MARLOWE,!   only under this condition it becomes understandable and logical, that he did not collaborate, but - alone - was the true poet-genius writing under his Frontmans name SHAKSPEARE  

                      the' King  HENRY VIII play'. 

It is more plausible that a single dramatist genius was the author of the King HENRY VIII play!

           .a hidden author revealing himself in the play as Ambassador Capucius...  

                   MARLOWE was writing under PSEUDO-NAMEs (or PSEUDO-INITIALS J.F. 

                                                                                  such as 

                 SHAKE-SPEARE  & FLETCHERs (John F.,  Giles F.,  Phineas F.) 

         or PSEUDO-INITIALS such as J.F.(John Fletcher /  or John  Ford)?



(611) Shakespeare: A Freemason ?? -- Did A.Waugh deliberately overlook MARLOWE ?



From      Alexander Waugh's last Youtube

I learned that 

 a) "....Hermeticisms survived as the philosophical and theological Epicenter of Freemasonry.- ..." in England

 b) "....that one of the Key messages of Hermes (Trismegistos) is that he writes: "The greatest evil in mankind is then a guide to take you by the hand and lead you to the portals of knowledge that(?) te the light cleansed of all darkness...

 c) " who better to that than William Shakespeare who stands in Leicester Square carved in marble pointing to his own words : รค0pTHERE IS NO DARKNESS BUT IGNORANCE"

                           Shakespeare carved in Marble  at Leicester Square (London)

d) Waugh: " Shakespeare thus very close to the Hermetic philosophers and to Hermes..(Trismegistos)

 e) NOTE: it is more appropriate  to associate this Marble" phrase to Marlowe's famous sentence  in "The Jew of Malta"   :  I count religion but a childish toy, and hold there is no sin but ignorance. or Doktor Faustus and the Ignorance in knowledge 

 one can  take this as another logical and plausible   evidence that Marlowe 

 a) is identical with Shakespeare (his pseudonym)
b) that he is a predecessor of the Freemasons?

(610) Shake-speare: The first of Marlowe's TOP 10 Pseudonyms

The name Shake-speare is dealt with a list of the top 10 most significant Pseudonyms of a singular Poet and dramatist Genius 

Christopher Marlowe.

That Marlowe (aka Shake-speare) survived can only become conceivable when his incredibly great spirit was incredibly productive, writing under many pseudonyms, over a long period of life!


(609) Rodney Bolt - only recently became aware of his Marlowe reflection in 2005

Why did I become aware of such a fascinating 
personality so late?

Rodney Bolt

A great creative and imaginative book

A triumphant resurrection of the poet genius and dramatist Marlowe


(608) the incredible Shakespeare Bodenham Deception


The argument presented in this VIDEO favor the Idea that John BODENHAM must have been a PSEUDONYM, an ALIAS or PEN-NAME similar to SHAKE-SPEARE

and to many
other 'alleged' coworkers! of the contemporary poet-genius Christopher Marlowe

(607)Marlowe alias Shake-speare. The acceptance and need of contextual biographical proof

Literally, with all  Marlowian  I miss some fundamental reflections and research.


A Marlowian Theory cannot exist, i.e. doesn’t make any sense, as long as one does not assume that Marlowe survived.


If Marlowe (alias Shakespeare) survived, however, he must have had a specific biography for his surviving time. (up to 1655?)  And these life data & experiences must have been reflected in some (many?)  ways in texts of himself as of concealed pseudonymous poets, and by no means only in play texts of Shakespeare.


Can anybody even remotely accept that there is no need for any contextual autobiographical (poetical) evidence and (re)search?


These contextual massive autobiographical evidence in fact are and must be the cornerstones of the evidence, of circumstantial evidence and reasoning.


And Marlowian Daryl Pinksen (mirabile dictu!) doesn’t either have heard or ever listened to any line of all Youtube presentations or ever asked the crucial question what Marlowe might have done & written in all his surviving time? What a depressing confession of failure!

(606) Pal Faklen's (Budapest, Hungary) enlarged article "Marlowe's delayed resurrection.

As a longtime Marlowian, I recently discovered a  more detailed article of the hungarian publisher and editor Pal Faklen (Budapest) on the Marlowe Shakespeare  authorship issue (entitled "The Delayed Resurrection of Marlowe) which I naturally liked very much.

I very much hope that Pal Faklens essential and amazing arguments will receive (slowly, but at least) a gradual recognition world wide.


 Publication in




Please  forward the article to interested parties…

(604) The impressive hope of self-fulfilling prophecy of the OXFRAUDIANS


The Game is over !!! It's quiet !!  Really?

Lately, I became aware of the wonderful Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of the OXFRAUDSTheir belief or expectation about the Shakespeare Authorship is,  that the game is over.

At no time the OXFRAUDS had any real interest in finding out what about the centuries-old doubt is justified and what is not. The Marlowe Theory, despite Peter Farey, had no chance with them. They haven't even started, to reflect the Marlowe issue.

At no time the Oxfraud community had any real interest in finding out what about the centuries-old doubt is justified and what is not. And how to explain the unimaginable amount of inconsistencies. The Marlowe Theory, despite Peter Farey, did not have the slightest chance in their group. Wherever they could they made a fool of him and Marlowians like me , and even declared me as deceased(!). : a rather pitiable, ridiculous bunch when compared to the great minds of the Non-Stratfordians.

They do not even realize that they have very bad cards in the long run :

Their greatest strength (by far) : the personal insult,

their greatest weakness: the lack of a stringent argument

(to resolve any inconsistency)


(603) Shakespeare a mask, a dummy , a mockup

Can it be that the 'Universal'-Genius and  'Poet Dramatist'-Genius ( today is known and called as SHAKE(-)SPEARE ) never lived and existed? 

That it was no real person, but an artificial M A S K!
The Engraver clearly-marked  the Chin-Neck line
 to indicate  a M A S K 

A   M A S K behind which 'the only existing 'true' Poet Genius of his age 
Christopher  MARLOWE**   was hiding :



(602) There never existed a poet-genius called 'SHAKESPEARE'

 A brief highlight for the bored Stratfordians

Since I have long noticed that Shakespeare Admirers are not particularly interested in the real person of the poet and they consider the authorship problem as troublesome and as solved at the same time and do not estimate long discourses on the problem at all, I fabricated for a change a short highlight to alert and entertain most of the bored Stratfordians.

More than 80% of Stratfordians have no precise knowledge of Marlowe.


(601) Believe it or not !There never existed a poet-genius named SHAKE-SPEARE.


The name SHAKE-SPEARE  was a Penname for the 'true',  prolific 'absolute' polymath and  poet-genius called Christopher Marlowe, whose death was feigned with the help of the crown, he survived, but a long-life long  lived incognito and was forced to write  under a barely imaginable number of pseudonyms and initials (of invented  and/or really existing) persons (such as William S. from Stratford, a merchant, and shareholder)

One of these multiple Pennames:

Gervase Markham 

is dealt with in this video.


Believe it or not!

There is no other or better solution to the

Century old bizarre

Shakespeare Authorship Enigma.







Short Summary of a long Story!

taken from the German Monography
Der wahre Shakespeare: Christopher Marlowe

 also as e-book

(600) Why Shakespeare's alleged Play 'Pericles' was written by Marlowe?

   This Youtube  VIDEO tries to offer a solution about


▷ the only 'reasonable' and logical author of the Shakespeare play

    'Pericles Prince of Tyre - (CM)  

▷ the reason, why that play did not appear in the 'First Folio',1623

▷ the text parallels between the play 'Pericles', the Pericles Novella

    (1608) by G. Wilkins and 'The Painful Adventures' by  L. & T. 

    Twyne"(1594 /1607) (Pen-names of a unique, single author (CM)

▷ the autobiographical contextual background for Act I of 'the play ' 

     (Banishment and Exile)

▷  the Significance  of George Wilkins'  other Works (1606-1608)

(599 )Marlowe and the famous bard are one and the same person.


award winning journalist, author and lecturer Martin Sieff

introduces a series of often overlooked questions, paradoxes and facts that indicate a secret world of political intelligence that point towards the possibility that

Christopher Marlowe and the famous bard

are one and the same person.

(598) The true author of the play "King Lear" was Christopher Marlowe.....

......writing under one of his many pseudonyms:
   Such as Shake-speare

Observations and reflections of Shakespeare's famous Tragedy of "King Lear" make it seem plausible  and 


1)... that the 4 King LEIR / LEAR editions between 1594 and 1623 must have sprung from a single brain 
2)... that this brain cannot have been identical with that of William Shakspere from Stratford
3)... that it belonged to the poet and dramatist-genius Christopher Marlowe, who tried to link 
his complex, tragic life situation in 1605/06 with the ancient historic King Lear as  well as with his loss of identity (Edgar / Kent), his exile, the death of his parents, a general depressive melancholy and senselessness...

(597) The true Shakespeare as the Author of "Titus Andronicus".

The true Shakespeare  (and not the false! Shakspere ) as  the Author of "Titus Andronicus".

C O N C L U S I O N S :

There are numerous plausible and logical reasons to agree that Shakespeare ("William from Stratford) was not the author of Titus Andronicus:

1.)   A no longer comprehensible number of  renowned literary Experts (although largely 
forgotten and negated today) early doubted Shakespeare's authorship of  "Titus Andronicus" such 
Lewis Theobald, Samuel Johnson, George Steevens, Edmond Malone, William Guthrie, John Upton, 
Benjamin Heath, Richard Farmer, John Pinkerton, and John Monck Mason, William Hazlitt and 
Samuel Taylor Coleridge a.o. 

2.) Q1 printed 1594 entered the Stationer's register late 1593 only month after Marlowe's fatal twist of 

3.) Specific text analogies between Shakespeare’s "Titus Andronicus", "History plays" and  the "Sonnets" suggest a common poet and author: 

Demetrius, Tamara's son, speaks in “Titus” about 
Lavinia (II/1)
        "She is a woman, therefore to be woo’d" 
        "She is a woman, therefore to be won"; 
        "She is Lavinia, therefore to be lov'd",

This sounds strikingly similar in Shakespeare's 
Sonnet 41: 
        "Gentle thou art, and therefore to be won", 
        "Beauteous thou art, therefore to be assailed" 

«The same applies to» Henry VI/ I « (V / 3): 
        "She's beautiful,  and therefore to be woo'd" 
         "She is a woman,  therefore to be won"

4.)  The late insertion and content of scene III/2 in Titus Andronicus of the First Folio reveal unnoticed 
allegoric (autobiographic) parallels to the true authors senseless death..

 "a deed of death done on the innocent";

 as well as allegoric legacies, to posterity, to his 
daughter (Lavinia):
"...go with me Lavinia, I'll to thy closet; and go 
read with you sad stories chanced in the times of old"

and to his nephew (boy)
" Go with me:  thy sight is young and thou shalt 
read, when mine begins to dazzle
                                                                         [--->  ! End of the newly inserted scene! ]

5. In Marlowe's play "The Jew of Malta"  the villain "Barabas" definitely  influenced the Villain 
("Aaron" )  in "Titus Andronicus".

6. There are logical and plausible arguments that not only the authors of the history plays  "Edward 
II" [Marlowe[ and anonymous "Edward I" [Peele ??]) were identical, but also the authors of the anony-mous plays "Edward III" [Shakespeare?] and "Edward IV" [Heywood?] belonged to pennames of 

                                                      for some more details see these  videos!

(596)When will SOF begin with necessary steps?

Where does "Oxfordianism" actually get the hope from, of ever gaining general acceptance of its theory? (a century after Looney!)

 I suppose

A dead end story!?

    An infinite way to an unavailing success!?


SOF should define the Criteria
for final success!

Is the probability of success for Edward de Vere really 
so much better than for the only poetic and dramatic genius of its time,
the singular former Superstar of the London Theater, Christopher Marlowe?

There are thousands of PRO- Arguments
but only a singular essential CONTRA-Argument for Marlowe
( His death because of his early assassination)

Shouldn't a Global Collective and Academe begin to reverse and correct a singular false fatal Conclusion  in favour of  thousands of logical and plausible Pro-Arguments for Christopher Marlowe's Survival as the "true" Shakespeare?

An open , honest and fair S O F community would at least have to invalidate all logical and plausible arguments in favour of Marlowe, which, given the facts, can hardly succeed...

When will SOF begin with the necessary steps?

Collected Video-Contributions (arguments) to support
the Marlowe/Shakespeare authorship thesis (oct. 2020)

(595) A key question, the Oxfraud ADEPTS should answer!


What is the main interest (main goal? main question?) of the Oxfraud adepts?

... to prove that ...

1. The Oxford theory is absolute nonsense!

2. The Stratfordman theory is and will remain the gold standard!

3. The world still needs a more coherent theory!


(594) Nicholas Breton : a Pseudonym of the "true" Shakespeare. (Not to be confused with the Stratfordman)

In this video a series of contextual 

arguments have been compiled that make it 

compelling, logical and plausible that the 

author "Nicholas  Breton", contemporary to 

Shakespeare and unidentifiable in his 

lifetime (beyond his works), must have been 

a Penname or literary  Pseudonym of 

Marlowe. [aka Shake-speare]


It remains utterly  inexplicable why generations of literary scholars have not even attempted to enlighten and understand 

a) what autobiographical and deeper meaningful contents lay behind the complex texts, the poetry and philosophy of the prolific  genius Nicholas Breton, 

b) who this productive, witty contemporary of Shakespeare actually was  and 

c) why Breton does not  even belong to the devious list of todays discussed Shakspeare authorship candidates?

(593) A fundamental breakthrough and progress for the SHAKESPEARE authorship debate! -

A great event has happened.....a milestone

"As of August 1, 2020,

all texts produced under EEBO Phase I and Phase II

are freely available to the public."


(592) The Shakespeare authorship Issue: A new Marlowianism at the horizon?

 I became aware of "Langton lite", with 2 posts on the Authorship issue.- What a surprise,  new Marlowian efforts at the horizon ?

, …my key question to Dr.Christian Taylor. : what is his main reason to rehash (at this moment) a century old terribly stale taboo discussion on all the damn old topics (spelling, correspondence, biographical contents, the will, illiterate family etc. etc. etc.

 What does he  expect? Another hundred years of an obviously unfruitful unproductive "Oxfordianism" (they just now celebrate Looney’s centennial (!) anniversary)

Where is the solution supposed to come from, if not from a radical turnaround in traditional views?

            A complete new "Marlowianism"?

It seems not likely  that a more logic and more plausible „conspiracy authorship thesis“ (than the Multi-pseudonymity thesis of poet genius and former Superstar of the London Theater ) will arise.  It may even well be, that a global intelligence will never be able or ready to understand and resolve the complexity of the authorship problem, let alone  the singular virtually inconceivable mental capacity of the singular „true“ Shakespeare [Marlowe].


Multi-Pseudonymity thesis of Marlowe


Collected single Argument s