1 The anonymous Poem "A Funeral Elegy" (1612) is recognized in this VIDEO as an allegorical Parable of the "TRUE" Shakespeare (Christopher Marlowe.)
2. The specific solution of the SHAKESPEARE Authorship Problem: deadly threatened MARLOWE survived by faking his death with Royal Support (W: Cecil) and wrote (concealed and banished for life) under multiple Pseudonyms such as SHAKESPEARE, FORD and many more.
3. An additional contribution to the solution of the complex authorship Issue; It solves at the same time the bizarre and insane entire SHAKESPEARE CO-Authorship PHANTASM
These 2 figures represent the most (and only ) authentic contemporary depictions of
William Shakspere from Stratford
& William Shakespeare (First Folio1623)
_____________________ click VIDEO _______________________________
They are by no means identical personalities.
The living William Shaksperefrom Stratford (to be seen as a bust in the Trinity church of Stratford ) was taken as the 'corrupted Peudonym'SHAKESPEARE ( copper engraving) in the collected dramatic works (so-called FF, First Folio 1623) as a cover for the only existing greatest English Poet-Genius (Christopher Marlowe) whose death had to be feigned for life-saving reasons.
___________
Short Recap of the Marlowe Shakespeare authorship thesis
There was only one truly great poetic GENIUS in his time: Christopher MARLOWE (born in the same year 1564 as Shakspere/Stratford ) who in his 30th year of life (May 1593) was threatened by execution following slanderous accusation (of TREASON & Heresy) against him by the English Crown & Church. A feigned death staged in Deptford with the help of Marlowe's employer, the 'Senior Advisor' of Queen Elisabeth William Cecil (Lord Burghley) saved him by banishing him - for his own safety - but at the price of a permanent abandoning of identity & name, writing henceforth [ as already previously!] behind a CURTAIN of ALIAS & PSEUDONYMS such as
...
Richard B A R N F I E L D,
William B A S S E,
Francis B E A U M O N T
Nicholas B R E T O N,
George C H A P M A N,
(Double) John DAVIES,
Michael D R A Y T O N,
(Triple) J+Ph+G F L E T C H E R,
Thomas H E Y W O O D,
Henry P E A C H A M,
William S H A K E - S P E A R E,
George W I T H E R,
a. o.
as ABSURD
UNTHINKABLE and
LUDICROUS it may sound!
You may study singular detailed arguments for these names on this channel.(URL adress below the Video
As long as the 'borrowed Stratfordman's Name' SHAKSPEARE is not recognized as the corrupted embellished ' FRONT-name SHAKESPEARE of poet GENIUS MARLOWE, the author- ship puzzle will not be resolvable!
Dana F. Sutton, Prof.Emeritus, University of California, Irvine answered some emails I had sent to him, asking him for his opinion regarding the existence or non-existence of a Shakespeare authorship problem : He responded exclusively to my Gager article, unfortunately not to the more interesting basic idea of an authorship question
________________________________
He impressively referred to me as
The attention-craving exhibitionist....simply cavorting in public
Letter excerpt:. emphasis(bold) by me.
..." your effort concerning GAGER ... was silly, contemptible and altogethernotworthy of a response…..I couldn’t help asking myself how in the world anybody might gain the impression that BOTH Gager and Marlowe could be “Shakespeare,” for at least two reasons: a.) Gager did all his worthwhile work in Latin, never in English (his few poems written in English are of rather poor quality) and b.) his life is vastly better-documented than those of Shakespeare and Marlowe combined. It is almost asifyoujustpicked the name of Gagerout of a hat at random to have something to say.
, I cannot help asking myself how a man with a presumptive commitment to the scientific method within his own area of expertise can play so fast and free with the facts regarding the Shakespeare authorship question as if that is an area in which reasonable standards of proofdonotapply.
There are some very good scholars (e. g. Nina Green and my Berkeley colleague Alan Nelson) who are convinced that Bacon = Shakespeare. I disagree with them but I respect them because they play the game by its accepted rules. There’s a world of difference between Bundesliga football and Aldous Huxley’s “centrifugal bumblepuppy” (=from Huxley's Brave New World) because the one game has a well-developed rulebook accepted by all its players and the other doesn’t, and there’s a world of difference between scholarship and simply cavorting in public as an attention-craving exhibitionist.
____________________________
_
The Degree of Concordances between William GAGER & Christopher MARLOWE [ here seen as the only 'true' Shakespeare] seems too massive, to be purely coincidental:
Arguments in this VIDEO
1 Birthdate 2 Canterbury Kings school 3 Oxford Study 4 Study of Law (DCL) 5 Reputation as Dramatist 6 GAGER's contemporaneous Ranking 7 Unconditional Question 8 'D I D O' 9 'H E R O & LE A N D E R 10 GAGER / Chapman 11 MELEAGER (Boas) 12 MELEAGER (Dido&Tamburlaine) 13 MELEAGER (Essex) 14 LUCRECE (Shakespeare) 15 ULYSSES Mary Sidney 16 Handwriting 17 BRETON / Gager 18 Handwriting (+ Raynold) 19 Oedipus (Basse) 20 Oedipus (Wither) 21 Abrupt End of GAGER's Dramatist Career 22 University OXFORD's other POETs 23 POLIMANTEIA 24 Thomas BASTARD 25 Richard BARNFIELD 26 CHRESTOLEROS(1) 27 CHRESTOLEROS(2) 28 PEELE /GAGER 29 King EDWARD I play 30 etc. etc.
The 'O X F R A U D', a literary battaillon
fighting for the 'Stratford-'Thesis against the 'Oxford-Theory, fighting a
double loosing battle. Stratford-'Thesis = Wlliam Shaksper from Stratford
Oxford-Theory, = the 17th Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere wrote HAMLET, KING
LEAR , TIMON of Athens etc.
What a pity that Alexander is on the wrong track. -
______________
My conviction
It really didn‘t need such sophisticated decoding or ‘‘apophenic‘‘ deciphering
but instead a decade of reading, understanding and interpreting
the immense contemporary 'contextual' literature, to reach the irrefutable conclusion,
that the ‘true or real‘ SHAKE-SPEARE can only have been SOMEONE with a pre-viously unpresented number of Pseudonyms, changed again & again. .. such as SHAKESPEARE, DRAYTON, CHAPMAN; BARNFIELD; BASSE; BRETON, HEYWOOD, TAYLOR, WITHER etc etc.
Recently I watched a ZOOM Webinar with Alexander Waugh which premiered on Dec.20020
I recorded and copied 2 Interesting stunning minutes starting at 01:55.42
Marlowe exists, ... as a separate entity
TRANSCRIPT: Life Event 12 Dec 2020 WEBINAR
Read what Alexander Waugh expressed:
JUST AN IDEA (?) .
A GUESS (?)
_______________________________
" I would just say: it's a
sidely (?), weird and fantastical theory, but I don‘t wonder if Marlowe
exists, as a separate entity, a separate
name, from the great Shakespeare… school,
and there are all these experts and are telling us that his hand is all over some of the
Shakespeare plays ..Henry VI particularly
…tell us that he exists, a separate entity, possibly because Edward de Vere could not stand the sight of him after he realized his atheism and that therefore his contribution the
Shakespeare Canon which may have
included EDWARD II and things like that,
they were sort of let loose and they got a life of their own and hence Marlowe has this great name for him
self .- Just an Idea,…it’s a guess."
THOMAS & GEORGE N O R T H, A famous double of plagiarist in the late 1570ies of Shakespeare's plays ??
_____________________________________
.Proposed solution of the North / Shakespeare riddle
A thousand identical text parallels between NORTH and SHAKESPEARE (like fingerprints) cannot have emerged from 2 different, but only from 1 singular subject (and brain!)
____________
This 'singular' brain belonged to the only existing 'true' concealed
that J.F. (John Fletcher) belongs to the Pseudo-Initials of MARLOWE,! only under this condition it becomes understandable and logical, that he did not collaborate, but - alone - was the true poet-genius writing under his Frontmans name SHAKSPEARE
the' King HENRY VIII play'.
It is more plausible that a single dramatist genius was the author of the King HENRY VIII play!
.a hidden author revealing himself in the play as Ambassador Capucius...
MARLOWE was writing under PSEUDO-NAMEs (or PSEUDO-INITIALS J.F.
a) "....Hermeticisms survived as the philosophical and theological Epicenter
of Freemasonry.- ..." in England
b) "....that one of the Key messages of Hermes (Trismegistos) is that he writes: "The greatest evil
in mankind is ignorance...seek then a guide to take you by the hand and
lead you to the portals of knowledge that(?) te the light cleansed of all darkness..."
c) " who better to that than William Shakespeare who stands in LeicesterSquare carved
in marble pointing to his own words : ä0pTHERE IS NO DARKNESS BUT IGNORANCE"
Shakespeare carved in Marble at Leicester Square (London)
d) Waugh: " Shakespeare thus very close to the Hermetic philosophers and to Hermes..(Trismegistos)
e) NOTE: it is more appropriate to associate this Marble" phrase to Marlowe's
famous sentence in
"The Jew of Malta" : I count religion but a childish toy, and hold there is no sin but ignorance.
or Doktor Faustus and the Ignorance in knowledge
one can take this as another logical and plausible evidence that Marlowe
The name Shake-speare is dealt with a list of the top 10 most significant Pseudonyms of a singular Poet and dramatist Genius
Christopher Marlowe.
-------------
That Marlowe (aka Shake-speare) survived can only become conceivable when his incredibly great spirit was incredibly productive, writing under many pseudonyms, over a long period of life!
Literally, with all Marlowian I miss some fundamental reflections and research.
A Marlowian Theory cannot exist, i.e. doesn’t make any sense, as long as one does not assume that Marlowe survived.
If Marlowe (alias Shakespeare) survived, however, he must have had a specific biography for his surviving time. (up to 1655?) And these life data & experiences must have been reflected in some (many?) ways in texts of himself as of concealed pseudonymous poets, and by no means only in play texts of Shakespeare.
Can anybody even remotely accept that there is no need for any contextual autobiographical (poetical) evidence and (re)search?
These contextual massive autobiographical evidence in fact are and must be the cornerstones of the evidence, of circumstantial evidence and reasoning.
And Marlowian Daryl Pinksen (mirabile dictu!) doesn’t either have heard or ever listened to any line of all Youtube presentations or ever asked the crucial question what Marlowe might have done & written in all his surviving time? What a depressing confession of failure!
As a longtime Marlowian, I recently discovered a more detailed article of the hungarianpublisher and editor Pal Faklen (Budapest) on the Marlowe Shakespeare authorship issue(entitled "The Delayed Resurrection of Marlowe) which I naturally liked very much.
I very much hope that Pal Faklens essential and amazing arguments will receive (slowly, but at least) a gradual recognitionworld wide.
Lately, I became aware of the wonderful Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of the OXFRAUDS. Their belief or expectation about the
Shakespeare Authorship is, that the game is over.
At no time the OXFRAUDS had any real interest in
finding out what about the centuries-old doubt is justified and what is not.
The Marlowe Theory, despite Peter Farey, had no chance with them. They
haven't even started, to reflect the Marlowe issue.
At no time the Oxfraud community had any real interest
in finding out what about the centuries-old doubt is justified and what is not.
And how to explain the unimaginable amount of inconsistencies. The Marlowe
Theory, despite Peter Farey, did not have the slightest chance in their group.
Wherever they could they made a fool of him and Marlowians like me , and even declared me as deceased(!). : a rather pitiable, ridiculous
bunch when compared to the great minds of the Non-Stratfordians.
