For centuries, the question of Shakespeare's authorship has puzzled readers, scholars, and researchers. This blog presents a comprehensive solution: The Multi-Pseudonymity Theory (MPT). According to my research, Christopher Marlowe — officially declared dead in 1593 — survived and continued to write under multiple pseudonyms.
About Me
March 09, 2025
(701) Shakespeare's sonnets , 2nd edition reveal the true Author !
August 16, 2020
(589) The intangibility of the Marlowe / Shakespeare authorship thesis.-
When will Marlowe ever get
his Chance?
The (MSA) Marlowe Society of America held its 8th International Conference from 10–13 July, 2018 in Wittenberg, Germany, an important historic center of both religion and culture in sixteenth-century Germany….its university (now known as the "Leucorea") was made the alma mater of Shakespeare's Hamlet ("Let not thy mother lose her prayers, Hamlet: / I pray thee, stay with us; go not to Wittenberg."). The town also served as backdrop for the B-Text Doctor Faustus, the locale where Faustus first "surfeits upon cursed necromancy" and where his life ends "All torn asunder by the hand of death!"
Could MSA organize a conference with 70 lecturers without sponsorship? No....it is obvious that sponsorship depended on the INTANGIBILITY Of THE STRATFORD DOGMA . Crossing this sacred frontier, (by dealing with the Marlowe / Shakespeare authorship) the conference and MSA would have had no chance to get institutional financial support.
The International Marlowe Conference featured keynote presentations by all the ultra-dogmatic Stratfordian scholars such as Lukas Erne (University of Geneva), Kristen Poole (University of Delaware), Holger Syme (University of Toronto) , and Meghan C. Andrews [ unfortunately recently deceased!] and many more.
Be aware, Marlowe ( if he is not Shakespeare) is licensed for research (only) but not for the prohibited zone of plausible theories , the entrance is advisable only for those who are really independent and free, who have nothing to lose , who are no longer hurt when the official exorcist supervisors of literature signify that "doubting is mental illness " (J. D. Dixon) and these who disobey the blind „Stratfordian or Oxfordian“ faith " are just crazy" (Stanley Wells). And they call themselves scholars?!
Look at the long Marlowe resources bibliography on the MSA home page. And look at the much longer Shakespeare bibliographies anywhere in the world. An army of researchers will have to face that their work (sometimes life work) is a pile of scientific garbage. As long as this consacrated legend reigns, it's a better choice for them to accept benefits, job, professional advancement, prestige, reputation instead of risking „Career Suicide“.- Their price is to accept also the rules of silence (omerta), and put the common sense in the wardrobe — or even better in the safe.
——————————
In Wittenberg Megan C.Andrews (unfortunately deceased in June 2023)
gave a speech on Michael Drayton ,
earlier she had published an interesting article entitled
For reasons mentioned above (“Career suicide“), in her article (and at the conference) she didn‘t even dare to discuss a plausible possible Marlowe / Shakspere connection, which assumes, that (surviving) Marlowe wrote under a multiplicity of pennames including Michael Drayton ...
What a shame. -
YOUNG PEOPLE SHOULD BE MORE CRITICAL
AND NOT SO FAITHFUL
Click video on DRAYTON
August 05, 2020
(588) Shakespeare‘s identity : Encrypted beyond any recognition
![]() |
| Alexander Waugh |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oi7nFkhbDjM&t=1s
July 29, 2020
(587) Oxfordian Theory in Crisis: Why Richard Waugaman Avoids Marlowe Altogether”
July 26, 2020
(586) The Oxfrauds and their inner dichotomy towards the Marlowe candidacy
With an inner joy they express that they „survived that onslaught, and every other one since including "The Stritmatterian Big Fist", the Declaration of Reasonable Unreason, the Wavian Teflon Fortress“ and here they „are still doing business.“
We learn ...
B) that „there are better candidates ...and alternative candidates.... Most of them better than the Earl of Oxford. „. A heavily commented part of the site.
Christopher Marlowe
Strangely enough you find a chapter about Christopher Marlowe's candidacy …claiming that it „has a great deal going for it“.... You learn from Oxfrauds website:
...the rules of Common Sense:
Formulated and written by Oxfraud !
gifted writer,
a pioneering playwright,
a superb poet and
a consummate craftsman.
Stylometry even places his vocabulary nearest to the vocabulary used in the canon (Oxford's is out by from here to Venus).
almost identical to the gaps in Shakespeare's knowledge.
need not be improvised from fable as the evidence is all solid.
no need for feeble pseudonymy or
the invention of claptrap like 'the stigma of print'.
does not require the incredible invention of a second Shakespeare
to explain away topical references.
——————————
July 14, 2020
(585) DOUBLE DUMMY : Oxfraud / Shakefraud! The Questionability of the Shakespeare Authorship issue.
who during his entire lifetime (... especially in his 25 years in London) never communicated (by any note, sentence or letter) with any publicly known person....
accused of High-Treason & Heresy)
July 10, 2020
(582) The Shakespeare Authorship Debate Ends Here — Marlowe’s Smoking Gun
There is only one but crucial reason why Christopher Marlowe {C.M.}, as by far the most plausible and logic candidate, has constantly been rejected or dismissed by leading „Stratfordian“ academics (as well as by those impressive relentless ridiculous „Oxfraud“ combat troop) in the search for the true poet genius „Shakespeare.
It must be due to the supposed certainty that the poet genius { C.M.} died too early that he can by no means play a part in the authorship debate.
Why several historical sources found (which show that Marlowe survived) have not had any significant status to date ?
The influential Marlowian Peter Farey has discussed the subject but came to the opposite conclusion that a certain „John„ Mathew used the alias name of Christopher Marlowe.
For an abundance of reasons, ( click links). there can be little doubt, that Christopher Marlowe used the name „Mathew“ as an alias Name , he used , however „Tobias“ ,or „Tobie“ (Mathew) as the prename.
The fact, that Francis Bacon (living at the same time as Marlowe /Shakespeare in the same City in London) in his entire life never ever used or wrote the name „Shakespeare needs a plausible explanation: Bacons impressive contents of his documented correspondence with „his alter ego“ Tobie Mathew clearly prove, that Tobie Matthew was an alias for concealed Marlowe/Shakespeare.
December 17, 2019
(557) The wretched lack of Media imagination: "Shake-speare" is a pseudonym of a poet (with multiple pseudonyms)!
October 12, 2016
(468) Breton certainly another early penname (pseudonym) of Marlowe such as Shake-speare.
NICHOLAS B R E T O N
"Rules of Conduct" perfectly fit to Marlowe's fatal and endangered concealed life situation.-
(Bretons s.Vol.1 and Vol.2 of his workes)
VIDEO Nicholas Breton (ca 55 min)
VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:OPEN —> Heading--> Home -->Videos -- Shorts -- Posts ->Popular
October 07, 2015
(291) Who was William Vaughan (part5)? Why in 1608 he added a chapter (I/3-24):"An answer to the objection of Lucrecia!"
WILLIAM W A U G H A N (5)
William Vaughan [alias Marlowe/Shakespeare]
metaphorically explains...
...the philosophy, motiv and logic of the suicide in Shakespeares
play "Lucrece"....and the necessity to murder Tarquin [Marlowe]
_____________________
of the suicide of Lucrece.-

"Lucrece" (1594 op.2) is the second work (following "Venus & Adonis"-1593 op.1) published under the name of Shakespeare.
Vaughans "interpretation" expressed by the wisdome of Augustine is that the integrity of the Queen (Lucrece) could not be regained unless Marlowe was banished,

The argumentation of Vaughan reminds one to "The Ghost of Lucrece (1600) an early appendix to the third edition of Shakespeare's Lucrece by T.M.
It is difficult to conceive, that the powerfull self-confident 'True' Shakespeare in his 35th year of life should have allowed it, that his epic poem "Lucrece" was amended by 47 poems and commented in the same book, in the same style, by an unidentifiable "Ghostwriter" T.M., thought to be Thomas Middleton, 19 years of age?
Aren't there more plausible explanations for these conspicuous features?








