Showing posts with label Interpretation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Interpretation. Show all posts

March 09, 2025

(701) Shakespeare's sonnets , 2nd edition reveal the true Author !

Shakespeare's S O N N E T s ,
2nd Edition (1640)
reveal the true Author !


Before you listen to the Dialog VIDEO
(Created by notebookLM)
Study the Original Video! 
—————————-

Ai Dialog Video about the original Video (below)


——————

Original Video
 

 --------------------------------------------------


VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:
OPEN  —>   Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts
                                                                   ->Popular



August 16, 2020

(589) The intangibility of the Marlowe / Shakespeare authorship thesis.-

When will Marlowe ever get

 his Chance?

Wittenberg

The (MSA) Marlowe Society of America held its 8th International Conference from 10–13 July, 2018 in Wittenberg, Germany,  an important historic center of both religion and culture in sixteenth-century Germany….its university (now known as the "Leucorea") was made the alma mater of Shakespeare's Hamlet ("Let not thy mother lose her prayers, Hamlet: / I pray thee, stay with us; go not to Wittenberg."). The town also served as backdrop for the B-Text Doctor Faustus, the locale where Faustus first "surfeits upon cursed necromancy" and where his life ends "All torn asunder by the hand of death!"

Could MSA organize a conference with 70 lecturers without sponsorship? No....it is obvious that sponsorship depended on the INTANGIBILITY Of THE STRATFORD DOGMA . Crossing this sacred frontier, (by dealing with the Marlowe / Shakespeare authorship)  the conference and MSA would have had no chance to get institutional financial support.

The International Marlowe Conference featured keynote presentations by all the ultra-dogmatic  Stratfordian scholars such as Lukas Erne (University of Geneva), Kristen Poole (University of Delaware), Holger Syme (University of Toronto) ,  and Meghan C. Andrews [ unfortunately recently deceased!] and many more.

Be aware, Marlowe ( if he is not Shakespeare) is licensed for research (only)  but not for  the prohibited zone of plausible theories ,  the entrance  is advisable only for those who are really independent and free, who have nothing to lose , who are no longer hurt when the official exorcist supervisors of literature signify that "doubting is mental illness " (J. D. Dixon) and these who disobey the blind „Stratfordian or Oxfordian“ faith " are just crazy" (Stanley Wells). And they call themselves scholars?!

Look at the long Marlowe resources bibliography on the MSA home page. And look at the much longer  Shakespeare bibliographies anywhere in the world.  An army of researchers will have to face that their work (sometimes life work) is a pile of scientific garbage. As long as this consacrated legend reigns, it's a better choice for them to accept benefits, job, professional advancement, prestige, reputation instead of riskingCareer Suicide“.- Their price is to accept also the rules of silence (omerta), and put the common sense in the wardrobe — or even better in the safe.

——————————

                     In Wittenberg Megan C.Andrews (unfortunately deceased in June 2023)

                                             gave a speech on Michael Drayton ,

                                                earlier she had published an interesting  article entitled

For  reasons mentioned above (“Career suicide“), in her article (and at the conference) she didn‘t even dare to discuss a plausible possible  Marlowe / Shakspere connection, which assumes, that (surviving) Marlowe wrote under a multiplicity of pennames including Michael Drayton ...

                                                                   What a shame. -  

YOUNG PEOPLE SHOULD BE MORE CRITICAL 

AND NOT SO FAITHFUL

                                                 Click  video on  DRAYTON



————————-


VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:
OPEN  —>   Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts
                                                                   ->Popular

August 05, 2020

(588) Shakespeare‘s identity : Encrypted beyond any recognition

ALEXANDER. W A U G H (8)
   Encrypted 
beyond any Recognition?

Alexander Waugh 


                         
I am  always fascinated by the imaginative power of the human brain in general and  of Alexander Waugh in particular, what a fantastic obsession in a neve-never land, encrypted beyond recognition, decrypted after 400 years, by an 'unleashed' brain.

Alexander Waugh‘s Video
On Thomas Edwards
 Video 
Alexander Waugh‘s message (3.8.2020):  Thomas Edwards in 1595 knew that Shakespeare was the pseudonym of Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford! ....
Can that be true at all?


This time Alexander Waugh in his Video series used Thomas Edwards (TE) a contemporary of William Shakspere „trying to prove that his (TE) witness knew, that Shakespeare was a pseudonym being used by the poeticall 17th Earl of Oxford (Edward de Vere)".  

As the decisive piece of evidence    
selected TE's" Narcissus".

It remains difficult to understand why Waugh didn‘t give the  full (significant!) title and picture! of TE’s book „Cephalus and Procris“ (1595) and  why in 1595 in the dedication entitled „To the Honorable Gentlemen & true favorites of  Poetrie" the author openly confesses :
                       " O what is honor without the complement of Fame?"
                          "...my soul darkened with the terror of oblivion"

Who other than Marlowe in 1595 could have had a motif to explicitly write and reflect such  perspective of life.- . I see no motif for Edward de Vere.

How can we  understand, that  a completely unknown Thomas Edwards was the first author to mention Shakespeare’s op.1  "Venus and Adonis (1593)  in his "Cephalus and Procris" which entered  the Stationers' Register , October  22 1593 -  

How can it be that at that early time (1595), TE  in Narcissus is already quoting Marlowes "Hero & Leander ",!??    How  could  he have known from this poem that early, which appeared in print only years later  (1598)?

 Isn't the authorship thesis ... 

A.)  that the only existing poet and playwright genius of his time,
surviving  Christopher Marlowe  was the author of  "Venus & Adonis" (1593 Shakespeare's op.1)  and "Lucrece" (1594 Shakespeare's op.2)  far more logic and plausible  ...than

B )  that Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, with no documented capabilities of a playwright genius whatsoever, was the "true" Shakespeare?

 s.Videos.-
                                                                Venus and Adonis

                                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oi7nFkhbDjM&t=1s



                                                                  Hero & Leander


                                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZygXSElqlg&t=1s 

July 29, 2020

(587) Oxfordian Theory in Crisis: Why Richard Waugaman Avoids Marlowe Altogether”

TRUE SHAKESPEARE‘s
(=Marlowe's ) Inconceivable Multiplicity 
of Pen Names


                                                                    
 Richard Waugaman's Speech
                                          Internal and External Meanings of Pen Names
                                                    Did Shakspere write Shakespeare?

----------------------------


What a shame that not even once ( ....an unforgivable failure!) Richard Waugaman mentioned in "his Reflections on Pen names and Shakespeare

Shakespeare Marlowe

.—. see the video: English Summary (50 min) of the German Book: (700pages) „The only true Shakespeare: Christopher Marlowe“.-
https://youtu.be/Z7VeQ7OER14
Several highly plausible and logic proposals (Pen Names) are given in various videos that 
Marlowe (alias Shake-speare) used a stunning 
multiplicity of Pennames (pseudonyms) such
(as absurd as it may sound!!) Richard Barnfield. https://youtu.be/s5Xq2OWplWo
William Basse. https://youtu.be/D5cS22VAqm0

Thomas Beard.                              https://youtu.be/92kVZxCFIKk
                            Nicholas Breton. . ..............
William Cle(a)rke https://youtu.be/tYPKa3xyHYo
John Davies. https://youtu.be/M9lar8Ymuwg?t=1
Thomas Drayton. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57LKIFQTkFo&t=1s
George Chapman. . https://youtu.be/GZygXSElqlg?t=1.
Bartholomew Griffin https://youtu.be/zxnPqLuhFn4

John Ford. https://youtu.be/zYRdNU6GJc4
Henry Petowe. ..... . https://youtu.be/GZygXSElqlg?t=1
William Shakespeare https://youtu.be/Z7VeQ7OER14
James Shirley. ..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXy8C9kvj7A&t=1s
Joshua Sylvester. ..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qwFr6lEPZc
Henry Willobie (Willoghby). https://youtu.be/zxnPqLuhFn4
George Wither. https://youtu.be/euL6_WHv9OI And more!
——————————————————
VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive: (MARLOWE/Shakespeare)
Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts
                                                       ->Popular

July 26, 2020

(586) The Oxfrauds and their inner dichotomy towards the Marlowe candidacy

Marlowe‘s case could be a very strong one!

Oxfraudians unfortunately handed over their common sense to the cloakroom of the authorship theater...
The Oxfraud community (with about 250 members) stated on their Website that they launched the site, five years ago to a chorus of jeers from Oxfordians everywhere, many of whom wrote to them explaining their insignificance and pointing out that they would be swamped by the onslaught of the new ‘post-stratfordian' paradigm

With an inner joy they express that they „survived that onslaught, and every other one since including "The Stritmatterian Big Fist", the Declaration of Reasonable Unreason, the Wavian Teflon Fortress“ and here they „are still doing business.“

... and „the business end of this argument would [now] be over and Oxfordians rarely would now emerge in public.“
___________________
We learn ...

A) about 102 reasons to dismiss Oxford's candidacy. We learn that since the group first launched the site, the big (authorship) questions have been getting smaller. They ask themselves („strangely!“) „why there is anyone left at all believing in alternative authorship, is the biggest question today .“..but stunningly they also state ....

B) that „there are better candidates ...and alternative candidates.... Most of them better than the Earl of Oxford. „. A heavily commented part of the site.


Christopher Marlowe

Strangely enough you find a chapter about Christopher Marlowe's candidacy …claiming that it has a great deal going for it“.... You learn from Oxfrauds website:

There would be {only} one major hurdle to overcome. If De Vere was dead before a third of the {Shakespeare} plays were written, Marlowe was dead before almost any {? None!} of them were written. Marlowe died in a pub { ?...it was „a house“, owned by Eleanor Bull .....) in Deptford on 30 May 1593 There was a body, there were witnesses, there was an inquest, there were 16 jurors, there was a verdict and there was a funeral.{ really? everything discovered not even 100 years ago}„

„However, the historical sleight of hand required to turn the man from Canterbury into the man from Stratford {would be} only a fraction of what is needed to turn the 17th Earl into Shakespeare. And Marlovians are up to the task. They have an explanation for the witnesses, an alternative body and a host of reasons why Marlowe would want to play dead and could have pulled off a fake killing successfully. 

We read..“..If Marlowe didn't die in 1593 and became Shakespeare then there is no need for the preposterous Oxfordian redating scheme. The plays, say Marlovians, were written and performed in an order which follows the rules of history, scholarship and common sense....“

...the rules of Common Sense:   

Formulated and written by Oxfraud !


Unlike Oxford, Marlowe was a 
gifted writer,
a pioneering playwright,
a superb poet and 
a consummate craftsman.
Stylometry even places his vocabulary nearest to the vocabulary used in the canon (Oxford's is out by from here to Venus).

Unlike Oxford, Marlowe was a commoner, a rare visitor to court with no rights or personal experience of courtoisie and matters of detailed hierarchy. His English history plays show shortcomings in knowledge of the court that are 

almost identical to the gaps in Shakespeare's knowledge.

Unlike Oxford, Marlowe was a graduate—an intellectual even. The so-called 'missing academic hinterland' 
need not be improvised from fable as the evidence is all solid.

Unlike Oxford, there are plausible reasons for the switch with 

no need for feeble pseudonymy or 
the invention of claptrap like 'the stigma of print'.

Unlike Oxford, the use of a pseudonym in the publication of 
Click Video —>Venus and Adonis 
supports the argument instead of blasting it to smithereens.

Unlike Oxford, the cover up as Marlowe assumed his new identity in a milieu which already knew him as Marlowe
does not require the incredible invention of a second Shakespeare 
to explain away topical references. 

——————————
Original Oxfraud text:

"If only Will had made zero impact before the publication of —>Venus and Adonis (a fantastic nonsense!) Marlowe's could be a very strong case.!!!!!!!!"


July 14, 2020

(585) DOUBLE DUMMY : Oxfraud / Shakefraud! The Questionability of the Shakespeare Authorship issue.

From the worlds most gigantic „writer“ 
   naming  himself „SHAKE-SPEARE“
never a single („hand“) written [letter]  has ever been discovered.That‘s...

the most Incredible Grotesque:

The world's greatest literary and playwright genius of all time,
 who during his entire lifetime (... especially in his 25 years in London)  never communicated (by any note, sentence or letter) with any publicly known person....

Stunningly, that does not need an explanation for the impressive & bizarre „Battle Troop“ (...fighting for „William“ from Stratford) ...called the

OXFRAUD
With their admirable perseverance for the absolute 

„Unimaginable“ of a (double) Shakespeare
Authorship falsehood !
———
Believe it or not! There did exist a „William Shakspeare  from Stratford. 
But he was no poet and playwright  genius!

He was taken as a protective „Dummy“, a pseudonym ! (for deadly threatened Christopher Marlowe
accused  of  High-Treason & Heresy)

That‘s the even more remarkable
SHAKEFRAUD“!




The Authorship  Circus




July 10, 2020

(582) The Shakespeare Authorship Debate Ends Here — Marlowe’s Smoking Gun

The deliberately overlooked „Smoking guns“
for Marlowe, the most plausible candidate of the Shakespeare authorship debate.

There is only one  but crucial reason why Christopher Marlowe {C.M.}, as by far the most plausible and logic candidate, has constantly been rejected or dismissed by leading „Stratfordian“ academics (as well as by those impressive relentless ridiculous „Oxfraud“ combat troop) in the search for the true poet genius „Shakespeare.

It must be due  to the supposed certainty that the poet genius { C.M.} died too early that he can by no means  play a part in the authorship debate. 

———  B U T ————

 ... astonishingly and strangely enough, 
Why several historical sources found (which show that Marlowe survived) have not had any significant status to date ?

1599 [May 30]
6 years after Marlowe‘s alleged death a man is documented who presented himself for admissions to St.Albans, The English Colledge at Valladolid in Spain.  -  The College Register (Liber Alumnorum) shows the entry:
 Jo. {hann}Matheus {John Mathew}
   Right Margins.  al {ias} Christopher Marlerus {Christopher Marlowe}

1602 [July 4]
A letter by William Vaughan from Pisa (Italy) to the English Royal court was discovered by Leslie Hotson, wherein you read...
 „,,,in the said seminary there is....one Christopher Marlor (as he will be called) but yet for certainty his name is Christopher, sometimes Master of Arts of Trinity Colledge in Cambridge, of very low stature,well set of black round beard, nor yet priest, but to come over in the mission of the next year ensuing....

1604 [Aug.3 - Sept.23]
Gatehouse (Prison)London Westminster

Committed by my Lo: Chief Justice      Christopher Marlowe, alias Matheus, a seminary priest oweth  for 7 weeks and 2 days


_____________________________________________


The influential Marlowian Peter Farey has discussed the subject but came to the opposite  conclusion that a certain „John„ Mathew used the alias name of Christopher Marlowe.

Farey‘s logic is, however not convincing... given all arguments and facts

http://marlowe-shakespeare.blogspot.com/2010/07/john-matthew-alias-christopher-marlowe.html

_________________________________

For an abundance of  reasons, ( click links). there can be little doubt, that Christopher Marlowe used the name „Mathew“ as an alias Name , he used , however  „Tobias“ ,or „Tobie“ (Mathew) as the prename.




The fact, that Francis Bacon (living at the same time as Marlowe /Shakespeare in the same City in London) in his entire life never ever used or wrote the name „Shakespeare needs a plausible explanation: Bacons  impressive contents of his  documented correspondence with „his alter ego“ Tobie Mathew clearly prove, that Tobie Matthew was an alias for concealed Marlowe/Shakespeare.  


For details click this VIDEO!    Below.  


December 17, 2019

(557) The wretched lack of Media imagination: "Shake-speare" is a pseudonym of a poet (with multiple pseudonyms)!

There was only one  "true  Poet-Genius and literary Giant"  of the London Theater : 

Christopher Marlowe

with 5 of his most significant Pseudonyms

click  (5) VIDEO-Examples ( --->)
 --->2  Michael Drayton, 
      --->3  Nicholas Breton, 
          --->4  George Wither,
               --->5  John Taylor.







VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:
Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts
                                                       ->Popular
———————-===

October 12, 2016

(468) Breton certainly another early penname (pseudonym) of Marlowe such as Shake-speare.

NICHOLAS  B R E T O N 

 "Rules of Conduct" perfectly  fit to Marlowe's fatal and endangered concealed life situation.-

_________
First Poem title   in Nicholas Bretons
 "Melancholike Humours"

Nicholas Breton an early penname of Marlowe (such as  Shakespeare !)

In 1600 Nicholas Breton published a small booklet "Melancholike Humours(1600)" with a Collection of verses with 30 poems of different styles .  -  Poem Nr. 1 [entitled "See and say nothing"] contains 9 verses of 4 lines [s.Faksimile 1-9 above].

Immediately you will notice that all 9 poems represent an

inner request to the author to be cautious and not to reveal himself:

1.    fortune affordes to do nothing, to keep quiet...
2. beware of the fate of Icarus ...
3. be silent, patient, deface yourself...
4. do not exhibit (show) yourself...
5. trust nobody...
6. keepe your secresies unseen...
7. be alert and do not languish overlong...
8. conceal and do not reveal your passion...
9. be secret with your thoughts...
__________

These "rules of Conduct" 
precisely fit to the life situation of the "true" Shakespeare: Christopher Marlowe.-

Subchapter (page 548-564 of Chapter 11 - German!) elaborates indications why Nicholas Breton (sometimes "Briton") has been a pseudonym of surviving Marlowe [ alias Shakespeare ]. -

 (Bretons   s.Vol.1 and Vol.2 of his workes)

Nicholas Breton an early penname of the "true"    Shakespeare !



VIDEO   Nicholas Breton  (ca 55 min)      



VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:
OPEN  —>   Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts
                                                                   ->Popular









October 07, 2015

(291) Who was William Vaughan (part5)? Why in 1608 he added a chapter (I/3-24):"An answer to the objection of Lucrecia!"

WILLIAM  W A U G H A N (5)

————-

William Vaughan [alias Marlowe/Shakespeare] 

metaphorically explains... 

...the philosophy, motiv  and logic of the suicide in Shakespeares 

play "Lucrece"....and the necessity to murder Tarquin [Marlowe]

_____________________

                                              



It is supicious that in the second enlarged version of "The Golden-grove"(1608)" by William Vaughan 14 new treatises (chapters 16-29) were added in the 3rd part of Book-I, concerned with self-death and fictive answers to the objection of several  ancient personalities


In Chap.24 (s.Faksimile) the author deals with  the

philosophy and  logic 
of the suicide of Lucrece.-

 "Lucrece" (1594 op.2) is the second work (following "Venus & Adonis"-1593 op.1) published under the name of Shakespeare. 

"Venus and Adonis" can be assumed to have been written some time before Marlowe's pretended death as a private work but published urgently on the grounds of serious events only weeks after Marlowe's disappearance , to introduce Shakespeare (and his op.1) as a new playwright.-

"Lucrece" should be seen as the actual op.1 after Marlowe's life catastrophy. -

 It represents the poetic metaphor of his serious offence against Queen Elizabeth.--      ("Tarquin"[Marlowe] had "tarred the queen" )
 

Vaughans "interpretation" expressed by the wisdome of Augustine is that the integrity of the Queen (Lucrece) could not be regained unless Marlowe was banished,



  ..."the chastitiy of Lucrece  cannot be praysed, unlesse her murther be condemned" If she were an adulteresse, why she is praysed? If she were chaste, why did she kill herselfe?






The argumentation of Vaughan reminds one to "The Ghost of Lucrece (1600) an early appendix to the third edition of Shakespeare's Lucrece by T.M.

It is difficult to conceive, that the powerfull self-confident 'True' Shakespeare in his 35th year of life should have allowed it, that his epic poem "Lucrece"  was amended by 47 poems and commented in the same book, in the same style, by an unidentifiable  "Ghostwriter" T.M., thought to be Thomas Middleton, 19 years of age?

Aren't there more plausible explanations for these conspicuous features?



William Vaughan (similar to Shake-speare) belonged 
to the multiplicity  of  pseudonyms of the poet-genius Marlowe!

( As implausible and absurd as it may sound without background knowledge of other contemporous book genres.!)