3 Jul 2015

(195) Tassinari's identification of Florio / Shakespeare is closer to the truth then you may think.

Stephen Greenblatts "fatal" construction of John Florio.- 




Stephen Greenblatt 
In the Daily Telegraph (June7, 2014) Stephen Greenblatt in his article "Shakespeare's Dept  to Montaigne" underlined the importance of John Florio (who translated Montaigne) for Shakespeare (s.Video below!), published with ->Peter G. Platt in his book "Shakespeare's Montaigne."

One feels compelled to ask 

Why Shakespeare 1603 needed a translation or a translator Florio, since he could read fluently the originals in French, Italian, Spanish, Latin, Greek? 

Shakespeare could write entire scenes (Henry V) in excellent  French! What would have hindered him from reading Montaigne in the original language? 


Greenblatt wrote in the "Daily Telegraph"::
...the allusions in The Tempest and elsewhere makes clear that Shakespeare read Montaigne not in French but in an English translation. That translation, published in a handsome folio edition in London in 1603, was by John Florio.....
...To read the Essays in
Florio’s translation is to read them, as it were, over the shoulders of some of England’s greatest writers.

....The translation seemed to address English readers of Shakespeare’s time with unusual directness and intensity.
  ....Specifically, Shakespeare takes Montaigne’s words, in Florio’s translation, and fashions them into the forged letter that Edmund fobs off as his brother Edgar’s.
....Shakespeare, who had an indifferent or ambivalent relationship to print, seems to have cultivated a certain anonymity.


John Florio
The end of the lie

The man who was
 SHAKESPEARE
Is it really conceivable  that  there was the " remarkable experience of not just two but three great writers (Florio Shakespeare Montaigne)  who ushered in the modern world" (->The New York Review of Books)

Isn't ->Lamberto Tassinari with his ->strong arguments, (favoring a common identity of Florio and Shakespeare) a decisive step closer to the truth (s.Blog 193) even if he may have not understood the final connections ?

                                                Stephen Greenblatts "performed" lecture..