The deliberately overlooked „Smoking guns“
for Marlowe, the most plausible candidate of the Shakespeare authorship debate.
There is only one but crucial reason why Christopher Marlowe {C.M.}, as by far the most plausible and logic candidate, has constantly been rejected or dismissed by leading „Stratfordian“ academics (as well as by those impressive relentless ridiculous „Oxfraud“ combat troop) in the search for the true poet genius „Shakespeare.
It must be due to the supposed certainty that the poet genius { C.M.} died too early that he can by no means play a part in the authorship debate.
——— B U T ————
... astonishingly and strangely enough,
Why several historical sources found (which show that Marlowe survived) have not had any significant status to date ?
Why several historical sources found (which show that Marlowe survived) have not had any significant status to date ?
1599 [May 30]
6 years after Marlowe‘s alleged death a man is documented who presented himself for admissions to St.Albans, The English Colledge at Valladolid in Spain. - The College Register (Liber Alumnorum) shows the entry:
Jo. {hann}Matheus {John Mathew}
Right Margins. al {ias} Christopher Marlerus {Christopher Marlowe}
1602 [July 4]
A letter by William Vaughan from Pisa (Italy) to the English Royal court was discovered by Leslie Hotson, wherein you read...
„,,,in the said seminary there is....one Christopher Marlor (as he will be called) but yet for certainty his name is Christopher, sometimes Master of Arts of Trinity Colledge in Cambridge, of very low stature,well set of black round beard, nor yet priest, but to come over in the mission of the next year ensuing....
1604 [Aug.3 - Sept.23]
Gatehouse (Prison)London Westminster
Committed by my Lo: Chief Justice Christopher Marlowe, alias Matheus, a seminary priest oweth for 7 weeks and 2 days
_____________________________________________
The influential Marlowian Peter Farey has discussed the subject but came to the opposite conclusion that a certain „John„ Mathew used the alias name of Christopher Marlowe.
Farey‘s logic is, however not convincing... given all arguments and facts
http://marlowe-shakespeare.blogspot.com/2010/07/john-matthew-alias-christopher-marlowe.html
For an abundance of reasons, ( click links). there can be little doubt, that Christopher Marlowe used the name „Mathew“ as an alias Name , he used , however „Tobias“ ,or „Tobie“ (Mathew) as the prename.
The fact, that Francis Bacon (living at the same time as Marlowe /Shakespeare in the same City in London) in his entire life never ever used or wrote the name „Shakespeare needs a plausible explanation: Bacons impressive contents of his documented correspondence with „his alter ego“ Tobie Mathew clearly prove, that Tobie Matthew was an alias for concealed Marlowe/Shakespeare.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4QMuAf1eRRtu9QuX40MoQ
http://marlowe-shakespeare.blogspot.com/2010/07/john-matthew-alias-christopher-marlowe.html
_________________________________
For an abundance of reasons, ( click links). there can be little doubt, that Christopher Marlowe used the name „Mathew“ as an alias Name , he used , however „Tobias“ ,or „Tobie“ (Mathew) as the prename.
The fact, that Francis Bacon (living at the same time as Marlowe /Shakespeare in the same City in London) in his entire life never ever used or wrote the name „Shakespeare needs a plausible explanation: Bacons impressive contents of his documented correspondence with „his alter ego“ Tobie Mathew clearly prove, that Tobie Matthew was an alias for concealed Marlowe/Shakespeare.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz4QMuAf1eRRtu9QuX40MoQ
