From a scientific perspective, it is difficult to understand why you will be criticized as a conspiracy theorist, if you advance a proper scientific theory...
False Candidates and False Flags
In order to estimate wether the Marlowe/Shakespeare theory is correct that Shakspere ["Will of the records"] and Shake-speare ["Will of the works"] were not identical, you may consider four individual probabilities on the basis of a rather low, conservative estimate
1) OVERLAP: Estimated probability that the 2 poets [Marlowe/ Shakespeare], born in the same year, living both in London, did not timely overlap in their literary activity a single day: 1 : 100000 **
2) EDUCATION: Estimated probability that the universal education, languages and world knowledge of Shakespeare can not be taken from the school education from Stratford: 1: 100000
3) ARISTOCRACY : Estimated probability that Shakespeare has not resided in circles of the court and aristocracy for a single day of his life: 1: 100000 , whereas 95% of his plays happens at courts
4) WILL: Estimated probability that Shakespeare did not leave a book, manucript or a “literary” legacy in his last will 1: 100000
2) EDUCATION: Estimated probability that the universal education, languages and world knowledge of Shakespeare can not be taken from the school education from Stratford: 1: 100000
3) ARISTOCRACY : Estimated probability that Shakespeare has not resided in circles of the court and aristocracy for a single day of his life: 1: 100000 , whereas 95% of his plays happens at courts
4) WILL: Estimated probability that Shakespeare did not leave a book, manucript or a “literary” legacy in his last will 1: 100000
These four singular probabilities results in an [extreme low] overall probability of 1: 100 000 000 000 000 000 000 [10 to the power of 20] that Shakspere was identical with Shake-speare.
Thus the "non-identity hypothesis"
may be considered to be proven.
-- This, however, is not challenging literary scholars. Such "scientific methods and standards" often are not even known or they will not be considered.
But there are no other scientific methods in order to interpret probabilities as security in the personal assessment of facts "objectively". From a scientific perspective, it is difficult to understand why you will be criticized as a conspiracy theorist, if you advance the thesis that Shakspere and Shakespeare were not identical
------------------
It strongly reminds me on the fact that you will be branded in the public eye as a conspiracy theorist, when you declare that there is no possible way that WTC-7 building could have collapsed the way it did from fire.
The world should remain resolute, sooner or later the authorship problem (false candidate) and the WTC-7 Problem (false flag) will be solved.
