Why Christopher Schmidt discussed the Marlowe theory
but did neither mention the name of the author
nor the title of the book?
The journalist Christopher Schmidt (who recently died unexpectedly ) led a full-page interview in the Feuilleton of the Süddeutsche Zeitung in 2011 with todays best known german Shakespeare translator Frank Günther (deceased october 2020) and asked him on a recent book about the Marlowe theory of a Munich neurologist? (s.Faksimile)
It is noticeable that Mr. Christopher Schmidt
* did neither mention the name of the author nor the title of this book
* did accept Günthers disparagement of the book
* and gave large room to Günters bizarre theory of the QUEEN as Shakspeares most likely candidate
What is the most plausible interpretation for Schmidts bizarr journalistic approach not to identify author and title related to a main topic of his article in the Süddeutsche Zeitung?
