3 Jan 2015

(3) Why a renewed Shakespeare Authorship Debate ? [Part 3]



....
because it's time to oppose the counter-productive, ludicrous Argument of the high number of putative Shakespeare candidates (>75). 

The unrealistic high  number has early discredited the authorship debate  and was promoted deliberately by Shakespeare experts:

Stanley Wells: "The very idea that so many peoples have been suggested as the author of Shakespeare works in itself to me is enough to show that it is a mad idea, it's just crazy

The exorbitant number of "literary" contemporaries within half a century in London did not evolve - as commonly believed - from a  flourishing literary era in Elizabethan England but from the abundance of the creative power of a "presumed dead" poetic genius disguised and camouflaged with excessively many names. 

The name "Shakspeare"  (taken as a masking name from a living person for safety reasons) as one of those names had been forced on the poet's genius primarily as permission of the crown to continue his career as a playwright.
 but paradoxically its cause!









(Video) The Shakespeare Authorship 
was a Conspiracy 
[false flag operation]
or a clandestine rescue
operation of the Crown !

It is not a

->Conspiracy Theory!.!(s.Video)