The obvious reasons for the failure of a Shakespeare authorship debate....
Shouldn`t one eventually abandon the "second best" Shakspeare-authorship theory" (The Earl of Oxford) ?
 It exists a →final roll-in from a three-hour teleconferenced life debate on the Shakespeare Authorship Issue, "Uncovering Shakespeare, Sept.17th 1992. It included comments by David Bevington, Charles Champlin, Fr. Francis Edwards, SJ., John Savage, Charles Boyle, Earle Hyman, Roger Stritmatter, Paul Nitze, Deborah Bacon and Don Richardson. - On the panel, moderated by William F. Buckley, Jr., were Charles Vere, Earl of Burford, Gary Taylor, Felicia Londré, Warren Hope, Tom Bethell, and Rebecca Flynn. The →final written update (click also Video!) reveals, why the debate ended without any concrete results. The failure of any progress occured, because the debate dealt almost exclusively with the Oxford-Shakespeare Theory and with Oxfordians... . - Hasn't time come to convince younger generations that the centuries-old unscientific Dogma: Shakspere (Stratford) equals William Shakespeare (author of the plays) has to be abandoned in favor of a more robust scientific Paradigm: →Marlowe equals William Shakespeare (pseudonym) →Overwhelming arguments and evidence show that by giving up the "second best" Shakspeare-authorship theory (The Earl of Oxford) in favour of accepting a historical "life-saving" plot (Marlowe had to give up his identity and name), virtally all unsolved questions concerning the century-old Shakespeare authorship debate can be answered. |
