Why Oxfordians for a century have not even begun to tackle the 1604 issue
with its abundance of insoluble literary, psychological, historical and so many other conflicts ?
_______________________________________________________
|
|
One baffling Oxymoron or irony in literary history is that the two most influential candidates for Shakespeare's Authorship , Edward de Vere , 17th Earl of Oxford (†1604) and Christopher Marlowe (†1593) both died too early to be seriously discussed .-
Whereas the date of death (1604) of Edward de Vere is not in doubt, Christopher Marlowe's exact death year today is in doubt and has even been questioned in the poets Corner of Westminster Abbey
Edward de Vere's death (1604) occured much too early....
Accepting the enforced faked death of Marlowe (1593) there would be no need to struggle with the issue of the Oxford Shakespeare authorship and Oxfords untimely death raising endless questions
Whereas the date of death (1604) of Edward de Vere is not in doubt, Christopher Marlowe's exact death year today is in doubt and has even been questioned in the poets Corner of Westminster Abbey
Edward de Vere's death (1604) occured much too early....
Accepting the enforced faked death of Marlowe (1593) there would be no need to struggle with the issue of the Oxford Shakespeare authorship and Oxfords untimely death raising endless questions
Why Oxfordians for a century have not even begun to tackle the 1604 issue with its abundance of insoluble literary, psychological, historical and so many other conflicts ?
.. Without any doubt, in the long run, Christopher Marlowe holds the better cards.
The most serious viewed YouTube Videos related to the Shakespeare Authorship conspiracy !