27 Oct 2016

(479) In 1645 the"true" Shakespeare, still alive, disclosed the authorship conspiracy and his "false"frontman

The poetical satiric-allegoricall law-suit "The Great Assises (1645)" 

can only be understood when accepting a Shakespeare/Marlowe Authorship conspiracy!
___________________________

In  1645 the "true" author wished that the "Typographie", an instrument of art, had never been used! [i.e. that his "artificial" penname Shakespeare had been adapted "typografically"  from the real William Shaksper, Stratford] who possessed ..... [s.below 










                          ... a pernicious head
                          ... who has in Art no interest
                          ... an employed  Paper-waster
                          ... a Mercenary soule
                          ... a Poetaster
                          ... a Mercinary pen-men of the Stage
                          ... a Delinquent  here:
Shakespear       ... a Mimicke
                           ... an Errour of the Muses
                           ... an Abortive Witt
                                                 ... a foule fountain of abuse
                           ... a reptile equivocally bred
                                        under
  some  hedge


Characterisation of the
 "false Shakespeare" from Stratford.










It indicates that from the early beginning  there were advocates of the Shakespeare authorship plot claiming that 

it was a “matter of Typography”. -   

Different spelling implied, as R.C. Churchill ["Shakespeare and his betters" 1958) puts it, "that there must have been two men: one, the Stratford man whom they mostly call 'Shaksper' or 'Shakspere', the other the real author  whom they call 'Shakespeare' or 'Shake-speare' (with the hyphen)."  

Twenty years after the appearance ot the "First Folio" in 1644 the anonymous author of "The Great Assises" [the true Shakespeare alias Torquato Tasso, alias Marlowe, alias  alias alias ...] wished that an instrument of art (the "Typographie") had never been used! [Shakspeare versus Shak e speare] which characterized  "the false Shakspeare" as a mercinary pen-men of the Stage, as a delinquent , a Mimicke , as an errour of the Muses, as an abortive witt, as  foul fountain of abuses, as a Reptile bred under some hedge,, not in geniall bed, where lovely art  with a brave wit conjoyn'd engenders poets of the noblest Kind  [the "true Shakespeare"]

________________________ 

__________________________