How to tackle the Shakespeare Authorship Controversy?
Unique significances and texts of "lesser known" authors between 1593 and 1655 (see examples of faksimile title pages of a few of those "authors") can be identified as the second life of "Marlowe" under feigned identities, names and initials [incl.Shake-speare].
I suppose, the majority of readers will consider this view as ridiculous or absurd, but hardly anyone has ever read and examined these texts in detail ( e.g. EEBO, Early English Books Online) and their backgrounds....
There is an absolute need of a reversal
of the Shakespeare Authorship approach!
The logic of the approach must be reversed today since the dogma
("Because Marlowe's death is acknowledged in 1593, accordingly 1000 arguments must be untrue or incorrect!"),
needs to be reversed today in a scientific contradiction-free paradigm
("Since 1000 arguments for Marlowe/contra Shakspere of Stratford
exist, the singular "argument of Marlowe's death has to be false.")
