24 Mar 2015

(85) Give a reason!: the Marlowe/Shakespeare thesis systematically supressed?

   The fatal "Academe Shakespeare Establishment" acts like 

a "hermetic" gang 






In 33 figures of 18 Shakespeare Plays the figure is  supposedly dead, not less than seven deliberately staged deaths take place, three of which were feigned in order to escape a deadly threat .

Shakespeare's  obsessive referrals in his plays

a) to a false death ,
b) to a permanent loss of name and identity
c) to banishment  and   exile
d) to a life in darkness and concealment

exhibit strong autobiographic aspects and are  compatible with Marlowe's life motif and trauma and should be a legitimate base for a plausible working hypothesis in the Shakespeare authorship debate and research.-

Why to this day such  concepts or ways of thinking had no consequences for literary science?  
Why the fertile concept of a scientific working hypothesis ("... let's assume  Marlowe's death  had to be faked to rescue the poetic genius life with all the consequences of unknown lasting, changing identities and names") was not used to tackle the Shakespeare authorship question?
Why the basic assumption of the authorship of Shakespeare as Marlowe,  bodily masked by Will (Stratford) , has never been systematically examined?

Almost all of   seemingly unsolvable  questions  related to Shakspere's authorship  can  be answered on the basis of the MARLOWE working hypothesis....