William Shakespeare – The Bard succeeds brilliantly at reinforcing belief. It fails entirely as critical history. Its purpose is reassurance: to confirm what audiences already think they know. But scholarship worthy of the name does not protect comforting narratives; it tests them against evidence, contradiction, and doubt.
The tragedy of this documentary is not that it defends Shakespearean authorship. It is that it never risks examining whether the defense is necessary.
Until such examination occurs, the authorship question will persist — not as heresy, but as an unresolved historical problem waiting for intellectual courage.
—————-
CONSIDER…
…that the authorship becomes only solvable, when accepting Marlowe as the true/real Shake-speare, (study videos below) The name Shake-speare belonging to an inconceivable multiplicity of pseudonyms [adopted by Marlowe] including Drayton, Chapman, Wither, Heywood , Barnfield, Breton , Clapham, Taylor, Basse ,Beaumont, Fletcher , Middleton and more
For argumentative details study Marlowe -video Archive below!
No comments:
Post a Comment