https://youtu.be/7wUovIfqar8?is=rWnA9lA7PqdjGXM9
In this 30 min Video the author lets Christopher Marlowe conveniently “die” in 1614 for one simple reason: (??). Marlowe is dangerous to the Oxfordian narrative. Unlike Edward de Vere, Marlowe possesses demonstrable poetic genius, theatrical experience, and a clear stylistic path leading directly into Shakespeare. If Marlowe were allowed continued creative life, the need for an aristocratic hidden author would largely disappear.
Instead of confronting this problem, the author removes Marlowe from the stage without granting him meaningful credit. Literary continuity is ignored, and biography replaces evidence. De Vere is elevated not because the works demand him, but because the theory requires him.
This is not historical reasoning but narrative management. Marlowe is not disproved — he is simply silenced, so that Oxford can remain Shakespeare.
————————-
No comments:
Post a Comment