This is an engaging and thoughtful presentation of the Shakespeare authorship question. Elizabeth Winkler clearly demonstrates that serious doubts exist about the traditional attribution and deals with the 3 most plausible alternative candidates such as Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, and Edward de Vere.
But one important question remains unanswered. If the evidence is strong enough to justify presenting these 3 candidates and questioning the Stratford attribution, why does Elisabeth stop short of identifying the most probable one?
Scholarly caution is understandable. Yet at some point a discussion [of
an entire century!!] must move from simply listing possibilities to evaluating them. Otherwise the audience is left with the impression that the issue is raised—but not truly confronted.
So the obvious question is:
WHICH candidate does Elizabeth Winkler herself consider the most convincing—and
WHY does she hesitate to say so openly?
The absurdity of
the authorship
https://youtu.be/1MkwdE7nZ-w?is=1xlbMkAvp99gCXKB
Some 170 Videos dealing with the Marlowe S O L U T I O N
https://m.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550/videos,
SELECT — 1 —->> Video /. SELECT — 2 —-> popular
No comments:
Post a Comment