Stephen Greenblatt presents Christopher Marlowe as the brilliant revolutionary who transformed English drama but died in 1593, thereby preparing the stage for the (independent?) genius of William Shakespeare. In Greenblatts view, Shakespeare learned from Marlowe’s innovations in blank verse, ambition, and dramatic psychology, then surpassed his „predecessor“ through artistic development within the cultural conditions of Elizabethan England.
The Marlovian theory, by contrast, interprets Marlowe’s reported death as clearly questionable and proposes (since at the same time his life was deadly endangered) he was forced to feign his death , abandon name and identity and continued writing under multiple pseudonyms, including Shakespeare, Drayton, Wither , Chapman ,Heywood, Barnfield, Davies and more,
Greenblatt sees two distinct geniuses (of exactly the same age !!) connected by influence, Marlovians see a single evolving author whose style and intellectual continuity extend across both Marlovian
and Shakespearean works.
Thus the essential divide lies in historical interpretation: Greenblatt explains Shakespeare through cultural succession and documented biography, while the Marlovian position explains Shakespeare through concealment, pseudonymity, and the possibility that literary history deliberately masked the true author.
\
No comments:
Post a Comment