For centuries, the question of Shakespeare's authorship has puzzled readers, scholars, and researchers.
This blog presents a comprehensive solution:
The Multi-Pseudonymity Theory (MPT).
According to my research, Christopher Marlowe — officially declared dead in 1593 — survived and continued to write under multiple pseudonyms.
26 per cent think Shakespeare didn’t write all the plays attributed to him.
This is in strange contrast to the statement of University of Warwick Shakespeare expert
<----- Dr Stephen Purcell
that “nearly all professional Shakespearean scholars agree that William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon was the author of the works attributed to him. How to explain this discrepancy?
It seems rather dishonest, that Wells deliberately obscures the problem by
falsifying (align) the Spelling of the name of the Stratfordman.
There exist no "familiar" records (like babtism, wedding, births, deaths, will, signatures) wheresoever, showing the Stratford mans name written
as "S h a k e" instead of "Shak".
By claiming with the books title phrase that the two names are the same, and spelling them the same, Wells deliberately misleads the reader from the beginning into thinking that the Stratford man of course could only have been the author.
If Wells would have been an honest man he would have put the question:
Why Mr. Shakspeare[from Stratford] was the author Shakespeare [of the "Sonnets" or of "Romeo and Juliet?]" or simplified ‘
WHY
S H A K SP E A R E WAS
S H A K E S P E AR E ???
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Video Ros Barber
What may be the reason that Ros Barber in her online Project "Shakespeare The Evidence" follows the footsteps of Stanley Wells : Why did she started her deserving project by initially obscuring it [asking : "Did Shakespeare write Shakespeare"] instead of clarifying it? Ok! I admit: it sounds more sexy!
Why not : e.g. "Did William the businessman from Stratford
Video Excerpt from the Marlowe/ Documentary <----- Listen to Stanley Wells about
90 min) by Michael Rubbo. Marlowe (from 2:22 to 2:47min) ---------------------------------------------------------
How can it be, that the great Shakespeare expert Stanley Wells sees Marlowes literary achievements at the age of both (30) greater than that of Shakespeare??
-----------Wells on MARLOWE (in Video above)-----------------------------------
Listen to the opinion of Stanley WELLS on M AR LO W E
at the time of his elledged death:
" If Shakespeare had died at the age, when Marlowe died - I think - we should now regard MARLOWE as the greater Dramatist.---The achievements by the time of Marlowe'sdeath,1593 [they were both born in the same year, 1564] was greater - I think- than that of Shakespeare, by that age, Marlowe had a stream of great plays: Dr.Faustus, Edward II, Tamburlaine (1&2), The Jew of Malta,......
......unless the Marlowe-Shakespeare authorship thesis
(a true historicall conspiracy !) is no longer disposed
at the landfill of conpiracy theories ....
The Stratford Dogma causes more problems than it solves.
Its widely-held prevailing concept needs a paradigm shift, a reorientation involving the incorporation of new concepts into mainstream thoughts, seemingly contradictory or radically different from the traditional view.
The seemingly never-ending controversy of Shakespeare's authorship is resolvable.
The very many unanswered questions posed in this video
can be answered without exception and without compulsion,
if accepting a historically necessitated conspiracy:
There was only one truly great poetic genius in his time,Christopher Marlowe, who in his 30th year (May 1593) was threatened by execution, following slanderous accusations against him by the English crown and church.
A feigned death, staged in Deptford with the help of the Queen and her Senior adviser William Cecil, saw him banished for his own safety, but at the price of a permanent change of name and identity.
This thesis, followed by the continuance of his writing under multiple masking pseudonyms, including Shakespeare, is valid, not merely hypothetical. We reach it with a high degree of certainty. It should end the bizarre and historically unique authorship debate.
The camouflaging pen-name Shakespeare was adopted in June 1593 and used on a single-page dedication for the poem "Venus and Adonis", ten days after Marlowe’s body was allegedly buried in St Nicholas churchyard on the edge of Greenwich and Deptford.
We suggest that the name was used because the businessman William Shakspere of Stratford was on the spot in London and was paid to add extra pseudonymous ‘cover’ for Marlowe’s escape. His evocative "masking" Name bought silence and a future gravesite to ensure the survival of the poet genius. -
The "covert situation" reminds one to current practices of hidden "false flag" covert operations ("insider jobs" such as WTC-7).
There exists a negative correlation between "Stratfordianism" and the amount "of specific Knowledge"!
Using Ground-Radar Sytsems(GRS) archaeologists (having investigated William Shakespeare's grave at England's Holy Trinity Church in Stratford-upon-Avon)
discovered Shakespeare's skull and bones are missing.-
The grave is empty.
The research team's leader Kevin Colls :
It's very, very convincing to me that his skull isn't at Holy Trinity at all.".
There was a great media coverage of this event. (-1- , -2- , -3-, -4- , -5-) Since it is a sacriledge to question William of Stratford as the author of "Hamlet" researchers at once had to dig out a longstanding (forgotten?) old myth :
grave robbers stole Shakespeare's skull in 1794.
Why on earth the public media is following the establishment (Britains Tourist industry and "Shakespeare's Birthplace Trust) which have to take the identity between William Shakspere (Stratford) and William Shakespeare ( the author of the Plays)
for granted?
Why they didn't at least discuss the possibility that the findings could have someting to do with the
