What a dishonesty?
Why deliberately obscuring 2 different personalities...
...with an identical spelling & without a question mark??
 |  |
Stanley Wells, renowned Shakespeare expert and former Head of the →"Shakespeare Birthplace Trust" published Febr.4th 2014 an e-book entitled
" Why Shakespeare was Shakespeare!"
It seems rather dishonest, that Wells deliberately obscures the problem by
falsifying (align) the Spelling of the name of the Stratfordman.
There exist no "familiar" records (like babtism, wedding, births, deaths, will, signatures) wheresoever, showing the Stratford mans name written as "S h a k e" instead of "Shak".
There exist no "familiar" records (like babtism, wedding, births, deaths, will, signatures) wheresoever, showing the Stratford mans name written as "S h a k e" instead of "Shak".
By claiming with the books title phrase that the two names are the same, and spelling them the same, Wells deliberately misleads the reader from the beginning into thinking that the Stratford man of course could only have been the author.
If Wells would have been an honest man he would have put the question:
Why Mr. Shakspeare [from Stratford] was the author Shakespeare [of the "Sonnets" or of "Romeo and Juliet?]" or simplified
If Wells would have been an honest man he would have put the question:
Why Mr. Shakspeare [from Stratford] was the author Shakespeare [of the "Sonnets" or of "Romeo and Juliet?]" or simplified
Why Shakspere was Shakespeare ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Video Ros Barber
Video Ros Barber
What may be the reason that Ros Barber in her online Project "Shakespeare The Evidence" follows the footsteps of Stanley Wells : Why did she started her deserving project by initially obscuring it [asking : "Did Shakespeare write Shakespeare"] instead of clarifying it? Ok! I admit: it sounds more sexy!
Why not : e.g. "Did William the businessman from Stratford
write "Romeo & Juliet" and "Hamlet"?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Video Excerpt from the Marlowe/ Documentary <----- Listen to Stanley Wells about
90 min) by Michael Rubbo. Marlowe (from 2:22 to 2:47min) ---------------------------------------------------------
How can it be, that the great Shakespeare expert Stanley Wells sees Marlowes literary achievements at the age of both(30) greater than that of Shakespeare,
-----------Wells on MARLOWE (in Video above)-----------------------------------
Listen:
Stanley WELLS: " If Shakespeare had died at the age, when Marlowe died - I think - we should now regard MARLOWE as the greater Dramatist.---The achievements by the time of Marlowe's death,1593 [they were both born in the same year, 1564] was greater - I think- than that of Shakespeare, by that age,
Marlowe had a stream of great plays: Dr.Faustus, Edward II, 2 Tamburlaine, The jew of Malta,......
0 Comments
