MARLOWE had to invent his Pseudonyms such as SHAKE-SPEARE... but many more.: March 2016

31 Mar 2016

(407) The confessions of the "true" Shakespeare. ( Polimanteia Part 5 )

The confessions of the "true" Shakespeare. ( Polimanteia Part 5 )

"...since the day of my first birth, since the time I was called by Religious Name..."

In "Polimanteia" (1595) the author W.C., which cannot safely be identified, wrote a remarkable "speech": "A religious Speech" dedicated "to Englands Children", i.e. to the next generations to come.

[The last speech is a "Loaylties speech to Englands children]-

In his introductory dedication to Robert Devereux [The Earl of Essex] the self-confident author W.C. declares, that he "takes upon himself Englands Person and speaks like a Commonwealth" and that the Earle should take the paper as "the countries talke".

The author gives the Earl of Essex, Robert Devereux some remarkable facts to understand about himself, that:

1) he foresaw that all miseries, harmes, wants, tragedies and whatelse soever the world deemed hatefull, should bee falsely suposed to be triggered by him ("proceede out of his wombe")

2) since the day of his first birth

3) since he first "shined weekely" in these coastes (SOED "shine:" of persons to be brilliant in ability, character, achievement or Position, to be eminent, to excell [old engl.]

4) since the times he was called by a Religious name. - He has lived now so long, that he finds it true, that he will be pardoned...and he concludes this sentence by saying that he never caused, either kingdome to be desolate, prince to bee distressed, people to despaire or any private person to be malecontent.«

-------------------

If the author talks about his "first" birth, then there must have been a "second" birth. - This would best fit with the assumption, that the author was Marlowe, who had to accept a second birth after changing his identity.

If the author declares that at his first birth, he was called by Religious Name, this would nicely fit to Christopher [Marlowe]

For countless reasons the "Religious speech" (as well as the "Loyalties Speech") to "Englands Children" reveal that there can be no doubt whatsoever

the author was Marlowe/alias Shakespeare. - This insight, however, has to be denied as long as one overlooks the concealed Marlowe / Shakespeare Authorship Problem.

Behind the author W.C. of "Polimanteia" hides an outstanding polymath,

both artistically gifted and self-confident. -

The author seems to be identical with [a pseudonym] W.Clarke " to whom John Davies dedicated his epigram 143

[most likely : Marlowe [alias Shakespeare/ and alias other pseudonyms]

--------------

"Scourge of Folly" (1611: John Davies of Hereford)

»Polimanteia"(1595) by „W.C.“ would probably be completely forgotten today (similar to "Willobie his Avisa" 1594) if it had not remained of some literary historicall interest because of the first mentioning ever (!) of “literary Shake-speare" (and "Lucrece").

In the 19th century an expert proposed in W.C. »William Cowell” a graduate of the University of Cambridge". With higher plausibility, however W.C. stands for the pseudonym "William Clarke (or Clerke)" who treated the issue of illegitimate descent in "The Triall of Bastardie" 1594.

A few years later (1598) a certain T.B. ("Thomas Bastard") in his book "Chrestoleros Seven bookes of Epigrames” made it seem plausible that behind the two shortcuts (W.C. and T.B.) the same poet was concealed, whom the subject of his own lineage was driving around…

Epigr.143

About William Clarke:

What do we know about the background of W.C., William Clarke (or Clerke) ? In »The Scourge of Folly« (1611) John Davies has described him highly condensed and informative in Epigramm 143 (s. Faksimile). There we learn: He is

(1) »The sole fast friend of Elbo-clokes«. indicative of a person, permanently writing at his desk

(2) with the »Countenance of obsolete Buskins« (SOED „buskin“ ambiguous fig./trans.: the tragic vein, tragedy )

(3) with »the grace of velvet Day-capps«, indicative of a clerk[Clarke],lawyer/scholar, there are many reasons to assume that Marlowe has been at the London Court of Innes

(4) »remarkable for mellowed wisdome« , an Attribute applicable to Marlowe/Shakespeare but hardly on Clarke [H.Petowe: »Marlow admir'd, whose honey-flowing vaine.«

(5) »abounding in his private-publike printed Poetry;« applicable to Marlowe/Shakespeare but not on Clarke

(6) »sententious Apothegmes at meales«

(7) »Maister« W.Clarke, The Master title M.A. can be evidenced for Marlowe, not for Clarke

(8) »attending without processe the Starre-chamber«), [20.Mai 1593] A warrant was issued by the Church's Star Chamber for the poet's [Marlowe's] arrest on charges of heresy, which carried the death penalty.-

(9) »Clarke, Thou hast wit at all« well known for Marlowe/Shakespeare, not for a W.Clarke

(10) »in thy Staff’s Head«,[SOED Staff arch.ME†,b a speare or launce, something which serves as a support or stay): Notice the wordplay with »Staffe,Stafs,Staffs,etc (a character, a letter, a body of persons

(11) »Yea, may interre thee too, when thou art dead« indicating that he himself is already interred and dead

(12) »And in distresse it is a Staffe of Staye«) indicating that he will permanently remain the shaft of a staff bearing the [name Shake-]speare(?) -

(13) »Thy Silver-Head‘s worne out with Wisdomes cares« Notice the multiple repetition of »silver« head /haire ( indicative of SOED (1594) : Eloquent sweet-spoken," [Marlowe/alias Shakespeare 1611 at the age of 47)].

(14) »but at a stay stands thy Stafs silver Head: «

(15) »As thy Stafs silver Head is covered« , it fits to Marlowe, difficult to interprete for Clarke

(16) So hide it (Clarke) with Silke (as fit, as fine). Indicative of a continued necessity Marlowe's to hide himself,

(17) »Sith it shewes all the hidden wit in thine): the hidden creative genius is compatiple with Marlowe/Shakespeare
______________________________

Thus Epigramm 143 outlines in a highly condensed fashion (1-17) a scholar , who holds a series of positions ,who had to attend without processe the Star chamber (only known for Marlowe 1593), who is remarkable for his mellowed wisdom, abounding in private-public poetry , but who had to hide himself , a great hidden wit…. . All this cannot be assigned to an unknown "W.C.[William Clerke].

A proposal: behind the author W.C. of "Polimanteia" hides an outstanding polymath, both artistically gifted and self-confident. - most likely : Marlowe [alias Shakespeare/ and alias other pseudonyms]

The author of Polimanteia:

...mine owne inhabitants did worke my ouerthrowe …

... banish without cause «..

.» for undoubtedly I had dyed but I was immortall...«

_________________

„W.C.“, the true author of „Polimanteia" (="multiple meanings")! can only have been, concealed Marlowe (alias Shakespeare) , if you take the entire context of the book into consideration.

_________________

In the second part of "Polimanteia",1595 ("ENGLAND TO ALL HER INHABITANTS") the author wrestles with his destiny.

He reveals himself as a highly sensitive, self-confident and educated artistic personality. The atmosphere is reminiscent in many passages to Shakespearean sonnets. He seems to cry out his fall and suffering his fate formally and denounces his own excessive and unjustified treatment.

Some excerpts:
»(…) my unsufferable & unpitied griefe, Modestie & Sobrietie are changed into all manner of dissolution.«
»(…) of the land, hath such as being displeased with mee, (…) it must needes happen that my joynts being racked with so great a torment, I live feeble, & confesse that mine owne inhabitants did worke my ouerthrowe (…)«
»(…) did I banish without cause, (…) to live distressed in a forraine countrie? did I hide nigardly the benefites of my peace, and plentie from them?«
»(…) When you shall finde they slander me but of inconstancie, your brethren of heresie, themselves of pitie and only to this end, the more easily to spoyle mee and the more deadly«
»(…) then seeing her [Elizabeth] to have such prerogative, finding to rule over so many subjects and fearing shee would banish me to haven, from whence I first came.«
»(…) Judge now, if ever creature of my innocencie and I may boldly stand to justifie my own integrity) hath had greater cause to complaine of wrong: more iust reason to suspect violence: & more true grounds of undoubted feare then I, that have sued?«
»(…) give me leave womanlike to complain (though hopelesse without reliefe) of wrongs offered to my person; instead of offering, I have suffered; instead of doing, I have receiued such manifest violence, such apparant wrongs, such secret disgraces, such open iniuries: as when I shall make report what I have indured for my names sake«
»(…) without houses, lands, or other obsessions, not retaining so much as the shadowe of a Common wealth since that I cruelly was banished from amongst them«
»(…) let the world iudge, if ever any receiued greater wrong, then I have suffered. (…) and to make me perish if it had been possible; (for vndoubtedly I had dyed but that I was immortall).«
»(…) from hence proceeded the fatall calamitie of my fortune: Councels against Councels: Confessions against Confessions; Accusations, Defences.«
»Banishments, and cruell Martyrdomes, Doe you heare and credit me, and yet for all this take me to have offered wrong & suffered none? Nay, when I (scarfull) had taken my selfe into the inner parts of Europe for feare of harme, then had I (in all likelihood) been banished from this Iland«
»(…) not to bee branded with so foule a shame; not to be noted with so blacke a marke; not to be called by so bad a name, have endavoured to signify their sinister practices by a good pretence, and have imployed such for the no idlenes, because all did labour: and are not the same banished from our land, howsoever procured by a better cause?«

If all historical and contemporary figures mentioned in "Polimanteia"(1595), all mythical or literary figures, all areas of knowledge and wisdom, all events and conflicts related to Marlowe/alias Shakespeare's work or life, are considered, it can safely be concluded that

The author of "Polimanteia" and Shakespeare / Marlowe must have been one and the same (identical) person!

Even if one picks out only the names of the characters, the references to Shakespeare plays (not yet written) such as "Caesar," "Pericles," "Henry VIII." "Antony and Cleopatra," "King Lear" , "Richard III." "The Tempest," "Lucretia [" Tarquin !] ") or to Marlowe-pieces (such as" Edward II/III." "Massacre of Paris," "Tamerlane " [Parthian], "Dido" [Carthage]), it seems virtually impossible, to consider these contexts as independent, accidental or random.....

Excerpt of the Title page.
whose fall of a coommonwealth you are asked to judge.

Since "Stratfordian/Oxfordian/Oxfraudian" Shakespeare-Experts are not even ready to consider the possibility of a Marlowe/Shakespeare identity, they should at least be able to make a proposal of who else „W.C.“, the true author of „Polimanteia"(="multiple meanings")! might have been, taken the entire context of the book into consideration.

The Author of Polimanteia:

"...mine owne inhabitants did worke my ouerthrowe … banish without cause«...»

for undoubtedly I had dyed but I was immortall..".«

_________________

„W.C.“, the true author of „Polimanteia" (="multiple meanings")! can only have been, concealed Marlowe (alias Shakespeare) , if you take the entire context of the book into consideration.

_________________

In the second part of "Polimanteia",1595 ("ENGLAND TO ALL HER INHABITANTS") the author wrestles with his destiny.

He reveals himself as a highly sensitive, self-confident and educated artistic personality. The atmosphere is reminiscent in many passages to Shakespearean sonnets.

He seems to cry out his fall and suffering his fate formally and denounces his own excessive and unjustified treatment.

Some excerpts:
»(…) my unsufferable & unpitied griefe, Modestie & Sobrietie are changed into all manner of dissolution.«
»(…) of the land, hath such as being displeased with mee, (…) it must needes happen that my joynts being racked with so great a torment, I live feeble, & confesse that mine owne inhabitants did worke my ouerthrowe (…)«
»(…) did I banish without cause, (…) to live distressed in a forraine countrie? did I hide nigardly the benefites of my peace, and plentie from them?«
»(…) When you shall finde they slander me but of inconstancie, your brethren of heresie, themselves of pitie and only to this end, the more easily to spoyle mee and the more deadly«
»(…) then seeing her [Elizabeth] to have such prerogative, finding to rule over so many subjects and fearing shee would banish me to haven, from whence I first came.«
»(…) Judge now, if ever creature of my innocencie and I may boldly stand to justifie my own integrity) hath had greater cause to complaine of wrong: more iust reason to suspect violence: & more true grounds of undoubted feare then I, that have sued?«
»(…) give me leave womanlike to complain (though hopelesse without reliefe) of wrongs offered to my person; instead of offering, I have suffered; instead of doing, I have receiued such manifest violence, such apparant wrongs, such secret disgraces, such open iniuries: as when I shall make report what I have indured for my names sake«
»(…) without houses, lands, or other obsessions, not retaining so much as the shadowe of a Common wealth since that I cruelly was banished from amongst them«
»(…) let the world iudge, if ever any receiued greater wrong, then I have suffered. (…) and to make me perish if it had been possible; (for vndoubtedly I had dyed but that I was immortall).«
»(…) from hence proceeded the fatall calamitie of my fortune: Councels against Councels: Confessions against Confessions; Accusations, Defences.«
»Banishments, and cruell Martyrdomes, Doe you heare and credit me, and yet for all this take me to have offered wrong & suffered none? Nay, when I (scarfull) had taken my selfe into the inner parts of Europe for feare of harme, then had I (in all likelihood) been banished from this Iland«
»(…) not to bee branded with so foule a shame; not to be noted with so blacke a marke; not to be called by so bad a name, have endavoured to signify their sinister practices by a good pretence, and have imployed such for the no idlenes, because all did labour: and are not the same banished from our land, howsoever procured by a better cause?«

If all historical and contemporary figures mentioned in "Polimanteia"(1595), all mythical or literary figures, all areas of knowledge and wisdom, all events and conflicts related to Marlowe / alias Shakespeare's work or life, are considered, it can safely be concluded that the author of "Polimanteia" and Shakespeare/Marlowe must have been one and the same (identical) person.

Excerpt of the Title page.
whose fall of a coommonwealth you are asked to judge.

No serious Academic Shakespeare expert,

familiar with "Polimanteia (1595)",

seems to have "judged" the Fall of a very special Common-Wealth....

1. Why its author W.C. is asking the reader already on "the title page" (and throughout the book) to "judge his fall" (what is meant by this ? The fall of whom?) and

2. Why it was not the fall of an unknown clergy man -->William Cowell or writer --> William Clerke, but the fall of Marlowe: he clearly identifies himself throughout the book as an outstanding exceptional wit, as the concealed author Christopher Marlowe alias Breton, Percie, Willobie, Lodge, Davies, Drayton , Shakspear a.o.

Page of "Polimanteia"

Early marginal pennames (poets)
of the true Shakespeare

"No-one can seriously assume that "Hamlet" is pure literary fiction:

it contains massive autobiographical traces. No autobiographic connections, however between Hamlet and William (Stratford) could ever be established. -

The metaphor of Marlowes unsubstantial death or murder!
_________________________

The "Ghost Scene"(Click Video) in Shakespeare's "Hamlet" I/5

is a self-revealing "coming-out" of Hamlet [...or of its author, its inner voice , its ghost , "second-selfe", "super-ego".etc...] .-
In "Loves Labors Lost (LLL)" Shakespeare expressed his commonly used "philosophy" or "literary dialogue technique" of presenting his own thoughts and ideas by dividing them bet-ween different subjects. (Most often between himself and his virtues, his muses, his bounties, his second selfe, his ghost, but also behind real or fictive persons ) :

LLL(II/5): Put thyselfe [e.g.Hamlet/alias Shakespeare/Marlowe] in the trick of singularity [your outer voice] She [ your inner voice, Ghost ] thus advises you that sighs for thee.

If you read the dialogue between Hamlet and the Ghost, Act I/5, you may notice that it can be read as the blueprint of Marlowe's destiny, clearly revealing a biographical trace.

Hamlet I/V Ghost scene

Do all those who maintain the Stratfordian position, mean to tell us that we need to believe, that this text is literary fiction and that we will not recognize specific hidden allegoric informations about the author and his biographic situation? -

Nobody must accept that autobiographic interpretation of a coming-out of the author, but then we should expect, that better, more plausible proposals of "autobiographic" meaning of this contextare are given

Hamlet
i render up myself

lend thy hearing to what I shall unfold

doomed for certain time to walk at night

I am forbid to tell the secret of my prison-house

murder most foul, as in the best, it is;

this most foul, strange and unnatural..[murder]

no reckoning made, but to my account.. at once dipatched:

cut off even in the blossom of my sin.

the whole ear of [England] is by a forged process of my death rankly abused

_______________________________

(401) Shakespeare Authorship question: When the Solution is the Problem.-

Good solutions of yesterday can have fatal conseqences if they are put in action today.....

<-- Paul Watzlawick in a famous speech entitled "When the Solution becomes the Problem" (s.Video) expressed:

...."Humans have the fatal tendency to hold on to solutions which have worked one time, even if the informations have changed so much that the solution, which once was the best one may be the only one, is not effective anymore. That is when a solution turns into a Problem!

Why is it so? I suppose that the behavioural economy prompts us to hold on firmly to what has been successfull or at least relevant....
but the good solutions of yesterday can have fatal conseqences if they are put in action today.!

When the Solution (Shakspere from Stratford) is the Problem:

_______________________________

The most creative writer and powerfully eloquent poet of our modern world ,William Shakespeare, did not leave a single written word, letter, message, notice, correspondence.

Be Aware, however: Any written message given away, is forever out of the control of the sender.

Conclusion: William Shakspere (Stratford) cannot have written any letter (unless he wrote under pseudonyms)!

____________________________

Prof.Albrecht Schöne (2015):

Famous German Scholar who wrote the book

"The Letterwriter Goethe"

[Note: The most famous universal german poet Genius of all time "Wolfgang von Goethe" wrote during his lifetime about 20.000 letters !]

(400) Will the "bizarre" Shakespeare authorship question ever disappear? Of course as soon as ....

...will the "bizarre" Shakespeare authorship question ever disappear?

as soon as ....

obscure "controlled" mechanism for prohibiting to search

for a concealed truth will vanish...

In 2 months, for a long time the last major jubilee of William Shakespeare will be celebrated on the occasion of the 400. anniversary of his death. - Despite a strange uniform consensus of the mainstream media and the English Academe for almost 200 years, [.i.e. William Shakespeare of Stratford is identical with the author of the works "Hamlet," "Macbeth" or "Othello"] there exists a global community of sceptics, dissidents, thinkers, skilled foreigners, prominent intellectuals and others (so-called. "Anti-Stratfordians s.blog 150) which question this academic consensus. Since Long, however their arguments and ideas mercilessly are disposed on the landfill of "conspiracy theorists ".

This global community of sceptics fights for the right that the authorship question of Shakespeare may no longer remain hidden as an absolute academic Taboo, but must constitute a legitimate field of scientific research and questioning. It is also time to investigate the deeper motives for such an absolute taboo. The basic problem has not changed over the centuries, it is comparable to today's causes of absolute taboos i.e. of "controlled" mechanism for prohibiting to search for a concealed truth (http://www.wtc7evaluation.org/)

From the fact that the You-Tube documentary "William Shakespeare's: The Conspiracy theories", (which started oct.17. 2014) will soon reach 200,000 views/clicks , one may infer that the Shakespeare Authorship Problem will not van the documentary
It can be predicted with some confidence that the age of digital information transmission ( because of today's accessibility to any resources for everyone) will challenge the "frozen Stratford-dogma" and will lead sooner or later to a "paradigm shift" .

In accordance with all the facts it appears inconceivable that a solution beyond the person Christopher Marlowe is on the horizon!

The Shakespeare authorship deception

disclosed

...not sooner than the disclosure of the WTC-7 [false flag ] deception

What is a False flag ? (Wikipedia)"The contemporary term false flag describes covert operations that are designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them.

Operations carried out during peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government agencies, can (by extension) also be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organization behind an operation."

Bildergebnis für william and robert Cecil

George Bush jr/sen. William and Robert Cecil

The secret activities of mighty fathers and sons

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a secret correspondence betwee James VI of Scotland and Robert Cecil between May 1601 and the Queen's death in March 1603. In this period it was settled that James would succeed Elizabeth, but the diplomatic result was kept secret.

After Essex was executed in 1601 for rebelling against the Queen, Cecil felt free to initiate secret correspondence with King James VI of Scotland, advising the King on ways to cultivate Elizabeth's favour.

As a result of his efforts, the succession, upon Elizabeth's death, passed without incident to James, who maintained Cecil as his secretary of state. He was made Viscount Cranborne in 1604 and earl of Salisbury in 1605.

About Me