14 Nov 2015

(329) You should answer the question: Why Shakespeare did not contribute to the wealth of literary genres in his time?

The tragic failure of the Scademic Shakespeare Expertise

 to even consider the possibility of an authorship problem.




...in order to learn about Shakespeare's personality and his character, about his philosophy and convictions, about  biographical  aspects we are forced to deduct our information and knowledge exclusively from the contents of his plays and his poetic verses. This knowledge leads to some fundamental questions:

What may be the reason, that 

1. the most versatile of all poets of his time,  Shakespeare, did not contribute anything substantial to the range of
literary book genres of his own time? 
-for details click video
 
2)
that Shakespeare himself  did not belong to the leading  group of contemporary writers for all these  
Genres   [for details click video

Conclusion
The academic Shakespeare community was never willing to consider this problem! It would otherwise have been forced to touch the authorship  problem , something the experts wanted to avoid at all costs.

Imagine the idea, that 


our Poet Genius wrote under a multiplicity of code- or pennames ( such as  Drayton, Davies, Basse, Markham, Fletcher, Dekker and so on!)