The tragic failure of the Scademic Shakespeare Expertise
to even consider the possibility of an authorship problem.
...in order to learn about Shakespeare's personality and his character, about his philosophy and convictions, about biographical aspects we are forced to deduct our information and knowledge exclusively from the contents of his plays and his poetic verses. This knowledge leads to some fundamental questions:
What may be the reason, that
1. the most versatile of all poets of his time, Shakespeare, did not contribute anything substantial to the range of literary book genres of his own time? -for details click video
2) that Shakespeare himself did not belong to the leading group of contemporary writers for all these Genres [for details click video
Conclusion:
The academic Shakespeare community was never willing to consider this problem! It would otherwise have been forced to touch the authorship problem , something the experts wanted to avoid at all costs.
Imagine the idea, that
our Poet Genius wrote under a multiplicity of code- or pennames ( such as Drayton, Davies, Basse, Markham, Fletcher, Dekker and so on!)
Imagine the idea, that
our Poet Genius wrote under a multiplicity of code- or pennames ( such as Drayton, Davies, Basse, Markham, Fletcher, Dekker and so on!)