The Total Academic Failure
to develop a consistent Shakespeare authorship theory(2)
*
The small booklet "The Passionate Pilgrime" with 20 poems was published 1599 under the authorname of W. Shakespeare [s.red arrow!].
Strangely, today the poems will only partly be ascribed to Shakespeare, They are seen as a "Composite work" including at least 5 different authors (with William Shakespeare, Christopher Marlowe, Bartholomew Griffin, Henry Willobie, Richard Barnfield) .
How is it conceivable (..is it conceivable at all?) that such a small book of Poems was printed as originating from Shakespeare, but accompanied by additional poems of poets (not mentioned in the book) like
*C. Marlowe,
*B. Griffin, ["Fidessa" Sonnets,1595 ]
*H. Willobie [ "Willobie His Avisa", 1594)
Up to now the "Academic Shakespeare Expertise" cannot possibly explain why the proud, self confident poet William Shakespeare or the Editor W.Jaggard did allow various unidentifiable writers their poems to be added, without giving their names ?
Conclusion: The deeper reason for the total failure of the "Academic Shakespeare Expertise", to search for a consistent explanation of these strange observations lies in the fact, that the most plausible thesis was discarded from the beginning.-
*H. Willobie [ "Willobie His Avisa", 1594)
*R.Barnfield, ["Affectionate Shepheard", 1594)]
Up to now the "Academic Shakespeare Expertise" cannot possibly explain why the proud, self confident poet William Shakespeare or the Editor W.Jaggard did allow various unidentifiable writers their poems to be added, without giving their names ?
Conclusion: The deeper reason for the total failure of the "Academic Shakespeare Expertise", to search for a consistent explanation of these strange observations lies in the fact, that the most plausible thesis was discarded from the beginning.-
Thesis:
