(456) Anti-Stratfordians(1), Anti-Shakespeareans(2)! What's the difference? 2 is a personal attack: You are dishonorable!

The "Academic Establishment" sooner or later will realize  that ignoring the "Shakespeare Doubters" will not make them go away.(s.Video below). Increasingly Shakespeare Academics have started to employ the term "Anti-Shakespearean"  for those who harbor  doubts about  the rationale, that the author of Hamlet is not to be separated from his context. 

Clearly the term "Anti-Shakespeareans"  is misleading and suggests that doubters dislike Shakespeare. Quite the opposite is true: they are higly interested in  the works and their writer. But also the traditional term "Anti-Stratfordian" is unnecessarily contentious. 

The more neutral term "Non-Stratfordian" is preferred-

---

Frank Günther

Frank Guenther, todays most renowned German translator of Shakespeare's works in his book "Our Shakespeare" (2014) calls  those who do not recognize the Stratford-Man as the author of Shakespeare's plays "Anti-Shakespeareans".- One can assume with some certainty that our linguistically most proficient german translator has done this deliberately to disguise its baroque falsifying polemics. By the term "Anti-Shakespeareans" someone is defamed in the first place, because he takes a stand against  Shakespeare. -
To speak out against a business man from Stratford, which had to be chosen as a masking person for life rescue of  the great poet, Günther well knows to put to a stop. Günther clearly uses  this "language imprecision"  strategically:  Only a philistine can have something against Shakespeare! Who would want to be a philistine? The clarifying term "Anti-Stratfordian" Günther fears  like the devil  the holy water in order to disguise or getting around the legitimate authorship problem, he has never tried to understand. -

---

We should   reject attempts to reframe “Non-Stratfordians” as “Anti-Shakespeareans.”