28 Sept 2016

(459)The Marlowe/Shakespeare authorship thesis resolves inconsistencies of Dr.Faustus play(Example1)

False or missing hypotheses concerning  the Shakespeare authorship controversy

 resulted in fatal fallacies of Marlowes Faust Versions A and B  !

________________________________

First Report [1592] of Dr.Faustus "The Historie of the damnable life, ..."by P.F.Gent
 
Second Report [1594] of Dr.Faustus by a Friend of the same Gentleman 
 

 
Excerpt (emblem) of the second report of Dr.Faustus 1594





































2 reports of Dr. Faustus: one prior (1592) and one after (1594) Marlowes death

Quarto-1 of Marlowe's Play Dr.Faustus (1604)  
 The play „The Tragical History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus“, commonly referred to „Doctor Faustus“ [based on a German source] is an Elizabethan tragedy by Christopher Marlowe, that was first performed around 1592, a year before  Marlowe's official death 1593. - It was printed for the first time only 10 years later [Quarto-1 1604 A-text s.Faksimile] . Read also next Blog!

Surprisingly 2 english prose works

1. 1592: "The Historie of the damnable life, and deserved death of Doktor John Faustus", by P.F.gent -

2. 1594: "The second Report of Doktor John Faustus,

containing his appearances and the deedes of Wagner"
by a frend of the same gentleman.: elaborating  the Story
of the magican (s. Title-Faksimiles)

         of an anonymous author  provides the backgrounds of Doktor Faustus.


At first there can be no doubt that both Prosa works on Dr,Faustus were written by the same author, Christopher Marlowe, the author of the Faustus play "The tragicall Historie..." of the same year, 1592. - There is no room here to discuss in detail the many Arguments. But notice that in the preface of the „Second work 1594“  the anonymous author  clearly  admits that even most of the text 1592 certainely is most credible and out of all question" the text contained  many free inventions of the author:  “…..but I have talked with the man that first wrote them [the words], having them from Wagners very friend, wherin he saith many things are corrupted,  some added de novo, some canceld and taken away, &  many were augmented.“ 

Reading the text of "the first report"(1592) undoubtedly the figure of Dr.Faustus is a metaphor for the exceptional nature of the author  himself [Marlowe/alias Shakespeare]   .

Nobody will make us believe that exactly at the time when Marlowe was heavily involved in the literary approach to the historical "Dr.Faustus", 2 independent authors („P.F.Gent“ Prior to Marlowe‘s death and „the frend of the same Gentleman“ after Marlowe’s death) have dealt with the subject of Dr.Faustus.

The "Second Report" (1594) strongly supports the idea that concealed Marlowe was  alive!