(411) The adulatory "media pabulum" (Bardolatry) for William of Stratford during his anniversary

B A R D O L A T R Y

...mainly written by a journalistic juvenile "pseudo-expertise" with always newly copied  concoctions,  makes it necesssary also  to point to  opposing views  (s.Video)

____________________________

Basically science is about doubt.- Someone who does not doubt will not put essential questions .

Academic Shakespeare experts (Synonym. "Stratfordians) have not or never had any doubt ! Thats why they have rejected it from the beginning, to even tackle a single of the numerous problems and inconsistencies of Shakespeare's authorship questions scientifically.!

Usually Research starts with developing and testing  a "working hypothesis"  challenging current paradigms. e.g.

a) Is William Shakspere (Stratford) identical with William  Shakespeare (Author of  "Macbeth" or "The  Winters Tale"?   

b) Was Marlowe’s murther feigned in reality?  

The current mighty "media pabulum" of an adulation of William of Stratford  (Bardolatry) during his anniversary  (apr.23, 400th year of death) , mainly written by a journalistic juvenile "pseudo-expertise" with always newly copied  concoctions,  makes it necesssary also  to point to  opposing views  ....

____________________________

 Conversation between Mark Rylance und Sir Derek Jakobi:            

(410) The Shakespeare Authorship Question: An abysmal academic taboo ! (Video)

Virtually  all   Shakespeare authorship inconsistencies could  be resolved , ...

... if  You would be ready to accept the complex  "Marlowe" authorship  thesis of a "Covert Operation of the Crown"

a recent Video creation  intended to contribute to the 400th anniversary of  

the  death of William Shakspere, Stratford (23.April 2016) .
https://youtu.be/9fdgR2OubvM?t=1

William of Stratford  allowed the true poet (deadly threatened Christopher Marlowe/alias Shake-speare) to mask his identity and use his name as  his pseudonym for safety reasons. 

----Marlowe's death, a plot  ( a real conspiracy !) was feigned with support of the Crown (William Cecil). 

The defamed national Poet, Dramatist  and Superstar of London's Theater   

- according to the law threatened with death, charged of treason-

was forced to permanently give up his identity, to live undercover and write under many pennames/pseudonyms (incl. Shakespeare) throughout his life.- 

The totally covered situation reminds one to current practices of hidden false flag "Insider"operations  (such as WTC-7).

Virtually  all   Shakespeare authorship inconsistencies could  be resolved , but only when people are ready to accept the complex  "Marlowe" thesis of A "Covert Operation"

(by definition  strictly designed  that nobody will be able to disclose it....)

(409) Shakespeare's empty grave. Why the missing skull ?

Shakspere's skull missing (...in his Grave ...  )

Why the global media coverage did not touch  the century old Shakespeare authorship question (SAQ) a single time, possibly related to this result? 

__________________

One should realize that the more amazing thing would have been if the skull were found to be intact.

____________

Archaeologists recently scanned for the first time (using  GPR,  Ground-Penetrating Radar)  the grave of  William Shakespeare at England's Holy Trinity Church in Stratford-upon-Avon.- The findings were featured in a documentary "Secret History: Shakespeare's Tomb"  on Britain's Channel 4 TV and had a great media coverage.-  They made a head-scratching discovery: 

Shakspere's skull missing

(also no other bones were identifiable(?), but astonishingly not mentioned). 

Time has not yet come for orthodox Stratfordians, mainly literary academics, to rethink about the life of the author of Shakespeare's works with the possibility of an entirely different paradigm  deliberately dismissed. 

Given the facts abouts the empty grave why has the global media coverage not touched the century old Shakespeare authorship question (SAQ) a single time? (read Blog 345 The SAQ: The most perverse , irrational academic Taboo ever...)

(408) The "true" Shakespeare . (Polimanteia , Part 6 )

The author of "Polimanteia" : 

Atheisme hath perswaded the world of my death"

____________

Christopher Marlowe :

The jew of Malta

 (printed 1633)

„The Jew of Malta", was a successful play of Christopher Marlowe, which has been premiered in London 1592 with 36 performances during 1591/92.. It opens with a prologue spoken by Machevill (Machiavelli) indicating an allegoric autobiografic presentation of Marlowe's change of identity, his survival and his frequent concealed returns to Englands.- 

(»Machevil« has been proposed as the anagram »Ch. M. Alive«)  of the living Christopher Marlowe.

The play wasn't published until 1633, long after all those who would have been involved in court saving Marlowe from the Star Chamber, were dead. 

It is of note that Marlowe was referred to as "Machevill" by his friends.(T.Nashe, R.Greene, G.Harvey) It is not known at what time the prologue was added to the play, most likeley 1601 after a noticeable revival and textual revision of the play. For several reasons the play was printed for the first time only in 1633.

The first words of the prologue clearly clarify Marlowe’s situation: The world believes that he is dead,  (»albeit all the world think Machiavel is dead, but in reality  yet  was his soul but flown beyond the Alps; and , now the Guise is dead, is come from France and frolic with his friends.  … and let them know that I am Machiavel« .

The historical Machiavelli was dead at that time for nearly 100 years. Machevil , who plays no role whatsoever within the play. Marlowe expresses in the prologe, that
 «, »to frolic with his friends«  »to some perhaps my name is odiuos (»but such as love me, guard me from their tongues« »let them kow that I am Machiavell »admired I am of those who hate me most«,  »though some speak openly against my books«).

Marlowe is fully aware that some speak openly against his book«),.  (»Yet will they read me and thereby attain To Peter’s chair« they do not want to conflict with religion, he  count religion but a childish toy »and hold there is no sin but ignorance«). He reflects, wich rumors my have distributed his alleged murder  (»Birds of the air will tell of murders past (»I am ashamed to hear such fooleries«).  (»Let me be envied and not pitied!«).  (»But whither am I bound? I come not, I, To read a lecture here in Britanie, But to present the tragedy of a Jew«). 
                                                   ______________________

In »Polimanteia« the author describes the danger, caused by equating him with Macchiavelli.- He sees this as the main  reason for his fateful doom (»Machivell hath obtained so much credit amongst the greatest states men of all Europe, Atheisme hath perswaded the world of my death«). No comparison could have been been more harmful for him.(»Cann any counsel be more pernicious to a Common wealth?«... »which he never meaneth to imbrace in trueth« 
.
This statement can easily recognize Marlowe as the author of "Polimanteia".

Who else would have had in 1594 reason to accuse Machiavelli as the cause of his "supposed" demise?