The seemingly absurd assumption
of a Multiple Pseudonymity of the true Shakespeare (Marlowe)
can only be accepted gradually!
_________________________
That "Shake-speare" was just one of many pen names of the true poet genius, who wrote Hamlet or King Lear, is not possible to convey until today.
The claim of the revised Marlowe Thesis that even contemporary english literary giants such as George Chapman, Thomas Heywood or Michael Drayton have been pseudonyms or pennames of the true poet - up to now - is interpreted as the mad offspring of a diseased brain ...just as insane as the claim that 75 contemporaries of Shakespeare wrote the works of Shakespeare :
Stanley Wells: (Video: 17.00 No more available)
The very idea that so many people have been suggested as the author of Shakespeare's work in itself to me is enough to show that it is a mad idea, it's just crazy!
To think however that the true author of “The Tempest“ or the "->The Winters Tale (Book chapter 11 p-390-405)“ did not publish 18 plays during his own lifetime; nay, more, that so careless was he of his fame that he left it in doubt whether half the plays attributed to him were really written by him, requires a rationale plausible explanation!
If we ever were to succeed in accepting the Marlowe Authorship Thesis (Briefly: the true matchless gemius and "poet" was forced to feign his death, change identity and hold to his promise to never identify himself and to write under multiple pen names), this can only be achieved in incremental steps rather than all at once.-
A first step is to provide and to accept evidence that Marlowe was hiding behind individual author-pen names -
Blogs 391-398 regard the narrative poem "Willobie His Avisa" (1594) of an anonymous author "H.W." supposed to be Henry Willobie. The poem entered in the registers of Stationer's Hall on 3 September 1594.
In 1886 John Leigh, President of the Spenser Society, wrote in a preface to a Reprint of AVISA that Henry Williobie could well have been a pseudonym .(s.next Blogs)
Stanley Wells: (Video: 17.00 No more available)
The very idea that so many people have been suggested as the author of Shakespeare's work in itself to me is enough to show that it is a mad idea, it's just crazy!
To think however that the true author of “The Tempest“ or the "->The Winters Tale (Book chapter 11 p-390-405)“ did not publish 18 plays during his own lifetime; nay, more, that so careless was he of his fame that he left it in doubt whether half the plays attributed to him were really written by him, requires a rationale plausible explanation!
If we ever were to succeed in accepting the Marlowe Authorship Thesis (Briefly: the true matchless gemius and "poet" was forced to feign his death, change identity and hold to his promise to never identify himself and to write under multiple pen names), this can only be achieved in incremental steps rather than all at once.-
A first step is to provide and to accept evidence that Marlowe was hiding behind individual author-pen names -
Blogs 391-398 regard the narrative poem "Willobie His Avisa" (1594) of an anonymous author "H.W." supposed to be Henry Willobie. The poem entered in the registers of Stationer's Hall on 3 September 1594.
In 1886 John Leigh, President of the Spenser Society, wrote in a preface to a Reprint of AVISA that Henry Williobie could well have been a pseudonym .(s.next Blogs)
Significant arguments (s.subsequent Blogs) imply that the author of "WILLOBIE HIS AVISA" has been the "true" Shakespeare [alias Marlowe]
