(698) Why MARLOWE does not dominate the SHAKESPEARE authorship debate?

 Why MARLOWE

does not dominate the

SHAKESPEARE authorship debate?

................

The V I D E O  questions why Marlowe's theory ranks third in popularity, behind Edward de Vere (Earl of Oxford) and Francis Bacon, despite their weaker claims.

Oxford's candidacy is critiqued for chronological issues: he died in 1604, nine years before plays like The Tempest, Macbeth, and Cymbeline were published, requiring convoluted rationalizations.- This persistence stems from classist biases assuming only an aristocrat could produce such masterpieces.

Bacon's theory appeals to seekers of esoteric wisdom and hidden ciphers, but his impersonal, scientific style contrasts sharply with Shakespeare's emotional, dramatic genius. The dominance of these alternatives is blamed on cultural inertia, blind reverence for the Shakespeare myth, scholarly complacency, and the allure of aristocratic or conspiratorial narratives.

Marlowe's theory is dismissed not for lack of plausibility but because it demands questioning cherished myths and confronting centuries of misattribution.

The Video argues that Marlowe's documented genius, genre mastery, and mysterious "death" make him the only logical contender.

Accepting this would honor the true author and exemplify the pursuit of inconvenient truth in intellectual inquiry. The video urges laying the Stratford myth to rest and giving credit to Marlowe, ending with a call for historical revisionism.

------------------------------------

Overall, it's a advocacy for reevaluating Shakespearean authorship through rational evidence rather than entrenched biases.

-----------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

--------------