TOP 10
Arguments for MARLOWE
as the only plausible 'TRUE' Shakespeare
---------------
-1- Marlowe’s “death” of 1593 is highly suspicious
The Deptford (Coroners) inquest reads like a staged legal fiction, consistent with a feigned death arranged by powerful patrons.(W.Cecil)
-2- Immediate continuation of Marlowe’s literary voice AFTER 1593
Shakespeare's printed Works begins precisely where Marlowe’s known work ends—without any stylistic rupture.
-3- Striking Stylistic and Linguistic continuity
Vocabulary, imagery, rhetoric, blank-verse & other techniques, and dramatic construction link Marlowe directly to Shakespeare.
-4- Superior education and classical learning
Marlowe’s Cambridge training and humanist learning fit the plays perfectly; Stratford Shakespeare’s education does not.
-5- Insider knowledge of court, diplomacy, and Europe
The plays display detailed familiarity with aristocratic life, law, Italy, France, and intelligence work—areas Marlowe knew firsthand.
-6- Obsession with exile, disguise, and double identity
Central Shakespearean themes (autobiographically) mirror the psychology of a writer forced to live under assumed names.
-7- The sudden SILENCE of Marlowe, the sudden RISE of “Shakespeare”
No other Elizabethan case shows such a perfect transfer of genius from one “dead” author to a new yet unknown poet name.
- 8 - Absence of personal literary traces for Stratford Shakespeare
Not a single letter ever discovered !!!, No manuscripts, books, or contemporary testimony link him directly to authorship.
-9- Use of Multiple Pseudonyms in the period
Marlowe has written under a multiplicity of Pseudo-names, with “Shakespeare” as the most obvious one.
-10- Only Marlowe explains the Totality of the Evidence
The Marlovian hypothesis uniquely accounts for stylistic continuity, historical anomalies, psychological depth, and documentary silence.
No comments:
Post a Comment