2 Penn engineers start from false assumptions!
They use texts of contemporary authors (they are convinced to know) who collaborated with Shakespeare!
(Such as Middleton, Fletcher , Chapman, Peele)
_____________________
Two Penn engineers tell us
on a --> BLOG <---click
that they reached a landmark conclusion, by using "word adjecent networks" (A way of analyzing a piece of text to determine unique hidden characteristics of its writers)..
Believe it or not, Prof.Ribeiro confirms , that
"There is by now evidence that about a third of the plays Shakespeare contained pieces that were not written by him"... and that
"...we keep enlarging the number of people with whom Shakespeare collaborated and that will help us understand better his creating writing process..." and that
"...we know now that Marlowe played an important role on Shakespeare becoming Shakespeare"
There is a little problem. How do they know for sure that they start from correct assumptions claiming that
a) we have the ability to use texts that we know, who the writers of those texts are , and we can use that knowledge to classify texts, we don't know...
b) e.g. by ...comparing the Marlowe profiles to some of Shakespeare's late plays where we know that Marlowe was not the candidate of those plays...
Do they really know?
Fallacies (as an erroneous argument dependent upon an unsound or illogical contention) happen....
.
.. When an individual utilizes another individual’s lack of information on a specific subject as proof that his own particular argument is right.
... When somebody asserts that a thought or conviction is correct since it is the Thing the general population accepts.
.
.. When an individual utilizes another individual’s lack of information on a specific subject as proof that his own particular argument is right.
... When somebody asserts that a thought or conviction is correct since it is the Thing the general population accepts.