(616) A Stunning Turnaraound of Oxfordian Alexander Waugh?? Has he become a Marlowian?

ALEXANDE R   W A U G H  (10)

ZOOM Webinar  with Alexander Waugh which premiered on Dec.2020

I recorded and copied 2 Interesting stunning minutes starting at 01:55.40

Marlowe exists,  ... as a separate entity

TRANSCRIPT:   Life Event 12 Dec 2020 WEBINAR 

Read what Alexander Waugh expressed:  

 JUST AN IDEA (?) .

 A GUESS (?)

 _____-->1:55:40______

A.Waugh: " 1:55:40  I would just say: it's a sidely (?), weird and fantastical theory, but I don‘t wonder if Marlowe exists, as a separate entity,  a separate name, from the great Shakespeare… school,  and there are all these experts and are telling us  that his hand is all over some of the Shakespeare plays ..Henry VI particularly    …tell us that he exists [lived],  a separate entity, possibly because Edward de Vere could not stand  the sight of him  after he realized his atheism  and that therefore his contribution to the Shakespeare Canon  which may have included EDWARD II  and things like that, they were sort of let loose and they got a life of their own  and hence Marlowe has this great name for him self .-

 Just an Idea,…it’s a guess."

Click VIDEO (1: 55:40)

_____________________________________

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive: (MARLOWE/Shakespeare)

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(615) 2 different versions of the Shakespeare play "The Taming of a / the Shrew"

2 different versions of the Shakespeare play

           (1) "The Taming of A Shrew"

(2) "The Taming of THE Shrew"

[lying almost 30 years apart! ]

A, The Taming of 'A' Shrew: an Anonymous Q1 version (printed in 1594)

B, The Taming of 'THE' Shrew: The Shakespeare First Folio version (printed in 1623).

Even today, Shakespeare scholars deny this fact.”

Both plays must have been written by a singular author : Christopher Marlowe, the only "true" or "real" Shakespeare:

Click VIDEO

————————-

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive: (MARLOWE/Shakespeare)

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(614) Why Shakespeare and Francis Bacon never (ever) met or communicated with each other?

This  VIDEO collects arguments, 
why the only 'absolute' POET-GENIUS  of his age

Christopher MARLOWE 

used the following Names …(A,B,C) 

A    'SHAKESPEARE '/' QUARLES'  as one of his first and

        and last literary PSEUDO-NYMS

B   Tobie MATHEW as his almost  life-long  INCOGNITO                    NAME and 

———

C    Francis BACON as his lifelong most estimated 'personal

        friend's NAME,  

                                                          

                                                   Click  VIDEO (55 min.)

——————————-

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive: (MARLOWE/Shakespeare)

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(613) The North SHAKESPEARE Enigma

             THOMAS  (& GEORGE)  N O R T H, 

A famous double of plagiarist in the late 1570ies of Shakespeare's plays ??

_____________________________________

Proposed solution of the North / Shakespeare riddle

A thousand  text parallels between NORTH and SHAKESPEARE (like fingerprints) cannot have emerged from 2 different, 

but only from 1 singular subject (and brain!)

____________

This 'singular' brain belonged to the only existing  'true'  concealed 

       poet GENIUS and 

only dramatist GENIUS of its time:

Christopher Marlowe

__________________

Reflect (Click) this  VIDEO

——————————-

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(612) John FLETCHER Shakespere's Collaborator ?

J.F. (John Fletcher)  belongs to the Pseudo-Initials of MARLOWE,!  

     Only under this condition it becomes understandable and logical, that Marlowe did not collaborate, but - alone - was the true poet-genius writing under his frontman's name SHAKSPEARE  

                     The' King  HENRY VIII play'. 

It is more plausible that a single dramatist genius was the author of the King HENRY VIII play!

         

Within the play a hidden author revealing himself as Ambassador Capucius...  

                   MARLOWE was writing under PSEUDO-NAMEs (or PSEUDO-INITIALS  J.F. 

                                                                                  such as  

                 SHAKE-SPEARE  & FLETCHERs (John Fletcher.,  

                                                                                      Giles Fletcher .,  

                                                                                                Phineas Fletcher .) 

         or PSEUDO-INITIALS such as J. F. ( John Fletcher /  or John  Ford)?

                                                                      ______________________

----------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(611) Shakespeare: A Freemason ?? -- Did A.Waugh deliberately overlook MARLOWE ?

   

  

   

ALEXANDER  W A U G H (9)

From      Alexander Waugh's last Youtube VIDEO

I learned that 

 a) "....Hermeticisms survived as the philosophical and theological Epicenter of Freemasonry.- ..." in England

 b) "....that one of the Key messages of Hermes (Trismegistos) is that he writes: "The greatest evil in mankind is ignorance...seek then a guide to take you by the hand and lead you to the portals of knowledge that(?) te the light cleansed of all darkness..." 

 c) " who better to that than William Shakespeare who stands in Leicester Square carved in marble pointing to Marlowe’s words : "THERE IS NO DARKNESS BUT IGNORANCE"

                            

                           Shakespeare carved in Marble  at Leicester Square (London)

                          with Marlowe's famous phrase!

d) Waugh: " Shakespeare thus very close to the Hermetic philosophers and to Hermes..(Trismegistos)

e) Question : isn’t  more appropriate  to associate this Marble" phrase to Marlowe's famous sentence  in "The Jew of Malta"   :  

I count religion but a childish toy, 

and hold there is no sin [darkness]  but ignorance. 

or Marlowe’d ‚Doktor Faustus‘.  and the Ignorance in knowledge 

 One  must take this as another logical and plausible evidence that Marlowe 

                                  a) is identical with Shakespeare (his pseudonym)

                                          https://youtu.be/E5ABHcbLQiE

                                   b) that he is a predecessor of the Freemasons?

_______________________________________________________________________

                    click VIDEO  (Alexander Waugh)

------------------------------------ 

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(610) TOP 10 Pseudonyms of Marlowe (alias 'TRUE' Shake-speare:)

The Pen-name Shake-speare is dealt with a list of the 

Top 10 most significant Pseudonyms 

of a singular Poet and dramatist Genius 

Christopher Marlowe.

-------------

That Marlowe (aka Shake-speare) survived can only become conceivable when his incredibly great spirit was incredibly productive,

writing under many pseudonyms, over a long period of time!

click VIDEO! (35 min)

_________________

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(609) Rodney Bolt - True Shakespeare’s (=Marlowe‘s) After-Life !!

Rodney BOLTs History Play: 

The Lives and After-life 

of Christopher Marlowe

Rodney Bolt

Rodney Bolt, born in South Africa, Living in Amsterdam  is a theater director, 

travel writer and non-fiction author. His travel reports appear

 in newspapers and magazines such as The Daily Telegraph and Vogue

 and have won awards in Germany and the USA. 

------------------

In 2004 he published the “History Play,

📘The Lives and Afterlife of Christopher Marlowe

This book reimagines the life of Christopher Marlowe, taking the idea that he didn’t die in a tavern brawl in 1593 but instead staged his death, fled Europe, and went on to write the works now attributed to Shakespeare.--  Bolt blends historical research with imaginative narrative, following Marlowe through Elizabethan society, espionage, sailing troupes, academia and European courts — offering a rich, alternative “biography” that plays with historical fact and conjecture.  rodneybolt.com+1

” A fictional play based on the life story of Christopher Marlowe. .

A creative and imaginative book

A triumphant resurrection of the poet genius and dramatist Marlowe

-------------------------------------

Ai is absolutely correct, when helping me to summarize:

Why Bolt Stops Short

Bolt’s restraint is not intellectual weakness—it is institutional realism. If he would  state openly that Marlowe survived and wrote as Shakespeare would mean:

Academic excommunication -- Media caricature --Loss of mainstream readership

By stopping short, Bolt achieves something more subtle: He normalizes Marlowe as the source of Shakespearean drama. Once that is conceded, the Marlovian conclusion becomes a matter of logic, not speculation.

Rodney Bolt does not argue that Marlowe wrote Shakespeare—but after reading him, it becomes increasingly difficult to believe that anyone else could have.”

Rodney Bolt’s History Play is a perfect illustration of this phenomenon: a book that systematically dismantles the plausibility of orthodox Shakespearean authorship while loyally saluting its flag at the end.

Bolt does not intend to assist the Marlovian case. But it is   precisely why he does. 

Bolt’s narrative divides neatly in two:(1)Marlowe: documented, dangerous, brilliant, alive on every page.  (2)Shakespeare: successful, but historically hollow.

This is not biography.It is displacement.

Once more: To state openly that Marlowe survived and wrote under multiple names—including Shakespeare—would mean: Expulsion from academic respectability,-- Dismissal as a “conspiracy theorist,” -- the End of mainstream publishing opportunities.

Bolt piles the evidence high. He stops one inch from the conclusion. He bows to orthodoxy and exits.  --- But readers are not bound by his caution.

Rodney Bolt does not refute the Marlovian case. - He normalizes it without naming it. After reading Bolt, it becomes increasingly difficult to believe that:Marlowe simply vanished,  Shakespeare suddenly appeared fully armed, a single provincial actor absorbed the greatest mind of his age without trace.

Bolt makes Marlowe too large, too coherent, too alive to be buried in 1593. 

That is not a service to Stratfordianism. It is a slow, elegant dismantling of it.

---

  Evidence Is Not the Problem — Courage Is

The Shakespeare authorship question persists not because evidence is lacking, but because inference is policed. -- Rodney Bolt supplies the evidence. Marlovian multi-pseudonymity supplies the inference. Stratfordians may continue to pretend these are unrelated. But logic is not impressed by tradition.

 

 

-----------------------------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                             ->Popular

(608) The incredible Shakespeare Bodenham Deception

JOHN B O D E N H A M 

This VIDEO favor the Idea that

John BODENHAM (The name based on Jean BODIN) has been

                 an ALIAS / PSEUDONYM / PEN-NAME  

[ similar to SHAKE-SPEARE]

and to other 'alleged' coworkers! 

of the contemporary poet-genius Christopher Marlowe

study this V I D E O !

_____

VI D E O (on 5 Pseudonyms -incl.BODENHAM)

(44 min.)

-------------------------------------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(607)Marlowe alias Shake-speare alias Drayton . The acceptance and need of contextual biographical proof

Michael   D R A Y T O N 

The need of contextual biographical proof

of Marlowe's enduring survival

VIDEO on DRAYTON (like SHAKE-SPEARE) a Pseudonym of MARLOWE 

 V I D E O  (170 min!)

-------------------------------------

Quite frankly, even among convinced Marlovians 

  a set of fundamental reflections are missing

1. A Marlovian theory cannot exist—indeed, it makes no sense at all—unless one first accepts that Marlowe survived 1593.

2. If Marlowe (alias Shakespeare) did survive, then he necessarily has lived on for decades thereafter.

3. Such a prolonged survival (until 1655 !!) presupposes a concrete, coherent biography—years of lived experience that cannot simply be left blank.

4. These life data and experiences must inevitably be reflected, in manifold ways, in texts written under concealed or pseudonymous identities ***—and by no means only in the Shakespeare plays.

5. Can anyone seriously maintain that no contextual, autobiographical, or poetical evidence needs to be sought, analysed, or reconstructed?

 ***Michael Drayton ( s.extensive VIDEO , below ) stands exemplarily for the multiplicity of concealed "pseudonymous"  of  "TRUE"  SHAKESPEARE (ALIAS MARLOWE)

In truth, this contextual autobiographical evidence constitutes the very cornerstone of circumstantial proof and historical reasoning in any serious Marlovian argument.

------------------------

And yet Daryl Pinksen—himself a Marlovian, mirabile dictu—appears not to have   engaged with a single line of the extensive "SECOND  , or AFTER-LIFE "  , answering the decisive question: what and when did Marlowe do, what did he write, under how many   pseudonyms (other than Shakespeare)?

                            during his extensive “Second” or “After-life”,  post-1593-? (living till 1655)                                                                    ——————                                    

Marlovian Daryl Pinksen

This silence is not a minor oversight. It amounts to a deeply discouraging confession of methodological failure.

-----------------------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular                                   

 

(606) Pal Faklen's (Budapest, Hungary) enlarged article "Marlowe's delayed resurrection.

PAL  F A K L E N 

Detailed article (and Book) of  Hungarian publisher and editor Pal Faklen (Budapest) 

As a longtime Marlowian, I recently discovered a  more detailed article of the hungarian publisher , editor and graphpology expert Pal Faklen (Budapest) on the Marlowe Shakespeare  authorship issue (entitled "Marlowe's Delayed Resurrection ) which I would like to recommend.

I  hope that Pal Faklens essential and amazing arguments will receive (slowly, but at least) a gradual recognition world wide.

Click Article

https://www.academia.edu/45033834/Marlowes_delayed_resurrection

 _____________________________

Pal  Faklen

 Publication in Academia.edu

                      ________________                      Please  forward the article to interested parties…

------------------------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                                 ->Popular

(605) 3 "Apocrypha Shakespeare' Plays" : A gigantic abyss of Academic Failure!

 SHAKESPEARE's  APOCRYPHA (4)

A gigantic Abyss of Academic inability 

of Reasoning in Humanities

------------

                                                            

             

           

The AI-Dialog VIDEO (by NotebookLM)   deals with  the ORIGINAL VIDEO ( below) of 3 plays of Shakespeare’s Apocrypha  "A Y o r k s h i r e  Tragedy, "The L o n d o n   Prodigal" and  "P e r i c l e s" , that it calls a fundamental failure of academic reasoning in Shakespeare studies.   

Pericles, a play long treated as semi-apocryphal and only reluctantly admitted into the canon. The speaker argues that Pericles demonstrates 

how unstable and arbitrary the boundary between “canon” and “apocrypha” really is.

 For centuries, the play Pericles was dismissed as unworthy of Shakespeare because of its perceived stylistic unevenness, only to be rehabilitated later through ad hoc theories of collaboration. The same reasoning, (the video claims), is denied to other apocryphal plays such as A Yorkshire Tragedy or The London Prodigal.

Scholars excuse weaknesses in Pericles but use similar features to exclude other works. This double standard reveals a circular logic: Shakespeare is defined by assumed excellence, and anything judged inferior must therefore be NON -Shakespearean. 

The video concludes that

  Pericles alone already undermines the credibility of the traditional canon-building process and exposes the methodological inconsistency at the heart of Shakespeare scholarship.

TAlk  / DIALOG   11 min

on the Original- Video  (below!)

of Shakespeares Apocraypha 

——————-

ORIGINAL - VIDEO (27min)

----------------------------------------

Additional VIDEO (18 min)

_____________________________________

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                                                                          ->Popular

(604) The impressive hope of self-fulfilling prophecy of the OXFRAUDIANS

 

The O X F R A U D S

The Game is over !!! It's quiet !!  Really?

Lately, I became aware of the wonderful Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of the OXFRAUDS. Their strong belief or expectation about the Shakespeare Authorship is,  that

T H E  G A M E  I S  O V E R !

At no time the OXFRAUDS had any real interest in finding out what of  the centuries-old doubt is justified and what is not. The Marlowe Theory, despite Peter Farey, had no chance with them. They haven't even started, to reflect the Marlowe issue....

.....how to explain the unimaginable amount of inconsistencies?

collected in ca 180 VIDEOS    – Complete Video Archive:

-------->   https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550      <-------

                 Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                ->Popular

-------------------------

They have  not  realized that they have very

bad cards in the long run :

Their greatest strength (by far) : the personal insult,

Their greatest weakness: the lack of stringent arguments

(to resolve any inconsistency)

________________

THE OXFRAUDS FINAL STATEMENT:

-->https://spark.adobe.com/page/nZOZrUwqnmcwY/

"Today there is no doubt that William Shakspere

of Stratford-upon-Avon wrote the work appearing

under his name in the First Folio in 1623."

"BUT PEOPLE ONCE CLAIMED THERE WAS.....

Doubt has disappeared. Debate has faded to almost complete insignificance.

Selling the concept of alternative authors of Shakespeare's work has become 

impossible. Hardly anyone is still at it. On our main site, Oxfraud.com, there

are hundreds of articles containing detailed rebuttal of once hotly-disputed

doubter arguments, dealing with a full scrapyard of wild claims and outrageous

conjecture.  And the foot of each article there are sometimes extensive comment

 sections.  Over the last five years these have dwindled

from a flood to a strike.

-------

And today ,  it's quiet. Too quiet. " 

[ R E A L L Y ?]

(603) Shakespeare a mask, a dummy , a mockup

Can it be ....,   that 'Universal'-Genius and 

'Poet Dramatist'-Genius (today  known as SHAKE(-)SPEARE ) never lived and existed ? 

....., that it was no real person, but an artificial M A S K!

     (... a F R O N T )

The Engraver clearly-marked the Chin-Neck line

 to indicate  a M A S K 

--------------------

For years I have observed that most Shakespeare admirers show remarkably little curiosity about the actual human being behind the works. The authorship question is dismissed as an irritation—declared “solved” precisely in order to avoid thinking about it—while any extended discussion is met with boredom or hostility.

To disrupt this comfortable indifference, I have therefore produced a brief provocation, designed to wake up and amuse even the most complacent Stratfordians.

The uncomfortable fact remains: more than 80 percent of Stratfordians have no real knowledge of Christopher Marlowe.

 ...the Front-Name - SHAKESPEARE trickily- borrowed from a living man William Shaksper  from Stratford. [familiar with the Printer Richard Field from Stratford]

......,  behind the Front  the only existing 'true' Poet Genius of his age 

Christopher  MARLOWE** was hiding :

click Short  VIDEO (2min.)

     

 

_________________________________

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                                 ->Popular