The (yet incomplete) Marlowe/Shakespeare Theory
of Ros Barber
When listening to Ros Barbers most recent (highly valuable) recapitulation on significant (since decades well known) Marlowe Connections , especially to Robert Devereux, the Earl of Essex...
...one asks oneself why she (if she believes that Marlowe did not die and that Shakspere from Stratford is not identical with the author of Hamlet) inexplicably seems never to have been interested in the continuation of Marlowes further life, his destiny and writings and wether she can agree at all with the logically compelling thesis of
when listening to Ros Barber’s most recent—and highly valuable—recapitulation of significant Marlowe connections, long well known for decades, especially those involving Robert Devereux, the Earl of Essex, one cannot help but ask why she—despite believing that Marlowe did not die in 1593 and that the man from Stratford was not the author of Hamlet—appears never to have taken a serious interest in the continuation of Marlowe’s life: his subsequent fate, his later writings, and, above all, whether she can at all agree with the logically compelling thesis of the
