(692) John EARLE, the actual smoking gun of the authorship of "TRUE" SHAKESPEARE

 John E A R L E ,

the actual smoking gun

of the authorship of "TRUE" SHAKESPEARE

.....

True Shakespeare, not John Earle, authored Micro-cosmography. The video’s central claim rests on the anonymity surrounding Micro-cosmography’s authorship, its publisher’s (Edw.Blount) connection to Shakespeare, and stylistic similar contents between the work and Shakespeare’s known writings.

Furthermore, the video explores the possibility of multiple Pseudonyms used by "true" Shakespeare, citing various epigrams as evidence.

the autobiographical elements within Micro-cosmography clearly point towards Shakespeare's authorship, contrasting it with the limited life experience of John Earle.

 ---------------------------------

ai Video Dialog on the Orignal VIDEO (below!)

--------------------------

ORIGINAL- VIDEO (35 min.)

Deep undiscovered contextual insights into the real personality of The TRUE poet genius SHAKESPEARE. (alias MARLOWE)

For God's sake don't confuse him with the dummy, 

William from Stratford!

----------------------------------- Micro-cosmographie Orig.Text ---> (Edit.1633) https://archive.org/details/microcosmograph02earlgoog/page/n10/mode/2up

--------------------------------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(691) Conversation (Dialog) on a Youtube-Video about William Basse a Penname of 'TRUE SHAKESPEARE (Marlowe)

ai Dialog on a Youtube-Video 

about William B A S S E

a Penname of 'TRUE' SHAKESPEARE 

(=Marlowe)

---------------

ai Dialog ( by NotebookLM Google)

on a original youtube video (below)

-------------------------------------

Original Youtube  (30 min.)

--------------------------------------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(690) Conversation on the absurdity of the shakespeare authorship

  Conversation (Dialog) on the Absurdity 

  of the Shakespeare Authorship

.......

Dialog on the Original VIDEO(below)

-----------------------------------------

Original Video

-------------------------------------------------------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(689) The 'true' Shakespeare and Markham, one of his multple pseudonyms,

 The 'true' Shakespeare

(not the Stratford man),

and Gervase Markham,

one of his multple Pseudonyms.

----------------

The Video argues that Gervase (or Jarvis) Markham wasn’t simply an ordinary Elizabethan writer, but rather a pseudonym—similar in function to “Shake-Speare”—used by Christopher Marlowe, whom the video identifies as the real author behind works traditionally attributed to Shakespeare and other contemporaries. 

1. Marlowe as the True Author:

   • The video supports the idea that Christopher Marlowe was the genuine creative force behind the Shakespeare canon and other works of the period.

   • It ties into the broader Marlowe/Multi-Pseudonymity authorship theory, which claims Marlowe didn’t die in 1593 but continued to write under various names. 

2. Markham as a Pseudonym:

   • Gervase Markham (sometimes called “Jarvis Markham” in the video) is presented not as a separate historical author, but as another alias through which Marlowe published.

   • The argument draws an “accordance” or correspondence between Marlowe and the Markham name, positioning Markham as part of a network of pseudonyms deployed for anonymity and concealment. 

3. Context Within Authorship Debate:

   • This claim is framed as one piece of evidence among several in favor of Marlowe’s authorship of works traditionally credited to William Shakespeare and others.

   • The video suggests that, like “Shake-Speare,” the name “Gervase Markham” served as a mask or cover identity rather than a real, independent historical author. 

   • 
     

Overall Message:

The Video extends the Marlovian thesis by proposing that multiple Elizabethan writer-names  --including the relatively obscure Markham -- were intentional pseudonyms adopted by one underlying author (Marlowe), challenging the conventional attribution of authorship for Shakespeare and other literary figures.

--------------------------------

---------------------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular

(688) Shakespeare's authorship - the outrageous failure ; Stratfordianism for ever?

  Shakespeare's authorship -

 an outrageous failure 

 Stratfordianism for ever?

----------------------

The VIDEO discusses the Marlovian theory of Shakespeare authorship, claiming Christopher Marlowe did not die in 1593 but feigned his death.

It references Dennis R a w l i n s' essay in DIO journal (Vol. 18), arguing Marlowe created the pseudonym "Shakespeare" for survival. Marlowe faced treason and heresy charges, risking torture and execution. Just 12-14 days after Marlowe's alleged death, Shakespeare's first work, Venus and Adonis, appeared fully mature, which is statistically improbable.

The theory suggests Marlowe used William Shaksper (a real Stratford businessman) as a frontman to hide his continued writing. This explains the lack of Shakespeare manuscripts or personal letters. It also accounts for why Shakespeare's death in 1616 was ignored by literati— the real genius (Marlowe) was still alive under the pseudonym.

The video questions the official coroner's report of Marlowe's stabbing, noting inconsistencies like the improbable fatal wound location. A substitute body (John Penry's) was used in the faked death.

R a w l i n s  ties together anomalies that the Marlovian theory resolves.

The Video argues media suppresses discussion of  "stunning realities." Oxfordian and Stratfordian theories are dismissed as inadequate.

The Video-title implies if Marlowe survived, rival theories collapse. overall, it passionately advocates Marlowe as the true author of Shakespeare's works.

 

-----------------------------------------

VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:

https://www.youtube.com/@bastianconrad2550

Open Heading-->  Home -->Videos -- Shorts  -- Posts

                                                       ->Popular