A Defence of MARLOWEs MULTI-PSEUDONYMITY THEORY
With 5 Examples (Heywood, Middleton, Taylor , Wither, Clarke/Covell
——————————
5 chosen pseudonyms (of many more) of the “TRUE” Shakespeare—Wither, Heywood, Taylor, Middleton, and Clerke—do not merely support the argument: they expose it. Together, they form a coherent and unavoidable framework that validates Christopher Marlowe’s Multi-Pseudonymity Thesis (MPT).
At the same time, they lay bare the otherwise unspeakable truth: that the Shakespeare authorship problem, after more than four centuries, remains fundamentally insoluble—unless Marlowe’s concealed survival and systematic use of multiple literary identities is finally acknowledged.
--------------------------------
VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive:
Open Heading--> Home -->Videos -- Shorts -- Posts
->Popular
