SHAKESPEARE's play
"Love's Labour's Lost " (LLL)
contains stunning autobiographical connections to MARLOWE .
------
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gocwBtFEA-M&t=1s
Global Comments, Discussions , News, Views, Debates, Videos, Controversies etc. on the Shakespeare Authorship .
SHAKESPEARE's play
"Love's Labour's Lost " (LLL)
contains stunning autobiographical connections to MARLOWE .
------
The Marlowe-Shakespeare Authorship controversy is based on a 'true' conspiracy,
( not a conspiracy theory!)
Marlowe was not killed.
Therefore 'O x f o r d i a n i s m'
is dead, and so is
'S t r a t f o r d i a n i s m'.
Click VIDEO
(ARGUMENTS OF... Dennis Rawlins... )
_______________
Edward de Vere
17th Earl of Oxford
__________________
Is Edward de Vere (who died in 1604!) really the more plausible or logical Shakespeare authorship Candidate ?
compared to Christopher Marlowe!
__________________________
___________ click VIDEO ________
They are by no means identical personalities.
The living William Shakspere from Stratford (to be seen as a bust in the Trinity church of Stratford ) was taken as the 'corrupted Peudonym' SHAKESPEARE ( copper engraving) in the collected dramatic works (so-called FF, First Folio 1623) as a cover for the only existing greatest English Poet-Genius (Christopher Marlowe) whose death had to be feigned for life-saving reasons.
___________
Short Recap
of the Marlowe Shakespeare authorship thesis
There was only one truly great poetic GENIUS in his time: Christopher MARLOWE (born in the same year 1564 as Shakspere/Stratford ) who in his 30th year of life (May 1593) was threatened by execution following slanderous accusation (of TREASON & Heresy) against him by the English Crown & Church. A feigned death staged in Deptford with the help of Marlowe's employer, the 'Senior Advisor' of Queen Elisabeth William Cecil (Lord Burghley) saved him by banishing him - for his own safety - but ...
...at the price of a permanent abandoning of identity & name, writing henceforth [ as already previously!] behind a CURTAIN of ALIAS & PSEUDONYMS such as
...
Richard B A R N F I E L D,
William B A S S E,
Francis B E A U M O N T
Nicholas B R E T O N,
George C H A P M A N,
(Double) John DAVIES,
Michael D R A Y T O N,
(Triple) J + Ph + G F L E T C H E R,
Thomas H E Y W O O D,
Henry P E A C H A M,
William S H A K E - S P E A R E,
George W I T H E R,
a. o.
as ABSURD
UNTHINKABLE and
LUDICROUS it may sound!
You may study singular detailed arguments for these names on this channel.(URL adress below the Video
_____________________________
TWELFTH NIGHT
As long as the 'borrowed Stratfordman's Name' SHAKSPEARE (from Stratford) is not recognized as the embellished ' FRONT-name S H A K E - S P E AR E of poet GENIUS M A R L O W E,
the author-ship puzzle will not be resolvable!
The Degree of Concordances between William GAGER & Christopher MARLOWE [ here seen as the only 'true' Shakespeare] seems too massive, to be purely coincidental:
Arguments in this VIDEO
The 'O X F R A U D', a literary group,
battaillon or brigade
fighting
a) f o r the 'Stratford-'Thesis and
b) a g a i n s t the 'Oxford-Theory,
fighting a desperate (on the long run) "double loosing" battle (a and b)
------------------
a) Stratford-'Thesis = William Shaksper (Stratford) wrote HAMLET, KING LEAR , etc.
b) Oxford-Theory, = the 17th Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere wrote HAMLET, KING LEAR , TIMON of Athens etc.
A definite (yet unrecognized) autobiographical play of the 'true' SHAKESPEARE
TIMON of ATHENS
He dialectically divided himself into 3 different selfs
that embody:
IDEALISM (TIMON)
REALISM (ALCIBIADES)
SARKASM (APE MANTUS)
_________________________________________
Recently I watched a ZOOM Webinar with Alexander Waugh which premiered on Dec.20020
I recorded and copied 2 Interesting stunning minutes starting at 01:55.40
TRANSCRIPT: Life Event 12 Dec 2020 WEBINAR
Read what Alexander Waugh expressed:
A.Waugh: " I would just say: it's a sidely (?), weird and fantastical theory, but I don‘t wonder if Marlowe exists, as a separate entity, a separate name, from the great Shakespeare… school, and there are all these experts and are telling us that his hand is all over some of the Shakespeare plays ..Henry VI particularly …tell us that he exists [lived], a separate entity, possibly because Edward de Vere could not stand the sight of him after he realized his atheism and that therefore his contribution the Shakespeare Canon which may have included EDWARD II and things like that, they were sort of let loose and they got a life of their own and hence Marlowe has this great name for him self .-
Just an Idea,…it’s a guess."
Click VIDEO (1: 55:40)
2 different versions of the Shakespeare play
"The Taming of A / THE Shrew"
[lying almost 30 years apart! ]
A 'SHAKESPEARE '/' QUARLES' as one of his first and last literary PSEUDO-NAMEs,
B Tobie MATHEW as an almost life-long INCOGNITO NAME and
C Francis BACON as his lifelong most estimated 'personal friend's NAME,
Click VIDEO
THOMAS & GEORGE N O R T H,
A famous double of plagiarist in the late 1570ies of Shakespeare's plays ??
_____________________________________
Proposed solution of the North / Shakespeare riddle
A thousand text parallels between NORTH and SHAKESPEARE (like fingerprints) cannot have emerged from 2 different,
but only from 1 singular subject (and brain!)
____________
This 'singular' brain belonged to the only existing 'true' concealed
poet GENIUS and
only dramatist GENIUS of its time:
Christopher Marlowe
__________________
Click VIDEO
J.F. (John Fletcher) belongs to the Pseudo-Initials of MARLOWE,!
Only under this condition it becomes understandable and logical, that he did not collaborate, but - alone - was the true poet-genius writing under his frontman's name SHAKSPEARE
It is more plausible that a single dramatist genius was the author of the King HENRY VIII play!
Within the play a hidden author revealing himself as Ambassador Capucius...
MARLOWE was writing under PSEUDO-NAMEs (or PSEUDO-INITIALS J.F.
such as
______________________
The argument presented in this VIDEO
favor the Idea that
John BODENHAM must have been a PSEUDONYM,
an ALIAS or PEN-NAME similar to SHAKE-SPEARE
The need of contextual biographical proof
of Marlowe's enduring survival
Literally, with all convinced Marlowians I miss some fundamental reflections:
1 A Marlowian Theory cannot exist, i.e. doesn’t make any sense, as long as one does not assume that Marlowe survived.
2 If Marlowe (alias Shakespeare) survived, however, ....
3 .... he must have had a specific biography for his surviving time. (up to 1655?)
4....these life data & experiences must have been reflected in some (many?) ways in texts of himself as of concealed pseudonymous poets, and by no means only in play texts of Shakespeare.
5Can anybody even remotely accept that there is no need for any contextual autobiographical (poetical) evidence and (re)search?
These "contextual" massive autobiographical evidence in fact are the cornerstones of the evidence, of circumstantial evidence and reasoning.
And Marlowian Daryl Pinksen (mirabile dictu!) doesn’t either have heard or ever listened to any line of all Youtube presentations or ever asked the crucial question what Marlowe might have done & written in his long surviving time?
What a depressing confession of failure!
Detailed article of Hungarian publisher and editor Pal Faklen (Budapest)
As a longtime Marlowian, I recently discovered a more detailed article of the hungarian publisher and editor Pal Faklen (Budapest) on the Marlowe Shakespeare authorship issue (entitled "The Delayed Resurrection of Marlowe) which I naturally liked very much.
I hope that Pal Faklens essential and amazing arguments will receive (slowly, but at least) a gradual recognition world wide.
Click Article
https://www.academia.edu/45033834/Marlowes_delayed_resurrection
Publication in Academia.edu
Please forward the article to interested parties…
SHAKESPEARE's APOCRYPHA
A gigantic Abyss of Academic inability
of Reasoning in Humanities
_____________________________________
Lately, I became aware of the wonderful Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of the OXFRAUDS. Their belief or expectation about the Shakespeare Authorship is, that the game is over.
At no time the OXFRAUDS had any real interest in finding out what about the centuries-old doubt is justified and what is not. The Marlowe Theory, despite Peter Farey, had no chance with them. They haven't even started, to reflect the Marlowe issue....
.....how to explain the unimaginable amount of inconsistencies?
collected in ca 100 VIDEOS
--------> (118) bastian conrad - YouTube <-------
Their greatest strength (by far) : the personal insult,
their greatest weakness: the lack of stringent arguments
(to resolve any inconsistency)
A brief highlight for the bored Stratfordians
Since I have long noticed that Shakespeare Admirers are not particularly interested in the real person of the poet and they consider the authorship problem as troublesome and as solved at the same time and do not estimate long discourses on the problem at all,
I fabricated for a change a short highlight to alert and entertain most of the bored Stratfordians.
More than 80% of Stratfordians have no precise knowledge of Marlowe.
CONSIDER !
The name SHAKE-SPEARE was a Penname for the 'true', prolific 'absolute' polymath and poet-genius called Christopher Marlowe, whose death was feigned with the help of the crown, he survived, but a 'long-life long' lived incognito and was forced to write under a barely imaginable number of pseudonyms and initials (of invented and/or really existing) persons (such as William S. from Stratford, a merchant, and shareholder)
One of these multiple Pennames:
Gervase Markham
is dealt with in this video.
__________
Believe it or not!
_________________
____________
________
______
____
__
Short Summary of a long Story!