For centuries, the question of Shakespeare's authorship has puzzled readers, scholars, and researchers.
This blog presents a comprehensive solution:
The Multi-Pseudonymity Theory (MPT).
According to my research, Christopher Marlowe — officially declared dead in 1593 — survived and continued to write under multiple pseudonyms.
This video presents the theory that the historical “Water Poet” John Taylor was merely a fictional identity of the dramatist Christopher Marlowe. (Alias TRUE Shakespeare).
The author of the VIDEO argues that Marlowe staged his own death and thereafter continued his work under various pseudonyms, including that of Shakespeare and (here) John Taylor.
Numerous inconsistencies in Taylor’s biography—such as his sudden emergence as a highly gifted poet without any prior literary background—are cited as evidence for this thesis. Through detailed textual analyses of works such as Taylor’s Motto, the video seeks to demonstrate that the autobiographical references and complex metaphors are more consistent with an exiled Marlowe.
Ultimately, Taylor is portrayed as part of a network of cover names used by Marlowe to secure his continued existence in secrecy. The investigation thus radically challenges the conventional literary attributions of the seventeenth century.
1. The anonymous Poem "A Funeral Elegy" (1612) is recognized in this VIDEO as an allegorical Parable of the "TRUE" Shakespeare (Christopher Marlowe.)
2. The specific solution of the SHAKESPEARE Authorship Problem: deadly threatened MARLOWE survived by faking his death with Royal Support (W. Cecil) and wrote (concealed and banished for life) under multiple Pseudonyms such as SHAKESPEARE, FORD and many more.
3. An additional contribution to the solution of the complex authorship Issue: It solves at the same time the bizarre and insane entire SHAKESPEARE CO-Authorship PHANTASM
Award winning journalist, author and
lecturer Martin Sieff
introduces - in this team lecture- a series of questions, paradoxes and facts that indicate a secret
world of political intelligence that not only involved Shakespeare
but that
point towards the possibility that
Shakespeare's young contemporary
Christopher Marlowe and the famous bard are
ONE AND THE SAME PERSON!!
click VIDEO
_________________________
Martin SIEFF's Video Conference
—————————————————
VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive: (MARLOWE/Shakespeare)
The VIDEO (below) argues that Francis Davison,
known historically as the editor/compiler of
A
Poetical Rhapsody (1602),
was actually a pseudonym used by the real Shakespeare, whom the creator
of the video identifies with Christopher Marlowe rather than the conventional
William Shakespeare of Stratford.
The video claims that the body of poetry and
textual details connected with Davison’s POETICAL RHAPSODY work point to a man being not a distinct historical poet but
instead a
Cover-name or Literary Alias.
The video fits into the broader
Marlovian authorship theory asserting that many early modern works attributed
to various authors were truly written by Marlowe under alternate names.
--------------------------------
For essential Details study This V I D E O
DAVISON ---- SONNET V "To PITTY" -----
SONNET V - To Pitty
Excerpt (fig.) out of this video
Tell her , I live, and living, cry for grace
——————————————-
VIDEOS – Complete Video Archive: (MARLOWE/Shakespeare)
This video argues for a non-traditional interpretation of Ralph Crane’s role in the creation of Shakespeare’s First Folio.
Ralph Crane, normally known by scholars as a professional scribe whose copies of King’s Men plays helped shape several texts in the First Folio, is here presented as much more than a copyist.
The Video suggests that Crane was actually a pen-name or identity used by the “true Shakespeare” — i.e., Christopher Marlowe, who, in this theory, faked his death in 1593 and continued writing under multiple pseudonyms.
The video claims that Crane’s own writings (particularly the prefaces to his poems The Works of Mercy and its 1625 edition The Pilgrim’s New Year’s Gift) contain allegorical hints or coded messages implying a hidden life and change of identity, including an assertion that the person on the Stratford monument “is not dead.
The argument further emphasizes Crane’s professional connections to legal figures, the Privy Council, and the theatre world as evidence that he operated in secrecy as a literary figure far beyond a typical scribe.
In short, the video reinterprets Ralph Crane not as a mere editor/scribe but as an alter ego or pseudonym of Christopher Marlowe, thus fitting into a broader Marlowe multi-pseudonymity theory of Shakespeare authorship.
