(597) The true Shakespeare as the Author of "Titus Andronicus".

The 'True' Shake-speare  (and not the false! Shakspere) as  the Author of 

"Titus Andronicus".

C O N C L U S I O N S :

There are numerous plausible and logical reasons to agree that Shakespeare ("William from Stratford) was not the author of Titus Andronicus:

1.)   A no longer comprehensible number of  renowned literary Experts (although largely 

forgotten and negated today) early doubted Shakespeare's authorship of  "Titus Andronicus" such 

as:

Lewis Theobald, Samuel Johnson, George Steevens, Edmond Malone, William Guthrie, John Upton, 

Benjamin Heath, Richard Farmer, John Pinkerton,  John Monck Mason, William Hazlitt and 

Samuel Taylor Coleridge a.o. 

2.) Quarto1 (printed 1594) entered the Stationer's register late 1593 only month after Marlowe's fatal twist of  fate

3.) Specific text analogies between Shakespeare’s "Titus Andronicus", "History plays" and  the "Sonnets" suggest a common poet and author: 

Demetrius, Tamara's son, speaks in “Titus” about 

Lavinia (II/1)

        "She is a woman, therefore to be woo’d" 

        "She is a woman, therefore to be won"; 

        "She is Lavinia, therefore to be lov'd",

This sounds strikingly similar in Shakespeare's 

Sonnet 41: 

        "Gentle thou art, and therefore to be won", 

        "Beauteous thou art, therefore to be assailed" 

«The same applies to» Henry VI/ I « (V / 3): 

        "She's beautiful,  and therefore to be woo'd" 

         "She is a woman,  therefore to be won"

4.)  The late insertion and content of scene III/2 in Titus Andronicus of the First Folio reveal unnoticed allegoric (autobiographic) parallels to the true authors senseless death..

(Titus):

 "a deed of death done on the innocent";

 as well as allegoric legacies, to posterity, to his 

daughter (Lavinia):

"...go with me Lavinia, I'll to thy closet; and go 

read with you sad stories chanced in the times of old"

and to his nephew (boy)

" Go with me:  thy sight is young and thou shalt 

read, when mine begins to dazzle

                                                                         [--->  ! End of the newly inserted scene! ]

5. In Marlowe's play "The Jew of Malta"  the villain "Barabas" definitely  influenced the Villain 

("Aaron" )  in "Titus Andronicus".

6. There are logical and plausible arguments that not only the authors of the history plays  "Edward 

II" [Marlowe[ and anonymous "Edward I" [Peele ??]) were identical, but also the authors of the anony-mous plays "Edward III" [Shakespeare?] and "Edward IV" [Heywood?] belonged to pennames of 

Marlowe.                          

                       ...for more details click these videos!

#

(596)When will SOF begin with necessary steps?

Where does "Oxfordianism" actually get the hope from, 

of ever gaining general acceptance of its theory? 

(a C e n t u r y    after   L o o n e y!)?

 I suppose

A dead end story!?

    An infinite way to an unavailing success!?

_________

SOF should define the Criteria

for final success!

Is the probability of success for Edward de Vere really 

so much better than for the only poetic, dramatic and universal- Genius of its time,

the singular former Superstar of the London Theater, Christopher Marlowe?

There are a thousand of PRO- Arguments FOR Marlowe

but only a singular essential CONTRA-Argument  

( His alleged  death ! due to his early assassination)

Shouldn't a Global Collective and Academe begin to reverse and correct a singular false fatal CONTRA-Argument  in favour of  thousands of logical and plausible PRO-Arguments for Christopher Marlowe's Survival as the "true" Shakespeare?

f

An open , honest and fair S O F community would at least have to invalidate all logical and plausible arguments in favour of Marlowe, which, given the facts, can hardly succeed...

When will SOF begin with the necessary steps?

100 VIDEO-Contribution

Collected Video-Contributions (Arguments) to support

the Marlowe/Shakespeare authorship thesis (oct. 2020)

Youtube Chanels